Periodic trends metallic behavior

In the preceding chapter we looked at the elements of the third row in the periodic table to see what systematic changes occur in properties when electrons are added to the outer orbitals of the atom. We saw that there was a decided trend from metallic behavior to nonmetallic, from base-forming to acid-forming, from simple ionic compounds to simple molecular compounds. These trends are conveniently discussed... 

Tellurium (m.p. 450 °C, density 6.25 g cm-3) is more metallic in its appearance, but it is not a good electrical conductor as are most metals. Polonium, on the other hand, is typically metallic in its electrical properties. Selenium and tellurium are best regarded as semiconductors, and sulfur is nonmetallic in behavior (an insulator). Thus, the usual trend from nonmetallic to metallic behavior is shown in going down Group VIA of the periodic table. All of these elements differ substantially from oxygen in their chemical properties. 

Write electron configurations of transition metal atoms and ions compare periodic trends in atomic properties of transition elements with those of main-group elements explain why transition elements have multiple oxidation states, how their metallic behavior (type of bonding and oxide acidity) changes with oxidation state, and why many of their compounds are colored and paramagnetic ( 22.1) (SP 22.1) (EPS 22.1 -22.17)... 

Understanding the wealth of information found in the organization of the periodic table is a central skill for general chemistry. You will always have a periodic table available for ACS exams, and likely for most classroom tests as well. Therefore, knowing the trends within the periodic table will allow prediction of properties, even for unfamiliar elements. Relative sizes of atoms and ions, trends in ionization energy, and trends in electronegativity are all important to understanding the behavior of elements. The differences between metals and nonmetals and their reactions are also based on periodic trends. Trends within families and trends within periods can both reveal much about the physical properties and chemical reactions expected for the elements. 

Ion formation is only one pattern of chemical behavior. Many other chemical trends can be traced ultimately to valence electron configurations, but we need the description of chemical bonding that appears in Chapters 9 and 10 to explain such periodic properties. Nevertheless, we can relate important patterns in chemical behavior to the ability of some elements to form ions. One example is the subdivision of the periodic table into metals, nonmetals, and metalloids, first introduced in Chapter 1. 

A knowledge of the behavior of d orbitals is essential to understand the differences and trends in reactivity of the transition metals. The width of the d band decreases as the band is filled when going to the right in the periodic table since the molecular orbitals become ever more localized and the overlap decreases. Eventually, as in copper, the d band is completely filled, lying just below the Fermi level, while in zinc it lowers further in energy and becomes a so-called core level, localized on the individual atoms. If we look down through the transition metal series 3d, 4d, and 5d we see that the d band broadens since the orbitals get ever larger and therefore the overlap increases. 

Many observations concerning these trends had been made over the years, and in the 1950s S. Ahrland, J. J. Chatt, and M. Davies presented a classification of metals based on their preferred interaction with donor atoms. Class A metals are those that interact preferentially when the donor atom is in the first row of the periodic table. For example, they prefer to bond to N rather than P donor atoms. Class B metals are those which interact better when the donor atom is in the second row of the periodic table. For example, a class B metal would bond better to P than to N. The following table summarizes the behavior of metal atoms according to this classification. 

Niobium (formerly called columbium) and tantalum are Transition Metals having a considerable affinity for oxygen donor groups they are thus called oxophilic see Oxophilic Character). They occur as mixed-metal oxides such as columbites (Fe/Mn)(Nb/Ta)206 and pyrochlore NaCaNb206p. Their discovery in minerals extends back to the beginning of the nineteenth century, when they were believed to be identical and called tantalum. Rose showed that at least two different elements were involved in the minerals, and named the second one niobium. Their separation was resolved around 1866, especially by Marignac. These metals often display similar chemical behavior as a result of nearly identical atomic radii (1.47 A) due to the lanthanide contraction see Periodic Table Trends in the Properties of the Elements)... 

Figure 8.17 The trend in acid-base behavior of eiement oxides. The trend in acid-base behavior for some common oxides of Group 5A(15) and Period 3 elements is shown as a gradation in color (red = acidic blue = basic). Note that the metals form basic oxides and the non-metals form acidic oxides. Aluminum forms an oxide (purple) that can act as an acid or as a base. Thus, as atomic size increases, ionization energy decreases, and oxide basicity increases.

In this study, the concentration data of Pb, Mn, Cr, and Cd collected in 13 cities over a 16-year period (1991-2006) were analyzed to characterize the environmental behavior of airborne metals under diverse held settings. As a simple means to examine the long-term variability of metal distributions, all data were analyzed after being grouped into the hrst half (period I 1991-1998) and the second half term (period II 1999-2004). These data were also analyzed across the entire study period to account for their long-term trend. Finally, the spatial variability of different metals was also assessed by comparison of their mean values among different cities. 

Actual global electrophilicity resembles the reference one especially for the transition elements contractions with a clear periodical behavior. In general in a period the alkali metal atom is the least electrophilic and the halogen atom is the most electrophilic. Since x is not calculated through the Slater approach, two different ways of calculating x and q may be the possible reason behind the observed unusual co trends in certain cases. 

General trends of zero charge potential behavior for electro-deposited platinum metals were formulated 20 years prior to the period of active thermodynamical studies of single crystalhne surfaces. In what follows we try to catch similarities and disagreements missed or scarcely discussed earlier. 

---