Plug flow reactors adiabatic reactor

Figure 17.1 presents a simplified flowsheet, as developed in Chapter 7. Fresh raw materials mixed with recycled toluene and hydrogen is heated up to the reaction temperature. The reaction takes place in an adiabatic plug flow reactor. The reactor outlet is quenched with recycled hydrocarbon to prevent coke formation. Finally, the reaction mixture is cooled at 33 °C, and separated in a flash vessel in gas and liquid. 

Adiabatic or isothermal reactor without axial or radial dispersion— ideal plug flow reactor (PFR) reactor... 

AJ Isothermal—always use a plug flow reactor (Bj Adiabatic... 

Adiabatic plug flow reactors operate under the condition that there is no heat input to the reactor (i.e., Q = 0). The heat released in the reaction is retained in the reaction mixture so that the temperature rise along the reactor parallels the extent of the conversion. Adiabatic operation is important in heterogeneous tubular reactors. 

For a single plug flow reactor optimum conditions for adiabatic operation are, obtained by varying the feed temperature so that the Average... 

The stirred reactor may be compared to a plug flow reactor in which premixed fuel-air mixtures flow through the reaction tube. In this case, the unbumed gases enter at temperature T0 and leave the reactor at the flame temperature T. The system is assumed to be adiabatic. Only completely burned products leave the reactor. This reactor is depicted in Fig. 4.50. 

For the plug flow reactor or any similar adiabatic system, it is also possible to define an average specific heat that takes its explicit definition from... 

Find the size of adiabatic plug flow reactor to react the feed of Example 9.5 (F q = 1000 mol/min and AO 4 mol/liter) to 80% conversion. 

EXAMPLE 9J ADIABATIC PLUG FLOW REACTOR WITH RECYCLE... 

The reactor system may consist of a number of reactors which can be continuous stirred tank reactors, plug flow reactors, or any representation between the two above extremes, and they may operate isothermally, adiabatically or nonisothermally. The separation system depending on the reactor system effluent may involve only liquid separation, only vapor separation or both liquid and vapor separation schemes. The liquid separation scheme may include flash units, distillation columns or trains of distillation columns, extraction units, or crystallization units. If distillation is employed, then we may have simple sharp columns, nonsharp columns, or even single complex distillation columns and complex column sequences. Also, depending on the reactor effluent characteristics, extractive distillation, azeotropic distillation, or reactive distillation may be employed. The vapor separation scheme may involve absorption columns, adsorption units,... 

Knowledge of these types of reactors is important because some industrial reactors approach the idealized types or may be simulated by a number of ideal reactors. In this chapter, we will review the above reactors and their applications in the chemical process industries. Additionally, multiphase reactors such as the fixed and fluidized beds are reviewed. In Chapter 5, the numerical method of analysis will be used to model the concentration-time profiles of various reactions in a batch reactor, and provide sizing of the batch, semi-batch, continuous flow stirred tank, and plug flow reactors for both isothermal and adiabatic conditions. 

Industrial reactors generally operate adiabatically. Cholette and Blanchet [8] compared adiabatic plug flow reactor to the CSTRmm. For exothermic reactions, they inferred that the performance of a CSTRmm is better than that of a plug flow reactor at low values of conversion, and vice-versa at high values of conversion. They further showed that the design considerations for endothermic reactions are similar to those for isothermal reactions. 

While the adiabatic batch reactor is important and presents many control issues in its own right, we are concerned here primarily with continuous systems. We consider in detail two distinct reactor types the continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTRj and the plug-flow reactor. They differ fundamentally in the way the reactants and the products... 

The primary reason for choosing a particular reactor type is the influence of mixing on the reaction rates. Since the rates affect conversion, yield, and selectivity we can select a reactor that optimizes the steady-state economics of the process. For example, the plug-flow reactor has a smaller volume than the CSTR for the same production rate under isothermal conditions and kinetics dominated by the reactant concentrations. The opposite may be true for adiabatic operation or autocata-lytic reactions. For those situations, the CSTR would have the smaller volume since it could operate at the exit conditions of a plug-flow reactor and thus achieve a higher overall rate of reaction. 

Inverse response creates control difficulties. Assume, for example, that we wish to control the exit temperature of an adiabatic plug-flow reactor by manipulating the inlet temperature as shown in Fig. 4.13. From a steady-state viewpoint this is a perfectly reasonable thing to consider, since there are no issues of output multiplicity or open-loop instability, assuming the fluid is in perfect plug flow and there is no... 

Figure 4.13 Proposed temperature control of adiabatic plug-flow reactor.

In Chap. 4 we mentioned that the simplest reactor type from a control viewpoint is the adiabatic plug-flow reactor. It does not suffer from output multiplicity, open-loop instability, or hot-spot sensitivity. Furthermore, it is dominated by the inlet temperature that is easy to control for an isolated unit. The only major issue with this reactor type is the risk of achieving high exit temperatures due to a large adiabatic temperature rise. As we recall from Chap. 4, the adiabatic temperature rise is proportional to the inlet concentration of the reactants and inversely proportional to the heat capacity of the feed stream. WTe can therefore limit the temperature rise by diluting the reactants with a heat carrier. 

It now looks as if we have achieved the best of all worlds a thermally efficient process with an easy-to-control reactor Can this be true Not quite. What we forget are the undesirable effects on the reactor that thermal feedback introduces. In Chap. 4 we explained in detail how7 process feedback is responsible for the same issues we tried to avoid in the first place by selecting an adiabatic plug-flow reactor. It is necessary that we take a close look at the steady-state and dynamic characteristics of FEHE systems. 

Just as we approached reactor control in Chap. 4, we will start by exploring the open-loop effects of thermal feedback. Consider Fig. 5.19, which shows an adiabatic plug-flow reactor with an FEHE system. We have also included two manipulated variables that wall later turn out to be useful to control the reactor. One of these manipulated variables is the heat load to the furnace and the other is the bypass around the preheater. It is clear that the reactor feed temperature is affected by the bypass valve position and the furnace heat load but also by the reactor exit temperature through the heat exchanger. This creates the possibility for multiple steady states. We can visualize the different... 

Figure 5.19 Adiabatic plug-flow reactor with feed-effluent heat exchanger and trim heater.

We start by plotting the temperature rise in the reactor. This is done by integrating the steady-state differential equations that describe the composition and heat effects as functions of the axial position in the reactor. The adiabatic plug-flow reactor gives a unique exit temperature for a given feed temperature. This also means that we get a unique difference between the exit and feed temperatures. The temperature difference has to be less than or equal to the adiabatic temperature rise at a given, constant feed composition. Figure 5.20 show s the fractional temperature rise as a function of the reactor feed temperature for a typical system. 

Figure 5.20 Normalized temperature rise in adiabatic plug-flow reactor as function...

Figure 5.2S Control of packed adiabatic plug-flow reactor with FEHE and bypass control.

---