Phase-transfer catalysts matrix

A lot of convergent knowledge was rapidly acquired in these apparently different fields and an important consequence was that a huge number of structurally different phase-transfer catalysts were made available within a few years a most significant step was the immobilization of phase-transfer catalysts on a polymer matrix (12-16). 

Phase-Transfer Catalysts Immobilized into a Polymeric Matrix... 

The affinity of the polymer-bound catalyst for water and for organic solvent also depends upon the structure of the polymer backbone. Polystyrene is nonpolar and attracts good organic solvents, but without ionic, polyether, or other polar sites, it is completely inactive for catalysis of nucleophilic reactions. The polar sites are necessary to attract reactive anions. If the polymer is hydrophilic, as a dextran, its surface must be made less polar by functionalization with lipophilic groups to permit catalytic activity for most nucleophilic displacement reactions. The % RS and the chemical nature of the polymer backbone affect the hydrophilic/lipophilic balance. The polymer must be able to attract both the reactive anion and the organic substrate into its matrix to catalyze reactions between the two mutually insoluble species. Most polymer-supported phase transfer catalysts are used under conditions where both intrinsic reactivity and intraparticle diffusion affect the observed rates of reaction. The structural variables in the catalyst which control the hydrophilic/lipophilic balance affect both activity and diffusion, and it is often not possible to distinguish clearly between these rate limiting phenomena by variation of active site structure, polymer backbone structure, or % RS. 

The immobilization of phase transfer catalysts on solid substrates allows a clean reaction with no contamination of the products by the catalyst. Insoluble polystyrene matrices have been used as a solid support. The polymer matrix does not affect the velocity of the reaction, apart from steric hindrance with respect to the reagents. In the case of immobilization on modified silica the active centre is linked to the support by an alkyl chain of variable length. This length strictly determines the adsorption capacity of the polar support, which then controls the rate of reaction. A three-phase catalytic system is set up. Two distinct phases, containing reagents, come into close... 

Tundo, P., and P. Venturello, Synthesis, Catalytic Activity and Behaviour of Phase-Transfer Catalysts Supported on Silica Gel. Strong Influence of Substrate Adsorption on the Polar Polymeric Matrix on the Efficiency of the Immobilized Phosphonium Salts, ... 

Phase-transfer catalysts, such as the classic onium salts, crown ethers, and cryptands, have been immobilized on insoluble polymer matrices with various degrees of cross-linking. Their activity remains reasonably high if the catalytic centre is sufficiently far from the polymer backbone or if the resin is very porous. However, with phosphonium salts immobilized on silica gel die length of the hydrophobic chain between the active centre and the matrix and the solvent determine the adsorption capacity of the polar support, which then controls the rate of reaction. ... 

The above equilibrium exists in the water phase. The reactant (II) penetrates the polymer matrix more readily than reactant (I). In the bulk of the polymer, reaction (1) occurs leaving behind the phase transfer catalyst which migrates back to the water phase. In this way an equilibrium concentration of the phase transfer catalyst is established between the polymer phase and the water phase. 

One final note regarding the use of crown ethers as phase transfer catalysts there is little literature which directly compares quaternary ammonium catalysts with crown ethers in liquid-liquid processes (see Sect. 1.10) [48]. There are examples where both have been tried and are effective. In general, however, it appears that for solid-liquid phase transfer processes, the crowns are far better catalysts than are the quaternary ammonium ions. In order for a solid-liquid phase transfer process to succeed, the catalyst must remove an ion pair from a solid matrix. The quaternary catalysts have no chelating heteroatoms with available lone pairs which would favor such a process. The combination of a quaternary catalyst and some simple coordinating amine or ether would probably succeed [28, 32, 34]. It seems likely, as mentioned above, that it is the combination of diamine and quaternary catalyst generated in situ which accounts for the success of Normanf s catalysts [28]. It is interesting to speculate on the possibility of using a quaternary ammonium compound and a drop of water as a catalytic system. 

Application of immobilized palladium catalyst under the action of MW, with phase-transfer agents, has also been reported to promote the Suzuki reactions of a range of aryl halides and triflates in solvents such as water and ethanol under MW conditions [120, 121]. Similar results were obtained when aryl halides were attached to a PEG matrix as para-substituted benzoates [122]. It was found that conventional thermal conditions induced up to 45% cleavage of the benzoates whereas this side reaction was suppressed when MW conditions were employed. 

Therefore, one is dealing with a heterophasic reaction which could be controlled by typical kinetic factors such as a) formation and decay of active centers with time, b) presence of a multiplicity of active centers energetically, structurally and chemically different form one another and therefore having different kinetic constants. Moreover a role could also be played by true physical phenomena such as a) variety of growing chain lifetime depending on the different degree of active centers encapsulation in the polymeric matrix, and b) limitations to heat transfer and, above all, to mass transfer from the gas phase to the liquid phase, from liquid to polymer surface and from the polymer to the surface or to the interior of the catalyst. 

---