Pericyclic reactions aromatic transition state theory

Chapter 8 covers extensively pericyclic reactions and also includes the aromatic transition state theory. Most of the examples are taken from latest literature and are useful for postgraduate and research students. 

Another approach to analyzing concerted pericyclic reactions is based on the observation that the forbidden [2+2] cycloaddition involves a cyclic array of four electrons in the transition state, while the allowed [4+2] cycloaddition involves a cyclic array of six electrons. This is a familiar pattern that immediately calls to mind aromaticity, in which the ground states of molecules with four ir electrons in a cycle are destabilized and termed antiaromatic, while molecules with six tt electrons are stabilized and aromatic. Building off an earlier analysis by Evans, Zimmerman developed aromatic transition state theory. Simply put, reactions with a simple cyclic array of 4h + 2 electrons (commonly six) in a pericyclic transition state will be stabilized by aromaticity, making the reactions favorable. Note that the relevant electrons need not be exclusively in it orbitals a mixture of cr and it bonds in a cyclic array is acceptable. 

Once you get used to analyzing cyclic arrays of orbitals, aromatic transition state theory can be a simple and rapid way to analyze pericyclic reactions. As with the other approaches, it is well suited to some types of reactions, but less well suited to others. With practice, you will develop some instincts as to which model to apply to a given reaction. 

This is a very powerful rule, and it is especially useful when there are several components to a pericyclic reaction. With several components it is often difficult to identify the appropriate HOMOs and LUMOs for an FMO analysis, and difficult to quickly write an orbital or state correlation diagram. In such cases, aromatic transition state theory, or the generalized orbital symmetry rule, are the easiest approaches for analyzing the reaction. It is your decision as to which works best for you. 

We have introduced several different ways to analyze thermal pericyclic reactions. The highly formalized orbital symmetry analyses produce explicit rules, the conclusions of which are summarized in several tables. Other methods, such as FMO and aromatic transition state theories can be applied on a case-by-case basis, although they can be generalized in the same way. The realities are, in day-to-day chemistry, most pericyclic reactions will be familiar types or straightforward extensions of reactions we have covered here. 

Occasionally, though, you will run across a more exotic pericyclic process, and will want to decide if it is allowed. In a complex case, a reaction that is not a simple electrocyclic ringopening or cycloaddition, often the basic orbital symmetry rules or FMO analyses are not easily applied. In contrast, aromatic transition state theory and the generalized orbital symmetry rule are easy to apply to any reaction. With aromatic transition state theory, we simply draw the cyclic array of orbitals, establish whether we have a Mobius or Hiickel topology, and then count electrons. Also, the generalized orbital symmetry rule is easy to apply. We simply break the reaction into two or more components and analyze the number of electrons and the ability of the components to react in a suprafacial or antarafacial manner. 

Adopting the view that any theory of aromaticity is also a theory of pericyclic reactions [19], we are now in a position to discuss pericyclic reactions in terms of phase change. Two reaction types are distinguished those that preserve the phase of the total electi onic wave-function - these are phase preserving reactions (p-type), and those in which the phase is inverted - these are phase inverting reactions (i-type). The fomier have an aromatic transition state, and the latter an antiaromatic one. The results of [28] may be applied to these systems. In distinction with the cyclic polyenes, the two basis wave functions need not be equivalent. The wave function of the reactants R) and the products P), respectively, can be used. The electronic wave function of the transition state may be represented by a linear combination of the electronic wave functions of the reactant and the product. Of the two possible combinations, the in-phase one [Eq. (11)] is phase preserving (p-type), while the out-of-phase one [Eq. (12)], is i-type (phase inverting), compare Eqs. (6) and (7). Normalization constants are assumed in both equations ... 

The orbital phase theory includes the importance of orbital symmetry in chanical reactions pointed out by Fukui [11] in 1964 and estabhshed by Woodward and Holiimann [12,13] in 1965 as the stereoselection rule of the pericyclic reactions via cyclic transition states, and the 4n + 2n electron rule for the aromaticity by Hueckel. The pericyclic reactions and the cyclic conjugated molecules have a conunon feature or cychc geometries at the transition states and at the equihbrium structures, respectively. 

Density functional theory and MC-SCF calculations have been applied to a number of pericyclic reactions including cycloadditions and electrocyclizations. It has been established that the transition states of thermally allowed electrocyclic reactions are aromatic. Apparently they not only have highly delocalized structures and large resonance stabilizations, but also strongly enhanced magnetic susceptibilities and show appreciable nucleus-independent chemical-shift values. 

Three levels of explanation have been advanced to account for the patterns of reactivity encompassed by the Woodward-Hoffmann rules. The first draws attention to the frequency with which pericyclic reactions have a transition structure with (An + 2) electrons in a cyclic conjugated system, which can be seen as being aromatic. The second makes the point that the interaction of the appropriate frontier orbitals matches the observed stereochemistry. The third is to use orbital and state correlation diagrams in a compellingly satisfying treatment for those cases with identifiable elements of symmetry. Molecular orbital theory is the basis for all these related explanations. 

Although Otto Diels and Kurt Alder won the 1950 Nobel Prize in Chemistry for the Diels-Alder reaction, almost 20 years later R. Hoffmann and R. B. Woodward gave the explanation of this reaction. They published a classical textbook, The Conservation of Orbital Symmetry. K. Fukui (the co-recipient with R. Hoffmann of the 1981 Nobel Prize in Chemistry) gave the Frontier molecular orbital (FMO) theory, which also explains pericyclic reactions. Both theories allow us to predict the conditions under which a pericyclic reaction will occur and what the stereochemical outcome will be. Between these two fundamental approaches to pericyclic reactions, the FMO approach is simpler because it is based on a pictorial approach. Another method similar to the FMO approach of analyzing pericyclic reactions is the transition state aromaticity approach. 

More recently, molecular orbital theory has provided a basis for explaining many other aspects of chemical reactivity besides the allowedness or otherwise of pericyclic reactions. The new work is based on the perturbation treatment of molecular orbital theory, introduced by Coulson and Longuet-Higgins,2 and is most familiar to organic chemists as the frontier orbital theory of Fukui.3 Earlier molecular orbital theories of reactivity concentrated on the product-like character of transition states the concept of localization energy in aromatic substitution is a well-known example. The perturbation theory concentrates instead on the other side of the reaction coordinate. It looks at how the interaction of the molecular orbitals of the starting materials influences the transition state. Both influences on the transition state are obviously important, and it is therefore important to know about both of them, not just the one, if we want a better understanding of transition states, and hence of chemical reactivity. 

The concept of the Mobius strip was explained earlier (see p. 55). The basis of the Zimmerman analysis is an extension of this idea. A cyclic polyene is defined as a Hiickel system if its basis molecular orbital (i.e. the lowest filled TT-level as in the case of benzene, for example) contains zero or an even number of phase dislocations. Mbbius systems possess an odd number of phase dislocations in the basis molecular orbitals. In accordance with the rules predicting aromaticity for these systems, which results from the application of the Hiickel molecular orbital theory, it may be inferred that since cyclic conjugation also arises in the transition states of pericyclic reactions, the foDowing conclusions apply ... 

In a recent book Dewar (1969) has given a general account of the perturbation molecular orbital (PMO) approach and its relevance in discusrions on physical-organic chemistry. Of particular interest is one application which provides a general theory of pericyclic reactions (Dewar, 1969, 1971), The PMO treatment in this context has but one central concept, namely the potential aromaticity of pericyclic transition states (see p. 61), and may be generalized into a single definitive rule ... 

---