Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Performance Analysis — Amplifier Frequency Response

When we design a circuit with tolerance, we may sometimes want to find the worst case upper or lower 3 dB frequency with component tolerances. Unfortunately, calculating a 3 dB frequency requires that we find the mid-band gain and then find the frequency where the gain is 3 dB less than the mid-band. This type of calculation cannot be specified in the Monte Carlo/Worst Case dialog box. However, we can run a Monte Carlo analysis and then determine the 3 dB frequency using the Performance Analysis capabilities available in Probe. In this example, we will illustrate finding the maximum lower 3 dB frequency (FL), minimum upper 3 dB frequency (FH), and maximum and minimum bandwidth (FH - FL) for a common-emitter amplifier. Wire the circuit below  [Pg.528]

This circuit contains 5% resistors, capacitors with +80%, -20% tolerance, and a 2N3904 transistor that has been modified to include tolerance in p. The modified model is shown below. See Section 7.C for instructions on how to modify a BJT model. [Pg.529]

All distributions are uniform. We will run an AC Sweep in conjunction with the Monte Carlo analysis. Fill in the AC Sweep and Monte Carlo dialog boxes as shown below  [Pg.529]

Use distribution fiandom number seed Sava data from (an [Pg.530]

You may wish to reduce the number of Monte Carlo runs to reduce simulation time. 1000 was chosen to get a better sampling for the distribution. [Pg.530]


ACIS measurements were performed at frequencies between 1 mHz and 1 kHz using a Solartron Model 1250 Frequency Response Analyzer. Output from the comb specimens was amplified with a Keithley Model 427 Current-to-Voltage Converter before waveform analysis. Reference electrodes were not used owing to the geometry of the encapsulated test specimens. The data reported herein were obtained with a 0.1 V rms amplitude sinusoidal excitation waveform. In one experiment, DC bias was superimposed on this waveform. [Pg.319]

The site specific ground response analysis performed by equivalent linear approach shows amplification for C class site with PGA of 0.53 g, whereas B class site don t amplify the ground motion. The predominant frequency for C class site shifted from 2Hz to 1.7Hz whereas B class site did not alter the frequency content. [Pg.40]


See other pages where Performance Analysis — Amplifier Frequency Response is mentioned: [Pg.528]    [Pg.528]    [Pg.294]    [Pg.518]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.1841]   


SEARCH



Amplifiers

Frequency response analysis

Frequency responses

Performance Responsiveness

Response Analysis

© 2024 chempedia.info