Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Output indicators

The energy differences among conforiiiers relative to the ground state are 0.0, 0.85, 1.62, and 3.32 kcal mol . The relative populations of the states, judged by the number of times they were found in a random search or 50 trials, are 0.16, 0.21, 0.15, and 0.08 when degeneracy is taken into account. In the limit of ver y many runs, a Boltzmann distr ibution would lead us to expect a ground state that is much more populous than the output indicates, but this sample is much too small for a statistical law to be valid. [Pg.160]

To circumvent this need for calibration as well as to better understand the separation process itself, considerable effort has been directed toward developing the theoretical basis for the separation of molecules in terms of their size. Although partially successful, there are enough complications in the theoretical approach that calibration is still the safest procedure. If a calibration plot such as Fig. 9.14 is available and a detector output indicates a polymer emerging from the column at a particular value of Vj, then the molecular weight of that polymer is readily determined from the calibration, as indicated in Fig. 9.14. [Pg.644]

Design output indicators select rectifiers and capacitors. [Pg.27]

Gaussian output indicates the number of basis functions for a molecule in its output, just below the standard orientation ... [Pg.32]

Gaussian also includes a facility for estimating molecular volumes for SCRFsDipole calculations. An energy calculation run with the Volume keyword will produce an estimate value for Uq. For example, here is the output indicating the recommended value for Oq for formaldehyde (RHF/6-31+G ) ... [Pg.239]

In Figure 3.2, the same results were rotated and graphed. Additional results using different input and output indicators can be seen in Figure 3.3. [Pg.35]

Let us review what we did with the depression example so far. First, we conjectured a taxon and three indicators. Next, we selected one of these indicators (anhedonia) as the input variable and two other indicators (sadness and suicidality) as the output variables. Input and output are labels that refer to a role of the indicator in a given subanalysis. We cut the input indicator into intervals, hence the word Cut in the name of the method (Coherent Cut Kinetics), and we looked at the relationship between the output indicators. Specifically, we calculated covariances of the output indicators in each interval, hence the word Kinetics —we moved calculations from interval to interval. Suppose that after all that was completed, we find a clear peak in the covariance of sadness and suicidality, which allows us to estimate the position of the hitmax and the taxon base rate. What next Now we need to get multiple estimates of these parameters. To achieve this, we change the... [Pg.42]

Let us look at the typical case in more detail. Suppose we have k dichotomous indicators. The basic strategy of SSMAXCOV is to take a pair (any pair) of indicators as output variables and combine the remaining (k - 2) indicators in one scale. In other words, the input variable is the sum of scores on all indicators, with the exception of the two that were taken as output variables. Then, covariances of the output indicators are computed and plotted for each... [Pg.65]

First, we conjecture that each item is a separate marker of the taxon. Now there is a pool of indicators to work with. Second, we choose a random pair of indicators, for example, item 1 ( When I go shopping, I check several times to be sure I have my wallet/ purse with me ) and item 2 ( Before I leave my house, I check whether all windows are closed ), as the output indicators. Third, we sum scores on items 3 to 8, which makes a 7-point scale that ranges from 0 (none of the 6 checking behaviors are endorsed) to 6 (all of the 6 checking behaviors are endorsed) this is the input variable. Fourth, we calculate the covariance between items 1 and 2 in a subsample of individuals who scored 0 on the input variable, next we calculate the covariance for individuals who scored 1 on the input variable, and so forth. Fifth, we choose another pair of output indicators (e.g., items 1 and 3), and combine the other six items together to make a new input variable. This process is repeated 28 times until all possible pairs are drawn (1-2 and 2-1 are not considered different pairs). Next, we take 28 covariances from 0 subsamples and average them we do the same for all seven sets of numbers and plot the average covariances. SSMAXCOV plots look similar to the plots from the MAXCOV section and are interpreted the same way. [Pg.66]

To understand this formula better, suppose that the average nuisance correlation is. 33. Then MAXSLOPE will fail if the validity of the input indicator is three (or more) times greater than the validity of the output indicator. This limitation applies to both easy and difficult distributions. [Pg.83]

Where the scale activates an output, indicating that the desired weight has been achieved, the feeding equipment must stop operating immediately. Some feed devices may need a brake to eliminate coasting. Even if a feeder stops instandy, there will be a certain amount of in-flight added to the... [Pg.338]

The sequence indeed folds as desired. However, the output indicates that there are many alternative foldings, i. e., the structure is not well defined. [Pg.186]

The effect of the H2/oil ratio on the coke content of a NtV/SiOj catalyst (low HDS activity, thermal coke predominates) is shown in Figure 6. The distinct maximum of the coke deposited with the H2/oil ratio is apparent from both experiment and theory. Detailed analysis of the model output indicates that at low gas rates the VGO feedstock is mainly in the liquid phase throughout the reactor, whilst at the highest gas rates the reactor is operated in the gas phase already at the reactor inlet. In both limits the amount of coke deposited is modest. Intermediate gas rates (1000 Nl/kg), however, lead to much higher rates of coke... [Pg.163]

Evaluation of NMMS assumptions, components and complete systems is an important step to be made as soon as possible. The difference between the three purposes of Modelling, Monitoring and Alertness must be reckoned with in such evaluations. On the longer term more precise cost-benefit analyses will be possible, when the NMMS results in terms of the traditional output indicators (e.g. number of incidents) become visible... [Pg.82]

The purpose of this paper is to present an assessment exercise of a leaching pesticide using the PRZM model. The assessment begins with a calibration of PRZM for the pesticide aldicarb applied to tobacco in North Carolina and potatoes in Wisconsin. Following these calibrations, long term simulations are performed using these same calibration scenarios. Examination of key PRZM output indicates the "potential" for aldicarb to contaminate ground water in the scenarios modeled. [Pg.343]

The difference between input and output indicate how content of the... [Pg.511]

A problem commonly encountered in the development of both gas and liquid phase chromatographic methods of analysis is that of tailing. In such cases it is difficult to characterize the retention time of a particular species because of the long tail associated with the peak. Consider the detector output indicated in Figure PI 1.7. The time dependence of the effluent concentration of this species can he represented by... [Pg.361]

Input control switches include front panel controls, footswitch controls, and handswitch controls. To make operating an ESU more uniform between models and manufacturers, and to reduce the possibility of operator error, the ANSl/AAMl/lEC 60601-2-2 standard [6] makes specific recommendations concerning the physical construction of ESUs and prescribes mechanical and electrical performance standards. For instance, front panel controls need to have their function identified by a permanent label and their output indicated on alphanumeric displays or on graduated scales the pedals of foot switches need to be labeled and respond to a specified activation force and if the active electrode handle incorporates two finger switches, their positions have to correspond to specific functions. Additional recommendations can be found in Reference 6. [Pg.303]


See other pages where Output indicators is mentioned: [Pg.110]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.417]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.356]    [Pg.338]    [Pg.288]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.357]    [Pg.540]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.551]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.378]    [Pg.399]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.752]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.1576]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.40 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info