Parity of orbitals

Now we shall solve the resultant set of equations (15.67)-(15.70) for the sums of a certain parity of orbital ranks and a given structure of spin and quasispin ranks to obtain... 

The sign of the last term depends on the parity of the system. Note that in the first and last term (in fact, determinants), the spin-orbit functions alternate, while in all others there are two pairs of adjacent atoms with the same spin functions. We denote the determinants in which the spin functions alternate as the alternant spin functions (ASF), as they turn out to be important reference terms. 

Figure B A qualitative molecular orbital diagram for ferrocene. The subscripts g and u refer to the parity of the orbitals g (German gerade, even) indicates that the orbital (or orbital combination) is symmetric with respect to inversion, whereas the subscript u (ungerade, odd) indicates that it is antisymmetric with respect to inversion. Only orbitals with the same parity can combine.

The theoretical reason is as follows. Although the placing of the ligands in a tetrahedral molecule does not define a centre of symmetry, the d orbitals are nevertheless centrosymmetric and the light operator is still of odd parity and so d-d transitions remain parity and orbitally Al = 1) forbidden. It is the nuclear coordinates that fail to define a centre of inversion, while we are considering a... 

The first two parts of the expression vanish exactly because of Laporte s rule, while the last two survive both parity and orbital selection rules to the extent that the mixing coefficients c and c are non-zero in noncentric complexes. 

A mistake often made by those new to the subject is to say that The Laporte rule is irrelevant for tetrahedral complexes (say) because they lack a centre of symmetry and so the concept of parity is without meaning . This is incorrect because the light operates not upon the nuclear coordninates but upon the electron coordinates which, for pure d ox p wavefunctions, for example, have well-defined parity. The lack of a molecular inversion centre allows the mixing together of pure d and p ox f) orbitals the result is the mixed parity of the orbitals and consequent non-zero transition moments. Furthermore, had the original statement been correct, we would have expected intensities of tetrahedral d-d transitions to be fully allowed, which they are not. 

The projection of the electronic orbital angular momentum is neglected in this adiabatic representation, and the parity of the electronic function under reflection through the x — z body-fixed plane, (Txz, is given by... 

Hybrid states of this sort are to be formed from structures with the same value of J and also with the same parity. The parity of a configuration is even in case that it involves an even number of electrons in orbitals with odd value of l (p,/, etc.) and odd in case that it involves an odd number of electrons in orbitals with odd l. In tables of spectral terms the parity is often indicated by use of a superscript ° on the symbols of states with odd parity. In the above example of neutral osmium the two configurations considered have even parity. 

In Chapter 1, we introduced the concept of parity, the response of the wave function to an operation in which the signs of the spatial coordinates were reversed. As we indicated in our discussion of a decay, parity conservation forms an important selection rule for a decay. Emission of an a particle of orbital angular momentum / carries a parity change (— l/ so that 1+ —0+ or 2 0+ a decays are forbidden. In general, we find that parity is conserved in strong and electromagnetic interactions. 

A corollary of this is that for a system of particles the parity is even if the sum of the individual orbital angular momentum quantum numbers /, is even the parity is odd if Xlt is odd. Thus, the parity of each level depends on its wave function. An excited state of a nucleus need not have the same parity as the ground state. 

As we have mentioned earlier, if spin-orbit interactions prevail over the non-spherical part of the electrostatic interaction in shell lN, then jj coupling takes place, and shell lN itself splits into subshells with j = l + 1/2 = Zip. Then, instead of the configuration lNocLSJ we have nl1 In this case l is preserved only to show the parity of... 

It is worth emphasizing that coefficients (20.29) and (20.30) do not depend on orbital quantum numbers. These numbers define only the parity of summation index k, following from the conditions of the nonvanishing of radial integrals in (20.27) and (20.28). For the direct term, parameter k acquires even values, whereas for the exchange part the parity of k equals the parity of sum h + h-If one or two subshells are almost filled, then the following equalities are valid ... 

Notice that the parity of an atomic state is determined by its electron configuration, not by its total orbital angular momentum. 

The two component states of orbital degeneracy in a diatomic molecule have opposite parity. As we described in chapter 6, parity is the symmetry label associated with the behaviour of a wave function under the space-fixed inversion operator E ... 

We see that the analysis of the hyperfine structure in this case provides a simple and direct way of distinguishing between + and " states. It depends on the precise form of the electron spin part of the total molecular wave function which is permitted by the Pauli exclusion principle. It has the advantage that it does not require a knowledge of the parities of the individual states. This contrasts with the traditional way of making the +/ - assignment which is based on a consideration of the orbital part of the wave function. 

The value of k is limited to k 21, where / is the orbital angular momentum of the electrons. For f electrons k 6 k must also be even based on parity of the matrix elements involved in the crystal field potential. Thus k = 2,4 or 6 for f electrons. Allowed values of q have to follow the rule q k. Any further restrictions on q are dependent on the symmetry... 

Here d is the z projection of the dipole matrix elements for the spinless S PZ transition of an outer electron. The factor (— )sw in equation (38) characterizes the symmetry in the arrangement of atomic dipoles in mixed S-P atomic states. Spin S and parity w of a molecular state are relevant either to the exchange of electrons (with atomic orbital fixed at nuclei) or to the exchange both of electrons and atomic orbitals. The exchange of orbitals (with atomic electrons attached to corresponding nuclei) is accomplished by the product of these two transformations. This explains the appearance of the spin quantum number in (38). 

It should be obvious that the concept of intrinsic parity for a particle is meaningful only if the forces that bind it are invariant under space inversion. The intrinsic parity of a system of particles is defined as the product of the intrinsic parities of the various particles times the parity of the relative orbital angular momenta. 

Classification Change of the quantum number of orbital spin, AL Change of the nuclear spin, AI Change of the parity log ft Examples... 

---