Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Polarizability microscopic

As implied by the trace expression for the macroscopic optical polarization, the macroscopic electrical susceptibility tensor at any order can be written in temis of an ensemble average over the microscopic nonlmear polarizability tensors of the individual constituents. [Pg.1189]

B) THE MICROSCOPIC HYPERPOLARIZABILITY IN TERMS OF THE LINEAR POLARIZABILITY THE KRAMERS-HEISENBERG EQUATION AND PLACZEK LINEAR POLARIZABILITY THEORY OF THE RAMAN EFFECT... [Pg.1190]

In Eq. (6) Ecav represents the energy necessary to create a cavity in the solvent continuum. Eel and Eydw depict the electrostatic and van-der-Waals interactions between solute and the solvent after the solute is brought into the cavity, respectively. The van-der-Waals interactions divide themselves into dispersion and repulsion interactions (Ed sp, Erep). Specific interactions between solute and solvent such as H-bridges and association can only be considered by additional assumptions because the solvent is characterized as a structureless and polarizable medium by macroscopic constants such as dielectric constant, surface tension and volume extension coefficient. The use of macroscopic physical constants in microscopic processes in progress is an approximation. Additional approximations are inherent to the continuum models since the choice of shape and size of the cavity is arbitrary. Entropic effects are considered neither in the continuum models nor in the supermolecule approximation. Despite these numerous approximations, continuum models were developed which produce suitabel estimations of solvation energies and effects (see Refs. 10-30 in 68)). [Pg.188]

In contrast with Eq. (5), Eq. (11) gives the frequency behavior in relation to the microscopic properties of the studied medium (polarizability, dipole moment, temperature, frequency of the field, etc). Thus for a given change of relaxation time with temperature we can determine the change with frequency and temperature of the dielectric properties - the real and imaginary parts of the dielectric permittivity. [Pg.12]

In qualitative terms, microscopic interactions are caused by differences in crystal chemical properties of trace element and carrier, such as ionic radius, formal charge, or polarizability. This type of reasoning led Onuma et al. (1968) to construct semilogarithmic plots of conventional mass distribution coefficients K of various trace elements in mineral/melt pairs against the ionic radius of the trace element in the appropriate coordination state with the ligands. An example of such diagrams is shown in figure 10.6. [Pg.672]

Abstract This chapter describes the experimentai compiement of theoretical models of the microscopic mechanism of ferroelectric transitions. We use the hydrogen-bonded compounds as examples, and attempt to show that the new experimental data obtained via recently developed high resolution nuclear magnetic resonance techniques for solids clearly support the hypothesis that the transition mechanism must involve lattice polarizability (i.e. a displacive component), in addition to the order/disorder behaviour of the lattices. [Pg.24]

Response to Electric and Acoustic Fields. If the stabilization of a suspension is primarily due to electrostatic repulsion, measurement of the zeta potential, can detect whether there is adequate electrostatic repulsion to overcome polarizability attraction. A common guideline is that the dispersion should be stable if f > 30 mV. In electrophoresis the applied electric field is held constant and particle velocity is monitored using a microscope and video camera. In the electrosonic amplitude technique the electric field is pulsed, and the sudden motion of the charged particles relative to their counterion atmospheres generates an acoustic pulse which can be related to the charge on the particles and the concentration of ions in solution (18). [Pg.549]

In the above equation a is the linear polarizability. The terms 3 and Y, called first and second hyperpolarizabilities, describe the2 nonlinear optical interactions and are microscopic analogues of x and x... [Pg.58]

The search of third-order materials should not just be limited to conjugated structures. But only with an improved microscopic understanding of optical nonlinearities, can the scope, in any useful way, be broadened to include other classes of molecular materials. Incorporation of polarizable heavy atoms may be a viable route to increase Y. A suitable example is iodoform (CHI ) which has no ir-electron but has a value (3J ) comparable to" that of bithiophene... [Pg.69]

In the microscopic calculation pairwise additivity was assumed. We ignored the influence of neighboring molecules on the interaction between any pair of molecules. In reality the van der Waals force between two molecules is changed by the presence of a third molecule. For example, the polarizability can change. This problem of additivity is completely avoided in the macroscopic theory developed by Lifshitz [118,119]. Lifshitz neglects the discrete atomic structure and the solids are treated as continuous materials with bulk properties such as the... [Pg.87]

In order to find a correlation between the macroscopic polarization and the microscopic properties of the material a single (polarizable) particle is considered. A dipole moment is induced by the electric field at the position of the particle which is called the local electric field Eloc... [Pg.14]

The dielectric constant is a macroscopic property of the material and arises from collective effects where each part of the ensemble contributes. In terms of a set of molecules it is necessary to consider the microscopic properties such as the polarizability and the dipole moment. A single molecule can be modeled as a distribution of charges in space or as the spatial distribution of a polarization field. This polarization field can be expanded in its moments, which results in the multipole expansion with dipolar, quadrupolar, octopolar and so on terms. In most cases the expansion can be truncated to the first term, which is known as the dipole approximation. Since the dipole moment is an observable, it can be described mathematically as an operator. The dipole moment operator can describe transitions between states (as the transition dipole moment operator and, as such, is important in spectroscopy) or within a state where it represents the associated dipole moment. This operator describes the interaction between a molecule and its environment and, as a result, our understanding of energy transfer. [Pg.475]

The dielectric constant of the vaccum c(j is included in the susceptibility definitions as SI units are used throughout this work. The analogous definition can be applied to the microscopic polarization p of a molecule with the molecular dipole moment jli and the polarizabilities a,/3, and y instead of the static polarization P (0) and the susceptibilities y-P. [Pg.127]

In this section, a simple description of the dielectric polarization process is provided, and later to describe dielectric relaxation processes, the polarization mechanisms of materials produced by macroscopic static electric fields are analyzed. The relation between the macroscopic electric response and microscopic properties such as electronic, ionic, orientational, and hopping charge polarizabilities is very complex and is out of the scope of this book. This problem was successfully treated by Lorentz. He established that a remarkable improvement of the obtained results can be obtained at all frequencies by proposing the existence of a local field, which diverges from the macroscopic electric field by a correction factor, the Lorentz local-field factor [27],... [Pg.39]

Rather than take a limit of large separations between relatively small spheres a of incremental polarizability a (it ), we can think of interactions within dilute suspensions or solutions. At relatively large separations, the shape and the microscopic details of an effectively small speck become unimportant. The only feature that is of interest is that the dilute specks ever so slightly change the dielectric and ionic response of the suspension compared with that of the pure medium. When the suspension of spheres is vanishingly dilute, esusp is simply proportional to their number density N multiplied by a(/ ) / susp — m (/ ) + Naa(i ) [see Fig. L1.42(a)]. [Pg.80]


See other pages where Polarizability microscopic is mentioned: [Pg.477]    [Pg.477]    [Pg.1190]    [Pg.337]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.358]    [Pg.508]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.442]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.307]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.446]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.469 , Pg.470 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info