Oxidation metal-oxide interface

In botli cases, tire anodic reaction occurs by oxidation at tire metal/oxide interface ... 

Corrosion Control. Sihca in water exposed to various metals leads to the formation of a surface less susceptible to corrosion. A likely explanation is the formation of metahosihcate complexes at the metal—water interface after an initial dismption of the metal oxide layer and formation of an active site. This modified surface is expected to be more resistant to subsequent corrosive action via lowered surface activity or reduced diffusion. 

The logaritlrmic law is also observed when the oxide him is an electrical insulator such as AI2O3. The transport of elecuons tlrrough the oxide is mainly due to a space charge which develops between tire metal-oxide interface and the oxide-gas interface. The incorporation of oxygen in the surface of tire oxide requhes the addition of electrons, and if this occurs by a charging process... 

Case 3. Electros move very slowly. Oxide can grow (slowly) at metal-oxide interface or oxide-air interface depending on whether M diffuses faster than 0" or not. Example At... 

At elevated temperatures where titanium alloys could be the adherend of choice, a different failure mechanism becomes important. The solubility of oxygen is very high in titanium at high temperatures (up to 25 at.%), so the oxygen in a CAA or other surface oxide can and does dissolve into the metal (Fig. 12). This diffusion leaves voids or microcracks at the metal-oxide interface and embrittles the surface region of the metal (Fig. 13). Consequently, bondline stresses are concentrated at small areas at the interface and the joint fails at low stress levels [51,52]. Such phenomena have been observed for adherends exposed to 600°C for as little as 1 h or 300°C for 710 h prior to bonding [52] and for bonds using... 

Metal/environment interface—V ne cs of metal oxidation and dissolution, kinetics of reduction of species in solution nature and location of corrosion products him growth and him dissolution, etc. 

Fig. 1.76 Potential energy of an interstitial ion near the metal/oxide interface...

Oxide movements are determined by the positioning of inert markers on the surface of the oxideAt various intervals of time their position can be observed relative to, say, the centreline of the metal as seen in metal-lographic cross-section. In the case of cation diffusion the metal-interface-marker distance remains constant and the marker moves towards the centreline when the anion diffuses, the marker moves away from both the metal-oxide interface and the centreline of the metal. In the more usual observation the position of the marker is determined relative to the oxide/ gas interface. It can be appreciated from Fig. 1.81 that when anions diffuse the marker remains on the surface, but when cations move the marker translates at a rate equivalent to the total amount of new oxide formed. Bruckman recently has re-emphasised the care that is necessary in the interpretation of marker movements in the oxidation of lower to higher oxides. 

Fig. 1.84 Surface of a Cu-IONi alloy after oxidation in oxygen at 500°C, showing blistering, probably associated with CuO formation over voids at the metal/oxide interface (courtesy Central Electricity Research Laboratories)...

Several authors " have suggested that in some systems voids, far from acting as diffusion barriers, may actually assist transport by permitting a dissociation-recombination mechanism. The presence of elements which could give rise to carrier molecules, e.g. carbon or hydrogen , and thus to the behaviour illustrated in Fig. 1.87, would particularly favour this mechanism. The oxidant side of the pore functions as a sink for vacancies diffusing from the oxide/gas interface by a reaction which yields gas of sufficiently high chemical potential to oxidise the metal side of the pore. The vacancies created by this reaction then travel to the metal/oxide interface where they are accommodated by plastic flow, or they may form additional voids by the mechanisms already discussed. The reaction sequence at the various interfaces (Fig. 1.87b) for the oxidation of iron (prior to the formation of Fe Oj) would be... 

Much of the difficulty in demonstrating the mechanism of breakaway in a particular case arises from the thinness of the reaction zone and its location at the metal-oxide interface. Workers must consider (a) whether the oxide is cracked or merely recrystallised (b) whether the oxide now results from direct molecular reaction, or whether a barrier layer remains (c) whether the inception of a side reaction (e.g. 2CO - COj + C)" caused failure or (d) whether a new transport process, chemical transport or volatilisation, has become possible. In developing these mechanisms both arguments and experimental technique require considerable sophistication. As a few examples one may cite the use of density and specific surface-area measurements as routine of porosimetry by a variety of methods of optical microscopy, electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction at reaction temperature of tracer, electric field and stress measurements. Excellent metallographic sectioning is taken for granted in this field of research. 

As the film dissolves more oxide film is formed, i.e. the metal/oxide interface progresses into the metal, and the overall rate may be low enough to be acceptable for a particular process. In other cases, the corrosion products precipitate on the surface of the oxide and either accelerate the overall rate by enhancing diffusion of ions through the porous outer layers or, when less porous layers are formed, access of hydrogen ions to the inner oxide surface is reduced thus decreasing the rate. 

Figure 16. Activation barrier A for the formation of a breakthrough pore in a thin surface oxide film on metal as a function of electrode potential at two different surface tensions, om, of the metal/electrolyte interface.7The solid lines indicate the values of A b against Aand the dotted lines correspond to die critical potentials for the pore formation. ACd= 1 F m-2, a = 0.01 J m-2, h = 2 x 10-9 m, a, am = 0.41 J m 2 b, am 0.21 J m 2 (From N. Sato, J. Electmchem. Soc. 129, 255, 1982, Fig. 3. Reproduced by permission of The Electrochemical Society, Inc.)...

When rfc = 0, the polymeric structure is considered to be open enough (i = 0) that any subsequent oxidation will not occur under conformational relaxation control, hence P = 1. Every polymeric chain at the poly-mer/solution interface acts as a nucleus a planar oxidation front is formed that advances from the solution interface toward the metal/polymer interface at the diffusion rate. 

On the other hand, Doblhofer218 has pointed out that since conducting polymer films are solvated and contain mobile ions, the potential drop occurs primarily at the metal/polymer interface. As with a redox polymer, electrons move across the film because of concentration gradients of oxidized and reduced sites, and redox processes involving solution species occur as bimolecular reactions with polymer redox sites at the polymer/solution interface. This model was found to be consistent with data for the reduction and oxidation of a variety of species at poly(7V-methylpyrrole). This polymer has a relatively low maximum conductivity (10-6 - 10 5 S cm"1) and was only partially oxidized in the mediation experiments, which may explain why it behaved more like a redox polymer than a typical conducting polymer. 

When a zinc strip is dipped into the solution, the initial rates of these two processes are different. The different rates of reaction lead to a charge imbalance across the metal-solution interface. If the concentration of zinc ions in solution is low enough, the initial rate of oxidation is more rapid than the initial rate of reduction. Under these conditions, excess electrons accumulate in the metal, and excess cationic charges accumulate in the solution. As excess charge builds, however, the rates of reaction change until the rate of reduction is balanced by the rate of oxidation. When this balance is reached, the system is at dynamic equilibrium. Oxidation and reduction continue, but the net rate of exchange is zero Zn (.S ) Zn (aq) + 2 e (me t a i)... 

---