Orbitals native

In the PP theory, the valence electron wave function is composed of two parts. The main part is the pseudo-wave function describing a relatively smooth-varying behavior of the electron. The second part describes a spatially rapid oscillation of the valence electron near the atomic core. This atomic-electron-like behavior is due to the fact that, passing the vicinity of an atom, the valence electron recalls its native outermost atomic orbitals under a relatively stronger atomic potential near the core. Quantum mechanically the situation corresponds to the fact that the valence electronic state should be orthogonal to the inner-core electronic states. The second part describes this CO. The CO terms explicitly contain the information of atomic position and atomic core orbitals. 

Chromium has a similar electron configuration to Cu, because both have an outer electronic orbit of 4s. Since Cr3+, the most stable form, has a similar ionic radius (0.64 A0) to Mg (0.65 A0), it is possible that Cr3+ could readily substitute for Mg in silicates. Chromium has a lower electronegativity (1.6) than Cu2+ (2.0) and Ni (1.8). It is assumed that when substitution in an ionic crystal is possible, the element having a lower electronegativity will be preferred because of its ability to form a more ionic bond (McBride, 1981). Since chromium has an ionic radius similar to trivalent Fe (0.65°A), it can also substitute for Fe3+ in iron oxides. This may explain the observations (Han and Banin, 1997, 1999 Han et al., 2001a, c) that the native Cr in arid soils is mostly and strongly bound in the clay mineral structure and iron oxides compared to other heavy metals studied. On the other hand, humic acids have a high affinity with Cr (III) similar to Cu (Adriano, 1986). The chromium in most soils probably occurs as Cr (III) (Adriano, 1986). The chromium (III) in soils, especially when bound to... 

Thus, HRP-I (green) and HRP-II (red) have oxidation states higher than the native Fe(III) state by two and one, respectively. It has been found that both intermediates are oxoferryl (Fe(IV)) porphyrins and that HRP-II is low spin Fe(IV), whereas HRP-I is its jr-cation radical, which is one electron deficient in the porphyrin jr-orbital of HRP-II. 

Three main tendencies have been underlined in recent studies of structure and action mechanism ofbacterial photosynthetic reaction centers. The crystallographic structure of the reaction centers from Rps. viridis and Rb. spheroids was initially determined to be 2.8 and 3 A resolutions (Michel and Deisenhofer et al., 1985 Allen et al., 1986). Resolution and refinement of these structures have been subsequently extended to 2.2, 2.3 and 2.6 A. (Rees et al., 1989 Stowell et al., 1997, Fyfe and Johns, 2000 Rutherford and Faller, 2001). Investigations of the electronic structure of donor and acceptor centers in the ground and exited states by modern physical methods with a combination ofpico-and femtosecond kinetic techniques have become more precise and elaborate. Extensive experimental and theoretical investigations on the role of orbital overlap and protein dynamics in the processes of electron and proton transfer have been done. All the above-mentioned research directions are accompanied by extensive use of methods of sit-directed mutagenesis and substitution of native pigments for artificial compounds of different redox potential. 

This analysis suggests that carbon adopts a set of atomic orbitals other than its native 2s and 2p orbitals to bond to the hydrogen atoms in forming the methane molecule. In fact, it is not surprising that the 2s and 2p orbitals present on an isolated carbon atom might not be the best set of orbitals for bonding. That is, a different set of atomic orbitals might better serve the carbon atom to form the most stable CH4 molecule. 

The "native" 2s and three 2p atomic orbitals characteristic of a free carbon atom are combined to form a new set of four sp3 orbitals. The small lobes of the orbitals are usually omitted from diagrams for clarity. 

Hybridization a mixing of the native orbitals on a given atom to form special atomic orbitals for bonding. (14.1) Hydration the interaction between solute particles and water molecules. (4.1)... 

Essentially, this Table is based upon the distribution of electrons amongst four sets of orbitals labelled s, p, d, and f and is comprised of the main group elements, with the completion of s and p orbitals, the transition elements, with the completion of electron shells for the d orbitals, and then the inner-transition elements, known as the lantha-nons and actinons, with the completion of f orbitals. All of these transition and inner-transition elements are metals in their native state, whereas the elements to the top right-hand side of the main group of the Periodic Table tend to be non-metals. 

Once the dominant FMO interaction has been identified, then a choice as to which regiochemical outcome is preferred is based upon a comparison of the sizes of the coefficients at the atomic orbital centers involved in the formation of the new bonds. Consequently, at least a qualitative knowledge of the form of the FMOs is useful in assessing the relative merits of one over the oAer regiochemical outcome. If, as is usually but not always vide infra) the case, the coefficients in both the HOMO and the LUMO differ in size, then the new overlap can occur in either of two ways. It can readily be shown, however, that overlap between the atomic orbitals with the larger coefficients (and, by default, the two centers with the smaller atomic orbital coefficients overlap at the other site of bond formation) is preferred over the alter-native. ... 

Hybrid orbitals, which are combinations of the "native" atomic orbitals, are often required to account for the molecular structure... 

---