Physical chemistry courses purpose

At the same time, as a chemist I was disappointed at the lack of serious chemistry and kinetics in reaction engineering texts. AU beat A B o death without much mention that irreversible isomerization reactions are very uncommon and never very interesting. Levenspiel and its progeny do not handle the series reactions A B C or parallel reactions A B, A —y C sufficiently to show students that these are really the prototypes of aU multiple reaction systems. It is typical to introduce rates and kinetics in a reaction engineering course with a section on analysis of data in which log-log and Anlienius plots are emphasized with the only purpose being the determination of rate expressions for single reactions from batch reactor data. It is typically assumed that ary chemistry and most kinetics come from previous physical chemistry courses. 

Experiments. The 48 experiments provide a balance between traditional and modern topics in physical chemistry, with most of the classical topics in Chapters IV-X (Exps. 1-24) and most of the modern topics in Chapters XI-XV (Exps. 25-48). These experiments are not concerned primarily with techniques per se or with the analytical applications of physical chemistry. We believe that an experimental physical chemistry course should serve a dual purpose (1) to illustrate and test theoretical principles, and (2) to develop a research orientation by providing basic experience with physical measurements that yield quantitative results of important chemical interest. 

The purpose of this book is to describe the present state of development of modem surface science at an introductory level to students of physical sciences and engineering. Junior standing in chemistry, physics, engineering, or the life sciences would qualify the student to take a course that would make use of this text. Teachers of introductory general chemistry courses usually given during the first year of university or college enrollment could use certain chapters (with deletions of some of the derivations) to supplement discussions of thermodynamics or catalysis, for example. We have used some of the chapters as supplementary material in our freshman and our core physical chemistry courses at Berkeley. The book should also be useful as a reference for professionals in need of data and concepts related to the properties of surfaces and interfaces. 

An integral part of a student s education in physical chemistry is laboratory/practical work. While it is generally accepted that the main purposes of laboratory work are to teach hand skills and to illustrate theory, significant problems have been identified in the science education literature about the laboratory courses, and in particular about the ineffectiveness of laboratory instruction in enhancing conceptual understanding (135, 136), and unrealistic in its portrayal of scientific experimentation (137). 

Towns and Grant (161) studied cooperative learning activities in physical chemistry, in particular in a graduate-level thermodynamics course. Their purpose was to describe the structure of events during these activities. The findings showed that students were moved away from rote learning strategies... 

The study of ions in gases is a part of physics, while the study of ions involution is classed as chemistry. Although this division seems somewhat arbitrary, the experimental investigation of ionic solutions is carried on almost entirely by electrochemists. The present book is therefore primarily addressed to students of electrochemistry and research workers in this field. To make the book as useful as possible for teaching purposes, problems have been inserted at the ends of many of the chapters. The author hopes that the work will be found suitable for graduate courses and seminars, as well as for individual study. 

Instruction in mathematics physics, and other branches of engineering was excellent, but there was no integration between chemistry and engineering,. .. A required course in surveying served no purpose in chemical engineering (24),... 

The primary distinction between analytical chemistry and radioanalytical chemistry is the nature of the transformations being examined. The analytical chemist is concerned with chemical transformations, brought on by the interaction of an atom s valence electrons with its physical environment. The radioanalytical chemist, on the other hand, is primarily interested in the nuclear transformation of a given atom. For practical purposes, the physical environment of the atom has no effect on the nuclear event. Consequently, many of the instrumental methods of detection most widely utilized in the normal course of analytical characterization have little use in the radioanalytical laboratory. 

---