Polarisability dipole

Figure 11.4 The effects of an electric field tronic polarisation, (b) ionic polarisation and (c) orienta tional polarisation dipoles are shown as arrows...

Figure 6.14 Antiferroelectric behaviour schematic (a) parallel array of spontaneous polarisation dipoles characteristic of a ferroelectric crystal (b) antiparallel array of dipoles in an antiferroelectric crystal...

Our discussion of elecfronic effects has concentrated so far on permanent features of the cliarge distribution. Electrostatic interactions also arise from changes in the charge distribution of a molecule or atom caused by an external field, a process called polarisation. The primary effect of the external electric field (which in our case will be caused by neighbouring molecules) is to induce a dipole in the molecule. The magnitude of the induced dipole moment ginj is proportional to the electric field E, with the constant of proportionahty being the polarisability a ... 

For isolated atoms, the polarisability is isotropic - it does not depend on the orientation of fhe atom with respect to the applied field, and the induced dipole is in the direction of the electric field, as in Equation (4.51). However, the polarisability of a molecule is often anisotropic. This means that the orientation of the induced dipole is not necessarily in the same direction as the electric field. The polarisability of a molecule is often modelled as a collection of isotropically polarisable atoms. A small molecule may alternatively be modelled as a single isotropic polarisable centre. 

The polarisation interaction between a dipole and a polarisable molecule can be affected by the presence of a ond dipole (right) and is therefore a many-body effect. 

This perturbation method is claimed to be more efficient than the fluctuating dipole method, at least for certain water models [Alper and Levy 1989], but it is important to ensure that the polarisation (P) is linear in the electric field strength to avoid problems with dielectric saturation. 

Ire boundary element method of Kashin is similar in spirit to the polarisable continuum model, lut the surface of the cavity is taken to be the molecular surface of the solute [Kashin and lamboodiri 1987 Kashin 1990]. This cavity surface is divided into small boimdary elements, he solute is modelled as a set of atoms with point polarisabilities. The electric field induces 1 dipole proportional to its polarisability. The electric field at an atom has contributions from lipoles on other atoms in the molecule, from polarisation charges on the boundary, and where appropriate) from the charges of electrolytes in the solution. The charge density is issumed to be constant within each boundary element but is not reduced to a single )oint as in the PCM model. A set of linear equations can be set up to describe the electrostatic nteractions within the system. The solutions to these equations give the boundary element harge distribution and the induced dipoles, from which thermodynamic quantities can be letermined. 

In the dielectric of a condenser the dipole polarisation would increase the polarisation charge and such materials would have a higher dielectric constant than materials whose dielectric constant was only a function of electronic polarisation. 

There is an important practical distinction between electronic and dipole polarisation whereas the former involves only movement of electrons the latter entails movement of part of or even the whole of the molecule. Molecular movements take a finite time and complete orientation as induced by an alternating current may or may not be possible depending on the frequency of the change of direction of the electric field. Thus at zero frequency the dielectric constant will be at a maximum and this will remain approximately constant until the dipole orientation time is of the same order as the reciprocal of the frequency. Dipole movement will now be limited and the dipole polarisation effect and the dielectric constant will be reduced. As the frequency further increases, the dipole polarisation effect will tend to zero and the dielectric constant will tend to be dependent only on the electronic polarisation Figure 6.3). Where there are two dipole species differing in ease of orientation there will be two points of inflection in the dielectric constant-frequency curve. 

When dipoles are directly attached to the chain their movement will obviously depend on the ability of chain segments to move. Thus the dipole polarisation effect will be much less below the glass transition temperature, than above it Figure 6.4). For this reason unplasticised PVC, poly(ethylene terephthalate) and the bis-phenol A polycarbonates are better high-frequency insulators at room temperature, which is below the glass temperature of each of these polymers, than would be expected in polymers of similar polarity but with the polar groups in the side chains. 

In the case of polymer molecules where the dipoles are not directly attached to the main chain, segmental movement of the chain is not essential for dipole polarisation and dipole movement is possible at temperatures below the glass transition temperature. Such materials are less effective as electrical insulators at temperatures in the glassy range. With many of these polymers, e.g., poly(methyl methacrylate), there are two or more maxima in the power factor-temperature curve for a given frequency. The presence of two such maxima is due to the different orientation times of the dipoles with and without associated segmental motion of the main chain. 

For non-polar materials (i.e. materials free from dipoles or in which the dipoles are vectorially balanced) the dielectric constant is due to electronic polarisation only and will generally have a value of less than 3. Since polarisation is instantaneous the dielectric constant is independent of temperature and frequency. Power losses are also negligible irrespective of temperature and frequency. 

With polar molecules the value of the dielectric constant is additionally dependent on dipole polarisation and commonly has values between 3.0 and 7.0. The extent of dipole polarisation will depend on frequency, an increase in frequency eventually leading to a reduction in dielectric constant. Power factor-frequency curves will go through a maximum. 

The dielectric properties of polar materials will depend on whether or not the dipoles are attached to the main chain. When they are, dipole polarisation will depend on segmental mobility and is thus low at temperatures below the glass transition temperatures. Such polymers are therefore better insulators below the glass temperature than above it. 

Pq the dipole or orientation polarisation P itself is defined by the Clausius-Mosotti Equation... 

Where dipole polarisation occurs it may be shown that... 

Because of a small dipole polarisation effect the dielectric constant is somewhat higher than that for PTFE and the polyolefins but lower than those of polar polymers such as the phenolic resins. The dielectric constant is almost... 

As the metallic particles are assumed to be sufficiently large for macroscopic dielectric theory to be applicable, we can substitute for a the expression for the polarisability of metallic particle immersed in an insulator. The dipole moment is given by the integration of the polarisation over the volume V. Thus, if the polarisation is uniform ... 

The quantum mechanics treatment of diamagnetism has not been published. It seems probable, however, that Larmor s theorem will be retained essentially, in view of the marked similarity between the results of the quantum mechanics and those of the classical theory in related problems, such as the polarisation due to permanent electric dipoles and the paramagnetic susceptibility. f Thus we are led to use equation (30), introducing for rK2 the quantum mechanics value... 

---