Ordinary calorimeter

B) Ordinary calorimeters no fixed relationship between Tq and Ts. These are inertial systems, characterized by a time-constant, and mainly include isoperibol calorimeters. 

Page 14, line 2 The method of Nernst, Koref, and Lindemann, by the use of the copper-calorimeter, determines the mean specific heat over a range of temperature. The mode of procedure is the same as in ordinary calorimetry, except that a hollow block of copper, the temperature of which is determined by means of inserted thermoelements, is used instead of a calorimetric liquid, and the method therefore made applicable to very low temperatures. 

Ordinary, with a central vessel and double-walled surroundings. Typical calorimeters mentioned in this group are the Thomsen mixing calorimeter and the Dewar vessel calorimeter. 

The Ordinary group totally enters the group of passive adiabatic calorimeters described in section 4.2. 

This classification still separates from each other the Adiabatic and the Ordinary (or Isoperibo)l calorimeters, but, under the heading of Isothermal or Extended Isothermal , introduces, as a whole, the family of calorimeters which are called, in sections 4,4. and 4,5 above, "Diathermal , a term certainly more appropriate than "Isothermal . 

The group making use of the mixing method mainly involves Ordinary or Isoperibol calorimeters, but, curiously, not all of them. This is because the term mixing method eliminates the isoperibol experiments -which do not make use of a liquid medium to store the heat evolving from the sample, like cement hydration carried out in a Dewar vessel... 

While we know that temperature differentials of order lOK do occur across the calorimeter cup under ordinary operating conditions, we cannot immediately conclude from this that similarly large drops occur across samples in the cup. Indeed if the ratio of the thermal conductivities of sample and of surrounding gas is large, so that the gas in effect provides thermal insulation, then the steady state temperature drop across the sample will indeed be small. Polystyrene and other good insulators, however, have thermal conductivities which differ from that of a gas only by a factor of about four, and samples of such material will be shown below to have in fact steady state gradients the same order of magnitude as those across the calorimeter cups. 

The similarity between these two equations is associated with the lack of bias. This sort of ordinary differential equation model relies on the calorimeter being adequately represented by a finite number of parts (here two) each of which has a uniform temperature. The heat transfer coefficients will be independent of temperature for a truly linear system (but the device can be regarded satisfactorily as linear as long as their values do not change significantly over the temperature range inside the calorimeter at any instant or from the minimum to the maximum of a modulation). Eliminating Tp, the model reduces to... 

Data in Table 11.10 from the Cone Calorimeter indicate that the burning behaviors of polymers are similar to those indicated by the data in Table 11.9 from the Fire Propagation Apparatus. Ordinary polymers (which are thermoplastics and melt easily) have very high heat release rates in the range predicted for the liquid pool fires. For example, for the boiling liquid pool fires of PE, PP, nylon 6, and ABS, 2di values at 50 kW/m are in the range of 1133-1304 kW/m from the Cone Calorimeter (Table 11.10) and 1004-1341 kW/m from the Fire Propagation Apparatus (Table 11.9). 

The accuracies obtained (better than 1%) exceed those of many other calorimetric methods and are definitely superior to the ordinary drop calorimeter for the determination of heat capacities and enthalpies of transformation and fusion. 

The ordinary drop calorimeter is widely in use - considering the limited number of substances to which it can be applied, rather too widely. Its application should really be limited to metals and stoichiometric compounds. If the substance undergoes a phase transformation in the temperature range studied or another solid-state phase change, the rapid cooling may produce undefined end states in the specimen. However, the resulting enthalpies may still be useful for approximate conversions of enthalpies of reaction from one temperature to another but should not be differentiated to obtain true heat capacities. 

Specific heats vary markedly from substance to substance, and vary to some extent with temperature for any given substance. Some approximate values under ordinary conditions are air (standard pressiure), 0,25 cal/g-deg water, 1.00 ice, 0.5 alcohol, 0.58 copper, 0,09. Heat measurements are made by mixing known amounts of reactants in a calorimeter (Fig. 5.1). The heat evolved by the reaction is equal to the heat absorbed by a known quantity of water, the metal bucket, the metal reaction chamber containing known quantities of reactants, the stirrer, and the thermometer. The heat capacity of the calorimeter is determined by putting in a known amount of energy and measuring the temperature rise. 

In a typical experiment, the test sample and a suitable reference material are contained in two separate, identical ampoules kept at constant temperature in separate, identically constructed wells of the calorimeter. Ideally, the reference material is identical or very similar to the test sample in mass, heat capacity and thermal conductivity, but, unlike the test sample, it is thermally inert (i.e. the reference material will not undergo changes that result in heat production or absorption under the conditions of the experiment). One example is a small quantity of ordinary glass beads in air at room temperature used as reference for the same amoimt of a hydrated ceramic material which is expected to lose water under the same conditions. Consequently, most of the noise arising from temperature fluctuations is removed when the reference data are subtracted. A feedback temperature control system between the wells (a) serves to ensure that the temperature difference between the weUs is zero and (b) provides an output that measures any difference in electric power requirement of one well relative to the other, needed to keep the temperature of both weUs the same. This power difference, as a function of time, is the output from the calorimeter, which is recorded continuously or intermittently over the duration of the test. 

---