Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Parity factor

The set of spatial functions d>K, which may be either exact degenerate eigenfunctions of the Hamiltonian operator H or approximations to them, must then provide the associate representation D in which (using ep for the parity factor, 1 for P even or odd)... [Pg.372]

When nonadjacent operators are contracted we will use consistently the superscript type of notation, but when they are brought adjacently, the usual convention of overbar will be used. The meaning of the left side of eq.(22) is provided by the right side where the parity factor needed to bring the pair operators adjacent to each other explicitly appears. A similar meaning holds true for the fourth term of eq.(21). [Pg.179]

Because of the validity of eqs. (29) and (30), the completely contracted 9 s in any o can be brought adjacent to one another with a proper parity factor. We shall make use of this generalized version of our new Wick s theorem in our development of the Coupled Cluster theory in terms of tfa. The hamiltonian for the electronic system may be written as... [Pg.182]

NOTE PPP = purchasing power parity. Factors are measured as described in the text. indicates that coefficients are significant at the 10 percent level or better. indicates that coefficients are significant at the 5 percent level er better. [Pg.67]

The relative positions of points i, j in the superposition pattern are indicated in the two central columns and Pii=p,Pj, where the parity factor p, = l is assigned by giving +1 to an arbitrary position in an island, or to an end point in a chain, and then proceeding along the sequence giving 1 to alternate positions. For E-chains, the endpoint chosen is the one where the arrow points into the chain. [Pg.237]

Figure 3-22 shows a nucleophilic aliphatic substitution with cyanide ion as a nucleophile, i his reaction is assumed to proceed according to the S f2 mechanism with an inversion in the stereochemistry at the carbon atom of the reaction center. We have to assign a stereochemical mechanistic factor to this reaction, and, clearly, it is desirable to assign a mechanistic factor of (-i-1) to a reaction with retention of configuration and (-1) to a reaction with inversion of configuration. Thus, we want to calculate the parity of the product, of 3 reaction from the parity of the... [Pg.198]

The general problem simplifies considerably in the finite field. F[2. Because circuits are always counted at least twice, their number contributes a factor = 0 (mod 2) we see from equation (5.14), therefore, that the only structural information necessary to obtain Pi x) is that of the parity of disjoint edge distributions. Moreover, since there is no way to distribute disjoint edges among an odd number of vertices, equation (5.13) gives... [Pg.269]

Frustrated Loops. The period of a loop depends on whether or not it is frustrated . Consider the parity of the number of value inversions contained in a loop. If it is odd, the loop is said to be frustrated. In this case, a signal propagating around the loop has to go around twice before the loop returns to its initial state. Letting I be the number of site in a loop, the period of the loop is therefore equal to 2 X i for configurations with no symmetries, or an odd factor of 21 for certain special cases. In particular, a frustrated loop cannot have fixed points. [Pg.431]

It is clear that the tme nonequilibrium probability distribution requires an additional factor of odd parity. Figure 1 sketches the origin of the extra term. [Pg.40]

In the 45 years since its proposal, Frank s autocatalytic mechanism (Section 11.3, above) has spawned numerous theoretical refinements including consideration of such factors as reversibility, racemization, environmental noise, and parity-violating energy differences. [100,101] In contrast to the above examples of stereospecific autocatalysis by the SRURC, however, none of these theoretical refinements is supported by experimental evidence. While earlier attempts to validate the Frank mechanism for the autocatalytic amplification of small e.e.s in other experimental systems have generally been unsuccessful, several recent attempts have shown more promising results. [102,104]... [Pg.189]

In the limit of high rotation, it is possible to associate these A-doublet components with states where the half-filled orbital is either in, or perpendicular to, the plane of rotation. If the ions are thermally equilibrated, the e and/parity label states would each represent 50% of the population, implying a possible SIKIE on the order of a factor of two. However, there is no fundamental reason why El caimot have a propensity for producing a particular parity label state that could lead to SIKIE considerably larger (or smaller) than a factor of two. [Pg.177]

A summary of the symmetry analysis for the various isotopomers is presented in Table 5 where, in keeping with the conclusions of the general analysis, only ground vibrational states of the reactants are considered. Inspection of Table 5 indicates that isotopic substitution that preserves the CO2 centrosymmetry lifts the restriction based on I while preserving the restriction based on the e parity label state. Because C substitution will always preserve molecular centrosymmetry, the symmetry analysis predicts that ( 02)2 clusters containing a C isotope could show at most a formation-rate enhancement of a factor of two above that of (002)2- Also, because this symmetry restriction is independent of the detailed nature of the quantum states of the COj ions, the C SIKIE is predicted to be independent of the way in which the ion is prepared (i.e., E. Conversely, Table 5 indicates that when the COj centrosymmetry is removed, there are no symmetry restrictions to cluster formation. The extent to which the formation of (002)2 containing a ion will be enhanced above that of ( 62)2 depends on the e/f parity label state distribution of the CO2 ions, which, as was demonstrated in the O2/O2 study,can depend on E. ... [Pg.182]

In the last expression the sum goes over all nontrivial partitions of the lower labels, and of the upper labels, with a sign factor (1) depending on the parity... [Pg.300]


See other pages where Parity factor is mentioned: [Pg.260]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.302]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.290]    [Pg.260]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.302]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.290]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.394]    [Pg.577]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.448]    [Pg.265]    [Pg.405]    [Pg.609]    [Pg.408]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.355]    [Pg.221]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.500]    [Pg.685]    [Pg.325]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.313]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.255]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.10 ]




SEARCH



Parity

© 2024 chempedia.info