Perfect pairing wave function

The perfect pairing wave function and the valence state of carbon... 

An alternative approach to improving upon HF wave functions is to include correlations between pairs of electrons more directly by means of two particle geminal functions, G xi Xj). The antisymmetrized geminal power (AGP), Pfaffian and perfect pairing wave functions are all examples of pairing wave functions each can be written as an antisymmetrized product of geminals,... 

Historically, MO methods have dominated trial-function construction because these functions are readily obtained from widely distributed computer codes. Recently, however, some QMC practitioners have renewed interest in a broader variety of wave functions including valence bond (VB) functions [44, 45], pairing wave functions, such as the antisymmetrized geminal power (AGP) [42, 43], Pfafflan, and perfect pairing forms [46]. 

In general, at least three anchors are required as the basis for the loop, since the motion around a point requires two independent coordinates. However, symmetry sometimes requires a greater number of anchors. A well-known case is the Jahn-Teller degeneracy of perfect pentagons, heptagons, and so on, which will be covered in Section V. Another special case arises when the electronic wave function of one of the anchors is an out-of-phase combination of two spin-paired structures. One of the vibrational modes of the stable molecule in this anchor serves as the out-of-phase coordinate, and the loop is constructed of only two anchors (see Fig. 12). 

Amovilli et al. [20] presented a method to carry out VB analysis of complete active space-self consistent field wave functions in aqueous solution by using the DPCM approach [3], A Generalized Valence Bond perfect pairing (GVB-PP) level... 

The product of bond wave functions in Equation 3.8, involves so-called perfect pairing, whereby we take the Lewis structure of the molecule, represent each bond by a HL bond, and finally express the full wave function as a product of all these pair-bond wave functions. As a rule, such a perfectly paired polyelectronic VB wave function having n bond pairs will be described by 2" determinants, displaying all the possible 2x2 spin permutations between the orbitals that are singlet coupled. 

This LBO-based wave function is not a VB wave function. Nevertheless, it represents a Lewis structure, and hence also a pictorial analogue of a perfectpairing VB wave function. The difference between the LBO and VB wave functions is that the latter involves electron correlation while the former does not. As such, in a perfectly paired VB wave function, based on CF orbitals, each localized Be—H bond would involve an optimized covalent—ionic combination as we demonstrated above for H2 and generalized for other 2e bonds. In contrast, the LBOs in Equation 3.65 possess some constrained combination of these components, with exaggeration of the bond ionicity. 

It follows from the above analysis that the rabbit-ears and canonical MO representations of the water s lone pairs are both perfectly correct, as they lead to equivalent wave functions for the ground state of water, as well as for its two ionized states. Both representations account for the two ionization potentials that are observed experimentally. This example illustrates the well-known fact that, while the polyelectronic wave function for a given state is unique, the orbitals from which it is constructed are not unique, and this holds true even in the MO framework within which a standard localization procedure generates the rabbit-ear lone pairs while leaving the total wave function unchanged. Thus, the question what are the true lone-pair orbitals of water is not very meaningful. 

The generalized valence bond (GVB) method was the earliest important generalization of the Coulson—Fischer idea to polyatomic molecules (13,14). The method uses OEOs that are free to delocalize over the whole molecule during orbital optimization. Despite its general formulation, the GVB method is usually used in its restricted form, referred to as GVB SOPP, which introduces two simplifications. The first one is the perfect-pairing (PP) approximation, in which only one VB structure is generated in the calculation. The wave function may then be expressed in the simple form of Equation 9.1, as a product of so-called geminal two-electron functions ... 

This strong orthogonality constraint, while seemingly a restriction, is usually not a serious one, since it applies to orbitals that are not expected to overlap significantly. On the other hand, the orbitals (

perfectly paired GVB wave function generated under the constraint of zero-overlap between the orbitals of different pairs. 

GVB Generalized valence bond. A theory that employs CF orbitals to calculate electronic structure with wave functions in which the electrons are formally coupled in a covalent manner. The simplest level of the theory is GVB PP (PP-perfect pairing), in which all the electrons are paired into bonds, as in the Lewis structure of the molecule. 

Fig. 6. Average relativistic effective core potential and relativistic effective core potential energy curves for two states of Bi2. HF, Hartree-Fock GVB(pp), eight-configuration perfect-pairing generalized valence bond FVCI, full-valence Cl based on the GVB(pp) wave functions FV7R, full-valence Cl plus single and double promotions to virtual MOs relative to seven-dominant configurations. (The FVCI and FV7R calculations include the REP-based spin-orbit operator.)...

---