Outcomes final

Goodlad et al. [5] have analyzed the steps involved in the introduction of a new curriculum. In Fig. 2 these steps have been visualized. Usually the ideals for a curriculum are formulated, this is then formalized in a set of rules, by the relevant authorities. These rules are then interpreted by the teachers and used to design the lessons in the classroom. In the classroom, students experience the curriculum. The learning outcome finally is the attained curriculum. All these steps involve interpretations by the individuals working within each set. The difference between the ideal curriculum and the attained curricuhun therefore can be quite notable. 

Puetz V et al (2008) Intracranial thrombus extent predicts clinical outcome, final infarct size and hemorrhagic transformation in ischemic stroke the clot burden score. Int J Stroke 3 230-236. 

The methodology designed is conceived from a brief description of differential flatness systems concepts afterwards the concept of parameterization of routes is introduced, with the tracking method from one point to another in order to be implemented in the system. This analysis provides different graphical simulations that show the outcomes. Finally, a discussion is opened about the advantages of the implementation and future possibilities for studies. 

Figure 1.3 shows an outline of the analytical approach along with some important considerations at each step. Three general features of this approach deserve attention. First, steps 1 and 5 provide opportunities for analytical chemists to collaborate with individuals outside the realm of analytical chemistry. In fact, many problems on which analytical chemists work originate in other fields. Second, the analytical approach is not linear, but incorporates a feedback loop consisting of steps 2, 3, and 4, in which the outcome of one step may cause a reevaluation of the other two steps. Finally, the solution to one problem often suggests a new problem. 

Free-Radical Addition. A different outcome is expected in free-radical addition. The reaction of an a-olefin with a typical free radical affords the most stable intermediate free radical. This species, in turn, reacts further to form the final product, resulting in the anti-Markownikov mode of addition. 

Any major materials development programme, such as that on the eutectic superalloys, can only be undertaken if a successful outcome would be cost effective. As Fig. 20.10 shows, the costs of development can be colossal. Even before a new material is out of the laboratory, 5 to 10 million pounds (8 to 15 million dollars) can have been spent, and failure in an engine test can be expensive. Because the performance of a new alloy cannot finally be verified until it has been extensively flight-tested, at each stage of development risk decisions have to be taken whether to press ahead, or cut losses and abandon the programme. 

The reaction of diethyl tartrate with sulfur tetrafluonde at 25 °C results in replacement of one hydroxyl group, whereas at 100 °C, both hydroxyl groups are replaced by fluonne to form a,a -difluorosuccinate [762] The stereochemical outcome of the fluonnation of tartrate esters is retention of configuration at one of the chiral carbon atoms and inversion of configuration at the second chiral center [163,164, 165] Thus, treatment ofdimethyl(+)-L-tartrate with sulfur tetrafluonde gives dimethyl meso-a,a difluorosuccinate as the final product [163, 164], whereas dimethyl meso tartrate is converted into a racemic mixture of D- and L-a,a -difluorosuccmates [765] (equation 80)... 

The extent to which a particular combination of such "operating environment" factors will be perceived by the workers as being stressful will depend on the available resources such as the quality of the control panel, procedures, training, organizational and social factors, and, finally, the individual characteristics of the workers. The outcome of this transaction between stress factors and coping resources will influence the onset of worker stress. Situations are not stressful merely because of the presence of a number of external stressors, but because they are perceived as such by workers. 

Figure 4.4 gives an example of an OAET for events that might follow release of gas from a furnace. In this example a gas leak is the initiating event and an explosion is the final hazard. Each task in the sequence is represented by a node in the tree structure. The possible outcomes of the task are depicted as "success" or "failure" paths leading out of the node. This method of task representation does not consider how alternative actions (errors of commission) could give rise to other critical situations. To overcome such problems, separate OAETs must be constructed to model each particular error of commission. 

The case study has documented the investigation and root cause analysis process applied to the hydrocarbon explosion that initiated the Piper Alpha incident. The case study serves to illustrate the use of the STEP technique, which provides a clear graphical representation of the agents and events involved in the incident process. The case study also demonstrates the identification of the critical events in the sequence which significantly influenced the outcome of the incident. Finally the root causes of these critical events were determined. This allows the analyst to evaluate why they occurred and indicated areas to be addressed in developing effechve error reduchon strategies. 

Event Tree Analysis (ETA) A method for illustrating the intermediate and final outcomes that may arise after the occurrence of a selected initial event. 

When quality is not according to specification, the customary action is to do it over according to plan. However, this needs to be more closely examined in some instances. For example, if the work or material exceeds specifications, you may choose to accept it. If it falls short, you need to consider how much it deviates from specifications and whether the deficiency will cause the project to fail its performance evaluation. The final decision may be to have the work redone, but that is not an automatic outcome. 

Translated to Life s terms, this means that one cannot, in general, tell whether a particular starting configuration will eventually die out. There is no short-cut route to the final outcome of Life s evolution the best that can in principle be hoped for is to sit back and patiently await Life s own final outcome. Since Life is able to carry out any and all computations that a c onveiitional computer is able to, it can therefore be said that, in this sense, this rather unremarkable seeming rule is actually capable of displaying arbitrarily complicated behavior ... 

---