Physical blending system

Over the last decade, the poor economics of new polymer and copolymer production and the need for new materials whose performance/ cost ratios can be closely matched to specific applications have forced polymer researchers to seriously consider purely physical polymer blend systems. This approach has been comparatively slow to develop, however, because most physical blends of different high molecular weight polymers prove to be immiscible. That is, when mixed together, the blend components are likely to separate into phases containing predominantly their own kind. This characteristic, combined with the often low physical attraction forces across the immiscible phase boundaries, usually causes immiscible blend systems to have poorer mechanical properties than could be achieved by the copolymerization route. Despite this difficulty a number of physical blend systems have been commercialized, and some of these are discussed in a later section. Also, the level of technical activity in the physical blend area remains high, as indicated by the number of reviews published recently (1-10). 

Molecular composites development has been concentrated primarily in physical blend systems in which rigid-rod aromatic-heterocyclic polymers functioned as the... 

In contrast to two-phase physical blends, the two-phase block and graft copolymer systems have covalent bonds between the phases, which considerably improve their mechanical strengths. If the domains of the dispersed phase are small enough, such products can be transparent. The thermal behavior of both block and graft two-phase systems is similar to that of physical blends. They can act as emulsifiers for mixtures of the two polymers from which they have been formed. 

For standard or proprietary polymer additive blends there is the need for analytical certification of the components. Blend technology has been developed for two- to six-component polymer additive blend systems, with certified analytical results [81]. Finally, there exist physical collections of reference additive samples, both public [82] and proprietary. The Dutch Food Inspection Service reference collection comprises 100 of the most important additives used in food contact plastics [83-85]. Reference compounds of a broad range of additives used in commercial plastics and rubber formulations are generally also available from the major additive manufacturers. These additive samples can be used as reference or calibration standards for chromatographic or spectroscopic analysis. DSM Plastics Reference Collection of Additives comprises over 1400 samples. 

Young s modulus of the block copolymer fibers compared favorably with that of the physical blends as shown in Table 6, and in general they follow the linear rule of mixtures. The modulus data suggested that one does not need very large PBZT molecules to have the reinforcing efficiency. From the tensile data, one clear trend is that the tensile strength of the block copolymer system is much... 

The number of PPE particles dispersed in the SAN matrix, i.e., the potential nucleation density for foam cells, is a result of the competing mechanisms of dispersion and coalescence. Dispersion dominates only at rather small contents of the dispersed blend phase, up to the so-called percolation limit which again depends on the particular blend system. The size of the dispersed phase is controlled by the processing history and physical characteristics of the two blend phases, such as the viscosity ratio, the interfacial tension and the viscoelastic behavior. While a continuous increase in nucleation density with PPE content is found below the percolation limit, the phase size and in turn the nucleation density reduces again at elevated contents. Experimentally, it was found that the particle size of immiscible blends, d, follows the relation d --6 I Cdispersed phase and C is a material constant depending on the blend system. Subsequently, the theoretical nucleation density, N , is given by... 

The basic issue confronting the designer of polymer blend systems is how to guarantee good stress transfer between the components of the multicomponent system. Only in this way can the component s physical properties be efficiently used to give blends with the desired properties. One approach is to find blend systems that form miscible amorphous phases. In polyblends of this type, the various components have the thermodynamic potential for being mixed at the molecular level and the interactions between unlike components are quite strong. Since these systems form only one miscible amorphous phase, interphase stress transfer is not an issue and the physical properties of miscible blends approach and frequently exceed those expected for a random copolymer comprised of the same chemical constituents. 

Fig. 48 Energy levels in the pristine polymers and blend system of PCNEPV and MDMO-PPV. Since the triplet state of MDMO-PPV is the lowest excited state of the system, excitations relax to it and diminish the possibility of charge carrier separation. Notation singlet (S), triplet (T), exciplex (ex), and charge-separated states (CSS) and transitions (ET = energy transfer CS = charge separation PL = photoluminescence ISC = intersystem crossing) between these states. Crosses indicate processes that do occur in the pure materials, but that are quenched in the blend. (Reprinted with permission from [229], 2005, American Physical Society)...

---