Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Particle spherically confined

Before starting the discussion on confined atoms, we shall briefly describe the simplest standard confined quantum mechanical system in three dimensions (3-D), namely the particle-in-a-(spherical)-box (PIAB) model [1], The analysis of this system is useful in order to understand the main characteristics of a confined system. Let us note that all other spherically confined systems with impenetrable walls located at a certain radius, Rc, transform into the PIAB model in the limit of Rc —> 0. For the sake of simplicity, we present the model in one-dimension (1-D). In atomic units (a.u.) (me=l, qc 1, and h = 1), the Schrodinger equation for an electron confined in one-dimensional box is... [Pg.521]

The most general solution to the wave equation of a spherically confined particle is the Fourier transform of this Bessel function, i.e. the box function defined by ro- Such a wave function, which terminates at the ionization radius, has a uniform amplitude throughout the sphere, defined before (3.36)... [Pg.163]

Apart from this detail it follows that a spherically confined particle has... [Pg.131]

In all cases, the oscillatory structural forces appear when monodisperse spherical (in some cases ellipsoidal or cylindrical) particles are confined between the two surfaces of a thin film. Even one hard wall can induce ordering among the neighboring molecules. The oscillatory structural force is a result of overlap of the structured zones at two approaching surfaces. A simple connection between density distribution and structural force is given by the contact value theo-... [Pg.209]

In the previous sections, we presented several measures of the Hexperimental data. In this section, we shall use a combined theoretical and experimental input to obtain information on the H(f>0 interaction. The basic process is the same as before. We start with m solute particles at fixed positions but at infinite separation from each other in a solvent at some given temperature T and pressure P. We then bring these particles to a close-packed configuration. More specifically, we require that the centers of all the particles be confined to a spherical regions Sa, the radius of which is... [Pg.489]

Spherical micelles have constant size and their spatial distribution is essentially that of a point particle gas, confined within the volume defined by the quantity of aqueous solvent. By their one- or two-dimensional nature, the long cylinders and bilayers are more complex. They possess internal degrees of freedom affecting structure and physical properties of the phases they make up. [Pg.163]

Fig. 58 Mean-field density profiles obtained fiom self-consistent field theory simulations. A- versus B-rich domains are displayed for a blend of A- and B-homopolymers (a) and for AB-diblock-copolymer melts (b, c). In each case, all A-, and B-blocks contain equal numbers of monomers. Here, spherical confinement is implemented by blending either A- and B-homopolymws (a), or AB-diblock-copolymers (b, c) with C-homopolymers. The C-homopolymers act as a very bad solvent, thus enforcing the formation of A-, and B-rich spherical domains. In this case, the geometry of the confined polymer phases is studied in two dimensions. Whether Janus (a), core-shell (b), or onion (c) particles form depends on the number of monomers per block, and the interactirais between different monomer species. From (a) to (c), the length of A-, and B-sequences steadily decreases the sequences in (a) are roughly four times as long as in (b), and are about 15 times as long as in (c). To form Janus particles, the A-C versus B-C inlmactions need to be equal. To form layered structures, there has to be a significant difference... Fig. 58 Mean-field density profiles obtained fiom self-consistent field theory simulations. A- versus B-rich domains are displayed for a blend of A- and B-homopolymers (a) and for AB-diblock-copolymer melts (b, c). In each case, all A-, and B-blocks contain equal numbers of monomers. Here, spherical confinement is implemented by blending either A- and B-homopolymws (a), or AB-diblock-copolymers (b, c) with C-homopolymers. The C-homopolymers act as a very bad solvent, thus enforcing the formation of A-, and B-rich spherical domains. In this case, the geometry of the confined polymer phases is studied in two dimensions. Whether Janus (a), core-shell (b), or onion (c) particles form depends on the number of monomers per block, and the interactirais between different monomer species. From (a) to (c), the length of A-, and B-sequences steadily decreases the sequences in (a) are roughly four times as long as in (b), and are about 15 times as long as in (c). To form Janus particles, the A-C versus B-C inlmactions need to be equal. To form layered structures, there has to be a significant difference...
FIG. 11 Particles inside a spherical cavity. This is the generic case for a strongly confining situation. [Pg.759]

We have reported a simple, green, bench top, economical and environmentally benign room temperature synthesis of MSe (M=Cd or Zn) nanoparticles using starch, PVA and PVP as passivating agents. The whole process is a redox reaction with selenium acting as the oxidant and MSe as the reduction product. An entire "green" chemistry was explored in this synthetic procedure and it is reproducible. The optical spectroscopy showed that all the particles are blue shifted from the bulk band gap clearly due to quantum confinement. Starch capped CdSe nanoparticles showed the presence of monodispersed spherical... [Pg.179]

Once that the enhancement of the anisotropy due to the nanometric dimensions of the particle has been proven in our samples beyond doubt, the pertinent question is whether we can find the physical origin of this enhancement. A number of possible mechanisms can give rise to this strong variation in anisotropy size effects due to the increasing ratio of surface to bulk atoms, electronic confinement within the cluster leading to 3d band narrowing, surface oxidation, stress induced anisotropy, or even shape anisotropy due to a departure of sphericity. The two latter ones can be readily disregarded. The interatomic Co distance is estimated from the analysis of EXAFS spectra of these clusters. They are shorter than the bulk fee Co and comparable to that found for free Co clusters [11,12], Therefore... [Pg.11]


See other pages where Particle spherically confined is mentioned: [Pg.314]    [Pg.318]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.994]    [Pg.2908]    [Pg.2909]    [Pg.341]    [Pg.757]    [Pg.421]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.516]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.325]    [Pg.347]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.608]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.1110]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.210]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.421]    [Pg.548]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.131 ]




SEARCH



Particle confined

Particle sphericity

Spherical particles

© 2024 chempedia.info