Oxidation products pressure dependence

Very recently, Hu et al. claimed to have discovered a convenient procedure for the aerobic oxidation of primary and secondary alcohols utilizing a TEMPO based catalyst system free of any transition metal co-catalyst (21). These authors employed a mixture of TEMPO (1 mol%), sodium nitrite (4-8 mol%) and bromine (4 mol%) as an active catalyst system. The oxidation took place at temperatures between 80-100 °C and at air pressure of 4 bars. However, this process was only successful with activated alcohols. With benzyl alcohol, quantitative conversion to benzaldehyde was achieved after a 1-2 hour reaction. With non-activated aliphatic alcohols (such as 1-octanol) or cyclic alcohols (cyclohexanol), the air pressure needed to be raised to 9 bar and a 4-5 hour of reaction was necessary to reach complete conversion. Unfortunately, this new oxidation procedure also depends on the use of dichloromethane as a solvent. In addition, the elemental bromine used as a cocatalyst is rather difficult to handle on a technical scale because of its high vapor pressure, toxicity and severe corrosion problems. Other disadvantages of this system are the rather low substrate concentration in the solvent and the observed formation of bromination by-products. 

Flosdorf and Chambers (1933) reported that metal sulfides were oxidized in the presence of audible sound (1 to 15 kHz) while investigating the bactericidal action of audible sound however, Schmitt et al. (1929) were the first researchers to observe the rapid oxidation of dissolved H2S gas to colloidal sulfur during sonication at 750 kHz with a 250-W power source. They reported that an increase in the total pressure of the system (P02) led to higher oxidation rates up to a limiting critical pressure. This critical pressure depended on the amount of dissolved H2S gas and the intensity of irradiation. The primary oxidation product was found to be elemental sulfur. The overall reaction was thought to proceed via reactions of HS with OH radicals, HO radicals, or H202. 

The chosen catalytic test reaction was the oxidation of phenol, which yields a mixture of catechol, hydro-quinonc, and 1,4-benzoquinone (Scheme I). The reaction was conducted at atmospheric pressure by continuously adding aqueous H2O2 to a mixture of catalyst, phenol, water, and a solvent (either methanol or acetone) at the reaction temperature (usually 373 K) reaction times were l-4h. Conversions and product sclectivities depended on the composition of this mixture under the best conditions, H2O2 conversion was 100%, phenol conversion 27%, and phenol hydrox-ylation selectivity 91%. The ratio of o />-substituted products (Scheme 1) was usually about unity. It was concluded that catalytic performance depended critically on calcination conditions, i.e. on the completeness of removal of the template. Many facets of the reaction remain to be investigated. 

The XH can be the parent hydrocarbon but is more usually an intermediate oxidation product with weaker C—H bonds, such as an aldehyde or alkene. Even so, the abstraction reaction has a large activation energy, as does the hydrogen peroxide decomposition (which is also pressure dependent), so that the branching mechanism tends to be of greater importance towards the higher temperature and pressure part of the region. 

It would appear that after the Induction period. Initiation is brought about by photolysis of the Initially formed oxidation products, and the O2 pressure dependence (Figure 17) Is attributable to the very low radical concentrations i.e. only at very low O2 pressures Is the radical flux higher than the available O2 concentration. Because of the low reaction rates. Intensity exponent data cannot be accurately measured, however, a low chromo-phore concentration (C), would lead to first order dependence on... 

Thus, although the reaction R +NO is very efficient, NO is not in fact a good radical trap, because of the complicating reactions due to the instability of the products, except possibly at the lower temperatures of 100-200° C. Thus, Phillips et have used NO in the study of the pressure-dependent decomposition of the isopropoxy radical. There are some similarities with the reactions of O, such as R--(-02 ROj- and O2-I-RH -> H02- + R-. Here, inhibition takes the special form of oxidation. 

Sulfur dioxide (SO ) and nitrogen oxides (NO ) are oxidized to sulfate and nitrate aerosols either homogeneously rn the gas phase or heterogeneously in atmospheric microdroplets and hydrometeors Gas-phase production of nitric acid appears to be the dominant source of aerosol nitrate because the aqueous phase reactions of NO (aq) are slow at the nitrogen oxide partial pressures typically encountered in the atmosphere (5,i5). Conversely, field studies indicate that the relative importance of homogeneous and heterogeneous SO2 oxidation processes depends on a variety of climatological factors such as relative humidity and the intensity of solar radiation (4, -1 ). 

The complex dependency of the yield of combustion products on the ammonia partial pressure indicates that various factors are influencing the rate of formation of this product class. If ammonia is only inhibiting the adsorption of propene, then the yield of combustion products is expected to follow the same trend as the yield of the partial (amm)oxidation products. Ammonia is not only consumed for the formation of acrylonitrile, but can also reduce the surface under the formation of e g. N2. This will change the degree of reduction of the surface, and hence the composition of the pool of oxygen species. If ammonia cannot... 

These effects were reflected by the change of selectivity to phenol upon a variation of the feed concentrations in Figure 5 Benzene selectivity to phenol shows the strong influence of benzene feed concentration on the product distribution. Upon increasing the benzene feed concentration from 2.1% to 12.5%, the selectivity to phenol increased from about 45% to nearly 95%. The influence of nitrous oxide feed concentration on selectivity to phenol is less pronounced. An increase of the nitrous oxide partial pressure led to a decreased selectivity to phenol. In the same way selectivity to benzoquinone increased. But due to a stoichiometric consumption of three molecules nitrous oxide per molecule of benzoquinone it is obvious that its selectivity is even more strongly dependent on the nitrous oxide partial pressure [6]. 

---