Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Overlap interaction simple metals

Before it is possible to interpret on a rigorous basis the behavior of the carbonyl stretching frequencies of a series of isostructural and isoelectronic complexes complete vibrational analyses are necessary. However, it is only within the last few years that far-infrared 137) and laser Raman 84) spectrometers have become available generally. Hence, in the general absence of the data they have provided, earlier complete analyses were limited to the spectra of simple metal carbonyls (for which such information was available). Even for these complexes, the number of force constants exceeds the number of observable frequencies, and model force fields had to be used. Since Urey-Bradley type force fields proved to be unsuitable for carbonyl complexes 86,105, 106), Jones 80-82) developed a resonance interaction valence force field which reduced the number of force constants by interrelating several on the basis of orbital overlap. This approach is not readily adaptable to less symmetrical substituted carbonyl complexes. Alternative models had, therefore, to be investigated. [Pg.200]

Simple metals Transition metals Interatomic interaction. See Overlap interaction Interatomic matrix elements. See Matrix elements Interbond matrix elements, 1441f Interfaces. See also Surfaces... [Pg.303]

In other words, we have expressed the interaction between the adsorbate and the metal in terms of A(e) and /1(e), which essentially represent the overlap between the states of the metal and the adsorbate multiplied by a hopping matrix element A(e) is the Kronig-Kramer transform of A(e). Let us consider a few simple cases in which the results can be easily interpreted. [Pg.239]

So far we have assumed that the electronic structure of the crystal consists of one band derived, in our approximation, from a single atomic state. In general, this will not be a realistic picture. The metals, for example, have a complicated system of overlapping bands derived, in our approximation, from several atomic states. This means that more than one atomic orbital has to be associated with each crystal atom. When this is done, it turns out that even the equations for the one-dimensional crystal cannot be solved directly. However, the mathematical technique developed by Baldock (2) and Koster and Slater (S) can be applied (8) and a formal solution obtained. Even so, the question of the existence of otherwise of surface states in real crystals is diflBcult to answer from theoretical considerations. For the simplest metals, i.e., the alkali metals, for which a one-band model is a fair approximation, the problem is still difficult. The nature of the difficulty can be seen within the framework of our simple model. In the first place, the effective one-electron Hamiltonian operator is really different for each electron. If we overlook this complication and use some sort of mean value for this operator, the operator still contains terms representing the interaction of the considered electron with all other electrons in the crystal. The Coulomb part of this interaction acts in such a way as to reduce the effect of the perturbation introduced by the existence of a free surface. A self-consistent calculation is therefore essential, and the various parameters in our theory would have to be chosen in conformity with the results of such a calculation. [Pg.6]

An early success of quantum mechanics was the explanation by Wilson (1931a, b) of the reason for the sharp distinction between metals and non-metals. In crystalline materials the energies of the electron states lie in bands a non-metal is a material in which all bands are full or empty, while in a metal one or more bands are only partly full. This distinction has stood the test of time the Fermi energy of a metal, separating occupied from unoccupied states, and the Fermi surface separating them in k-space are not only features of a simple model in which electrons do not interact with one another, but have proved to be physical quantities that can be measured. Any metal-insulator transition in a crystalline material, at any rate at zero temperature, must be a transition from a situation in which bands overlap to a situation when they do not Band-crossing metal-insulator transitions, such as that of barium under pressure, are described in this book. [Pg.1]


See other pages where Overlap interaction simple metals is mentioned: [Pg.493]    [Pg.378]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.315]    [Pg.433]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.404]    [Pg.477]    [Pg.537]    [Pg.5366]    [Pg.6293]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.388]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.728]    [Pg.467]    [Pg.491]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.725]    [Pg.1449]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.192]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.764]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.1301]    [Pg.359]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.308]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.564]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.349 , Pg.386 , Pg.389 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.349 , Pg.386 , Pg.387 , Pg.388 ]




SEARCH



Overlap interaction

Simple metals

© 2024 chempedia.info