Perturbation methods Schrodinger equation

This makes it desirable to define other representations in addition to the electronically adiabatic one [Eqs. (9)-(12)], in which the adiabatic electronic wave function basis set used in the Bom-Huang expansion (12) is replaced by another basis set of functions of the electronic coordinates. Such a different electronic basis set can be chosen so as to minimize the above mentioned gradient term. This term can initially be neglected in the solution of the / -electionic-state nuclear motion Schrodinger equation and reintroduced later using perturbative or other methods, if desired. This new basis set of electronic wave functions can also be made to depend parametrically, like their adiabatic counterparts, on the internal nuclear coordinates q that were defined after Eq. (8). This new electronic basis set is henceforth refened to as diabatic and, as is obvious, leads to an electronically diabatic representation that is not unique unlike the adiabatic one, which is unique by definition. 

RPA, and CPHF. Time-dependent Hartree-Fock (TDFIF) is the Flartree-Fock approximation for the time-dependent Schrodinger equation. CPFIF stands for coupled perturbed Flartree-Fock. The random-phase approximation (RPA) is also an equivalent formulation. There have also been time-dependent MCSCF formulations using the time-dependent gauge invariant approach (TDGI) that is equivalent to multiconfiguration RPA. All of the time-dependent methods go to the static calculation results in the v = 0 limit. 

The difference between the Hartree-Fock energy and the exact solution of the Schrodinger equation (Figure 60), the so-called correlation energy, can be calculated approximately within the Hartree-Fock theory by the configuration interaction method (Cl) or by a perturbation theoretical approach (Mpller-Plesset perturbation calculation wth order, MPn). Within a Cl calculation the wave function is composed of a linear combination of different Slater determinants. Excited-state Slater determinants are then generated by exciting electrons from the filled SCF orbitals to the virtual ones ... 

The study of behavior of many-electron systems such as atoms, molecules, and solids under the action of time-dependent (TD) external fields, which includes interaction with radiation, has been an important area of research. In the linear response regime, where one considers the external held to cause a small perturbation to the initial ground state of the system, one can obtain many important physical quantities such as polarizabilities, dielectric functions, excitation energies, photoabsorption spectra, van der Waals coefficients, etc. In many situations, for example, in the case of interaction of many-electron systems with strong laser held, however, it is necessary to go beyond linear response for investigation of the properties. Since a full theoretical description based on accurate solution of TD Schrodinger equation is not yet within the reach of computational capabilities, new methods which can efficiently handle the TD many-electron correlations need to be explored, and time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT) is one such valuable approach. 

The second class of theories can be characterized as attempts to find approximate solutions to the Schrodinger equation of the molecular complex as a whole. Two approaches became important in numerical calculations perturbation theory (PT) and molecular orbital (MO) methods. 

In the Schrodinger equation (6) we take our zero of energy so that jF(x)dx=0. Inserting (15) into this Schrodinger equation, and assuming that all An are small compared with A0, we find by the usual methods of perturbation theory... 

Because of interelectronic repulsions, the Schrodinger equation for many-electron atoms and molecules cannot be solved exactly. The two main approximation methods used are the variation method and perturbation theory. The variation method is based on the following theorem. Given a system with time-independent Hamiltonian //, then if

well-behaved function that satisfies the boundary conditions of the problem, one can show (by expanding

[Pg.271]

There are essentially two different quantum mechanical approaches to approximately solve the Schrodinger equation. One approach is perturbation theory, which will be described in a different set of lectures, and the other is the variational method. The configuration interaction equations are derived using the variational method. Here, one starts out by writing the energy as a functional F of the approximate wavefunction ip>... 

Unfortunately, the stationary Schrodinger equation (1.13) can be solved exactly only for a small number of quantum mechanical systems (hydrogen atom or hydrogen-like ions, etc.). For many-electron systems (which we shall be dealing with, as a rule, in this book) one has to utilize approximate methods, allowing one to find more or less accurate wave functions. Usually these methods are based on various versions of perturbation theory, which reduces the many-body problem to a single-particle one, in fact, to some effective one-electron atom. 

Nice introduction to the basics of quantum chemistry, then a focus on semiem-pirical calculations and perturbation methods. Although published more than 40 years ago, the fundamentals, like the Schrodinger equation and wavefunctions, remain true, and the engagingly assertive style of the doyen of modem semiempiri-cal methods makes this book worth reading. 

Quantum mechanics (QM) can be further divided into ab initio and semiempiri-cal methods. The ab initio approach uses the Schrodinger equation as the starting point with post-perturbation calculation to solve electron correlation. Various approximations are made that the wave function can be described by some functional form. The functions used most often are a linear combination of Slater-type orbitals (STO), exp (-ax), or Gaussian-type orbitals (GTO), exp (-ax2). In general, ab initio calculations are iterative procedures based on self-consistent field (SCF) methods. Self-consistency is achieved by a procedure in which a set of orbitals is assumed and the electron-electron repulsion is calculated. This energy is then used to calculate a new set of orbitals, and these in turn are used to calculate a new repulsion energy. The process is continued until convergence occurs and self-consistency is achieved. 

In its actual implementation, the VBPCM method is based on the VBSCF method (see above). Thus, the wave function is expressed in the usual manner as a linear combination of VB structures, Equation 9.8, but now these VB structures are optimized and interacting with one another in the presence of a polarizing field of the solvent, by a self-consistent procedure. Within this model, the interaction between solute and solvent is represented by an interaction potential, VR, which is treated as a perturbation to the Hamiltonian H° of the solute molecule in vacuum. The Schrodinger equation for the VB wave function now reads... 

Variational methods [6] for the solution of either the Schrodinger equation or its perturbation expansion can be used to obtain approximate eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of this Hamiltonian. The Ritz variational principle,... 

In table 2 our result is compared with the UV spectroscopic result of Klein et al. [26], Also shown are the theoretical results of Zhang et al. [2], Plante et al. [27], and Chen et al. [28], The first of these uses perturbation theory, with matrix elements of effective operators derived from the Bethe-Salpeter equation, evaluated with high precision solutions of the non-relativistic Schrodinger equation. This yields a power series in a and In a. The calculations of Zhang et al. include terms up to O(o5 hi a) but omit terms of 0(ary) a.u. The calculations of Plante et al. use an all orders relativistic perturbation theory method, while those of Chen et al. use relativistic configuration interaction theory. These both obtain all structure terms, up to (Za)4 a.u., and use explicit QED corrections from Drake [29],... 

A general approach to the intramonomer correlation problem is known as the many-electron (or many-body) SAPT method88,141 213-215. In this method the zeroth-order Hamiltonian H0 is decomposed as H0 = F + W, where F = FA + FB is the sum of the Fock operators, FA and FB, of monomer A and B, respectively, and W is the intramonomer correlation operator. The correlation operator can be written as W = WA + WB, where Wx = Hx — Fx, X = A or B. The total Hamiltonian can be now be represented as H = F + V + W. This partitioning of H defines a double perturbation expansion of the wave function and interaction energy. In the SRS theory the wave function is obtained by expanding the parametrized Schrodinger equation as a power series in and A,... 

---