Orbitals unrestricted

Unrestricted determinants are formed from unrestricted spin orbitals. Unrestricted spin orbitals have different spatial orbitals for different spins. Given a set of K orthonormal spatial orbitals, ... 

There are two techniques for constructing HF wave functions of molecules with unpaired electrons. One technique is to use two completely separate sets of orbitals for the a and P electrons. This is called an unrestricted Hartree-Fock... 

For systems with unpaired electrons, it is not possible to use the RHF method as is. Often, an unrestricted SCF calculation (UHF) is performed. In an unrestricted calculation, there are two complete sets of orbitals one for the alpha electrons and one for the beta electrons. These two sets of orbitals use the same set of basis functions but different molecular orbital coefficients. 

The advantage of unrestricted calculations is that they can be performed very efficiently. The alpha and beta orbitals should be slightly different, an effect called spin polarization. The disadvantage is that the wave function is no longer an eigenfunction of the total spin <(5 >. Thus, some error may be introduced into the calculation. This error is called spin contamination and it can be considered as having too much spin polarization. 

A spin projected result does not give the energy obtained by using a restricted open-shell calculation. This is because the unrestricted orbitals were optimized to describe the contaminated state, rather than the spin-projected state. In cases of very-high-spin contamination, the spin projection may fail, resulting in an increase in spin contamination. 

Conversely, an unrestricted Uartree-Fock description implies that there are two different sets of spatial molecular orbitals those molecular orbitals, /j , occupied by electrons of spin up (alpha... 

Notice that the orbitals are not paired /j does not have the same energy as /jP. An unrestricted wave function like this is a natural way of representing systems with unpaired electrons, such as the doublet shown here or a triplet state ... 

The unrestricted approach defines two different sets of spatial molecular orbitals—those that hold electrons with spin up ... 

You will need to decide whether or not to request Restricted (RHF) or Unrestricted (UHF) Hartree-Fock calculations. This question embodies a certain amount of controversy and there is no simple answer. The answer often depends simply on which you prefer or what set of scientific prejudices you have. Ask yourself whether you prefer orbital energy diagrams with one or two electrons per orbital. 

Although not strictly part of a model chemistry, there is a third component to every Gaussian calculation involving how electron spin is handled whether it is performed using an open shell model or a closed shell model the two options are also referred to as unrestricted and restricted calculations, respectively. For closed shell molecules, having an even number of electrons divided into pairs of opposite spin, a spin restricted model is the default. In other words, closed shell calculations use doubly occupied orbitals, each containing two electrons of opposite spin. 

Open shell systems—for example, those with unequal numbers of spin up and spin down electrons—are usually modeled by a spin unrestricted model (which is the default for these systems in Gaussian). Restricted, closed shell calculations force each electron pair into a single spatial orbital, while open shell calculations use separate spatial orbitals for the spin up and spin down electrons (a and P respectively) ... 

So far, we have considered only the restricted Hartree-Fock method. For open shell systems, an unrestricted method, capable of treating unpaired electrons, is needed. For this case, the alpha and beta electrons are in different orbitals, resulting in two sets of molecular orbital expansion coefficients ... 

A more general way to treat systems having an odd number of electrons, and certain electronically excited states of other systems, is to let the individual HF orbitals become singly occupied, as in Figure 6.3. In standard HF theory, we constrain the wavefunction so that every HF orbital is doubly occupied. The idea of unrestricted Hartree-Fock (UHF) theory is to allow the a and yS electrons to have different spatial wavefunctions. In the LCAO variant of UHF theory, we seek LCAO coefficients for the a spin and yS spin orbitals separately. These are determined from coupled matrix eigenvalue problems that are very similar to the closed-shell case. 

Here, occ means occupied and virt means virtual. In the restricted Hartree-Fock model, each orbital can be occupied by at most one a spin and one (i spin electron. That is the meaning of the (redundant) Alpha in the output. In the unrestricted Hartree-Fock model, the a spin electrons have a different spatial part to the spin electrons and the output consists of the HF-LCAO coefficients for both the a spin and the spin electrons. 

So far there have not been any restrictions on the MOs used to build the determinantal trial wave function. The Slater determinant has been written in terms of spinorbitals, eq. (3.20), being products of a spatial orbital times a spin function (a or /3). If there are no restrictions on the form of the spatial orbitals, the trial function is an Unrestricted Hartree-Fock (UHF) wave function. The term Different Orbitals for Different Spins (DODS) is also sometimes used. If the interest is in systems with an even number of electrons and a singlet type of wave function (a closed shell system), the restriction that each spatial orbital should have two electrons, one with a and one with /3 spin, is normally made. Such wave functions are known as Restricted Hartree-Fock (RHF). Open-shell systems may also be described by restricted type wave functions, where the spatial part of the doubly occupied orbitals is forced to be the same this is known as Restricted Open-shell Hartree-Fock (ROHF). For open-shell species a UHF treatment leads to well-defined orbital energies, which may be interpreted as ionization potentials. Section 3.4. For an ROHF wave function it is not possible to chose a unitary transformation which makes the matrix of Lagrange multipliers in eq. (3.40) diagonal, and orbital energies from an ROHF wave function are consequently not uniquely defined, and cannot be equated to ionization potentials by a Koopman type argument. 

This means that one has to be extremely careful in making physical interpretations of the results of the unrestricted Hartree-Fock scheme, even if one has selected the pure spin component desired. In many cases, it is probably safer to carry out an additional variation of the orbitals for the specific spin component under consideration, i.e., to go over to the extended Hartree-Fock scheme. In the unrestricted scheme, one has obtained mathematical simplicity at the price of some physical confusion—in the extended scheme, the physical simplicity is restored, but the corresponding Hartree-Fock equations are now more complicated to solve. We probably have to accept these mathematical complications, since it is ultimately the physics of the system we are interested in. 

The existing SCF procedures are of two types in restricted methods, the MO s, except for the hipest (singly) occupied MO, are filled by two electrons with antiparallel spin, while in unrestricted methods, the variation procedure is performed with individual spin orbitals. In the latter, a total wave function is not an eigenvalue of the spin operator S, which is disadvantageous in many applications because of a necessary annihilation of higher multiplets by the projection operator. Since in practical applications the unrestricted methods have not proved to be remarkably superior, we shall call our attention in this review mainly to the restricted methods. 

In the unrestricted Hartree-Fock method, a single-determinant wave function is used with different molecular orbitals for a and jS spins, and the eigenvalue problem is solved with separate F and F matrices. With the zero differential overlap approximation, the F matrix elements (25) become... 

If we except the Density Functional Theory and Coupled Clusters treatments (see, for example, reference [1] and references therein), the Configuration Interaction (Cl) and the Many-Body-Perturbation-Theory (MBPT) [2] approaches are the most widely-used methods to deal with the correlation problem in computational chemistry. The MBPT approach based on an HF-SCF (Hartree-Fock Self-Consistent Field) single reference taking RHF (Restricted Hartree-Fock) [3] or UHF (Unrestricted Hartree-Fock ) orbitals [4-6] has been particularly developed, at various order of perturbation n, leading to the widespread MPw or UMPw treatments when a Moller-Plesset (MP) partition of the electronic Hamiltonian is considered [7]. The implementation of such methods in various codes and the large distribution of some of them as black boxes make the MPn theories a common way for the non-specialist to tentatively include, with more or less relevancy, correlation effects in the calculations. 

The most famous case concerns the symmetry breaking in the Hartree-Fock approximation. The phenomenon appeared on elementary problems, such as H2, when the so-called unrestricted Hartree-Fock algorithms were tried. The unrestricted Hartree-Fock formalism, using different orbitals for a and p electrons, was first proposed by G. Berthier [5] in 1954 (and immediately after J.A. Pople [6] ) for problems where the number of a andp electrons were different. This formulation takes the freedom to deviate from the constraints of being an eigenfunction. 

Unrestricted monodeterminantal treatments using different orbitals for different spins for open-shell systems (free radicals, triplet states, etc.) [41,42],... 

In the HF scheme, the first origin of the correlation between electrons of antiparallel spins comes from the restriction that they are forced to occupy the same orbital (RHF scheme) and thus some of the same location in space. A simple way of taking into account the basic effects of the electronic correlation is to release the constraint of double occupation (UHF scheme = Unrestricted HF) and so use Different Orbitals for Different Spins (DODS scheme which is the European way of calling UHF). In this methodology, electrons with antiparallel spins are not found to doubly occupy the same orbital so that, in principle, they are not forced to coexist in the same spatial region as is the case in usual RHF wave functions. 

The wave funetion obtained eorresponds to the Unrestricted Hartree-Fock scheme and beeomes equivalent to the RHF ease if the orbitals (t>a and (()p are the same. In this UHF form, the UHF wave funetion obeys the Pauli prineiple but is not an eigenfunction of the total spin operator and is thus a mixture of different spin multiplicities. In the present two-eleetron case, an alternative form of the wave funetion which has the same total energy, which is a pure singlet state, but whieh is no longer antisymmetric as required by thePauli principle, is ... 

Table 5.2 Contributions to the electron density at the iron nucleus in Fep4 unrestricted B3LYP calculations with the CP(PPP) basis set. Orbitals that electron density at the iron nucleus are printed in boldface...

In a crystal-field picture, the electronic structure of iron in the five-coordinate compounds is usually best represented by a (d yf idyz, 4cz) ( zO configuration [66, 70], as convincingly borne out by spin-unrestricted DFT calculations on the Jager compound 20 [68]. The intermediate spin configuration with an empty d 2 yi orbital in the CF model, however, has a vanishing valence contribution to the... 

Both Fe(ll)(TPP) and Fe(II)(OEP) have positive electric quadrupole splitting without significant temperature dependence which, however, cannot be satisfactorily explained within the crystal field model [117]. Spin-restricted and spin-unrestricted Xoi multiple scattering calculations revealed large asymmetry in the population of the valence orbitals and appreciable 4p contributions to the EFG [153] which then was further specified by ab initio and DFT calculations [154,155]. 

---