Periodic orbits open systems

For this system the optimum delay is t = f, i.e., one-quarter of the natural orbital period, since the reconstructed attractor is then as open as possible. Narrower cigar-shaped attractors would be more easily blurred by noise. ... 

The simplest way of approaching the limit of the infinite chain is to perform computations on finite systems of increasing number M of atoms and then extrapolate to M— oo. This is also the most physical in the sense that the finite systems are often real molecules. We will refer to this case as open chain. A second, more formal way is to impose periodic boundary conditions to the finite system of M atoms and then let M oo. This choice allows for faster convergence to the limit and it is often preferred in practice. Consider a cyclic polyacetylene molecule (annulene) composed of M = 2N -CH- units, disposed on a ring in the jc,y plane. After dimerization the molecule is composed of N monomers -CH=CH- this is the elementary cell of our system. We number the C atoms (or sites) by a cyclic index i = 0,. ..,2A — 1 indexes 2A, 2A + 1,... coincide with 0,1,... respectively. Two families of orbital energies are obtained [7] ... 

Another issue is development of methods suitable for very large systems. The challenges here are associated with necessity for more efficient and accurate representation of orbitals, more robust elimination of finite size errors for solids and surface calculations with periodic boundary conditions. Advancement in this area also imply certain progress in QMC-based dynamical methods. The issue of QMC approaches that treat nuclear and electronic problem on the same footing remains open. 

The unrestricted and restricted open-sheU Hartree-Fock Methods (UHF and ROHF) for crystals use a single-determinant wavefunction of type (4.40) introduced for molecules. The differences appearing are common with those examined for the RHF LCAO method use of Bloch functions for crystalline orbitals, the dependence of the Fock matrix elements on the lattice sums over the direct lattice and the Brillouin-zone summation in the density matrix calculation. The use of one-determinant approaches is the only possibility of the first-principles wavefunction-based calculations for crystals as the many-determinant wavefunction approach (used for molecules) is practically unrealizable for the periodic systems. The UHF LCAO method allowed calculation of the bulk properties of different transition-metal compounds (oxides, perovskites) the qrstems with open shells due to the transition-metal atom. We discuss the results of these calculations in Chap. 9. The point defects in crystals in many cases form the open-sheU systems and also are interesting objects for UHF LCAO calculations (see Chap. 10). 

One can think of two reasons to account for the remaining approximately 0.5 eV discrepancy between theory and experiment. On the one hand, other polarization processes, such as high-frequency lattice vibrations (phonon polaron), should be also included in the calculations on the other hand, in the work described the (iV 1) states were constructed from the HF iV-particle ground state, which of course is an approximation. One should actually use SCF open-shell crystal orbitals (COs for periodic chains or crystals in which the unit cell is an open-shell system) for these ionized states. The formalism to generate open-shell wave functions for crystals or periodic chains was developed more than 10 years ago< but has not been applied xmtil now. 

---