Optimization of the other parameters

The mobile phase can be optimized following the method outlined above, as a matter 

Then there are other parameters whose choice is not so compelling stationary phase, temperature, pH (or other ionic effects) and secondary chemical equilibria, 

A mixture of six compounds with different acid and base properties was separated isocratically on a reversed Cig phase. The influencing parameters that needed to be optimized simultaneously were the methanol content (%B) and the pH of the mobile phase. For systematic optimization it was necessary to perform a limited number of 

Optimization may be systematic, as in the example shown, or directed and both processes can be automated. Systematic optimization means that the interesting 

Automatic optimization requires an efficient computer system to establish whether one separation is better than another. A so-called resolution function , for which various dihnitions have been proposed, is used as an objective criterion, covering resolution between neighbouring peaks and the analysis time involved. Identihcation by the computer of individual peaks, whether by the injection of standards or by spectroscopic means, is a distinct advantage. The simplex process may be used to optimize automatically the separation of complex acid-base mixtures by simultaneous variation of pH, ion pair reagent concentration, composition of ternary mobile phase, flow rate and temperature. Some automatic optimization systems are available commercially and, although they do leave some room for improvement, there is no doubt that they provide satisfactory answers to a great many problems. 

The mobile phase can be optimized following the method outlined above, as a matter of routine. The completeness of the method is particularly striking mobile phase components are not chosen at random but according to their position in the selectivity triangle and the sum of all components always totals 100%. 

A mixture of six compounds with different acid and base properties was separated isocratically on a reversed C ig phase. The influencing parameters that needed to be optimized simultaneously were the methanol content (% B) and the pH of the mobile phase. For systematic optimization it was necessary to perform a limited number of experiments within the boundaries 45-65% B and pH 3.0-6.0. The results, i.e. the minimum resolution of the critical peak pair as a function of these parameters, were evaluated mathematically and represented as a surface in three-dimensional space (similar to Fig 18.15). It could be 

Besides separation quality (resolution of the critical peak pair) one needs to consider the ruggedness of a method. It is not favourable at all to work at conditions where small fluctuations of the method, such as an unwanted change in pH, strongly influence the quality criterion. For routine separations it is much better to work under rugged conditions, even if this means a certain decrease in resolution. A hypothetical example is shown in Fig. 18.15 where the lower quality conditions at point B have markedly higher ruggedness than a method located at the maximum point A. 

---

The reaction rate is also directly proportional to the concentration of iodide (Figure 4). However, it is undesirable to maintain high concentrations of iodine because of its high molecular weight. With optimization of the other reaction parameters, the concen-... 

The described experiments will have to be continued and other, arid more sophisticated experiments need to be designed in order to unravel at least the most important basic processes in laser desorption. Hopefully a better understanding of these processes will then lead to an optimization of the instrumental parameters for a given analysis. 

If only mixtures of a given eluotropic strength are considered as the result of a gradient scan, then a further optimization of the primary parameter (solvent eluotropic strength) is not contemplated and the number of parameters involved in the optimization process is effectively reduced by one. In the optimization of a ternary mobile phase composition one of the three volume fractions is defined by the two others, as their sum must equal one. 

These general guidelines can be applied in both qualitative and quantitative analysis. Optimization approaches are generally of more value in quantitative than in qualitative analysis. In order to obtain the lowest possible detection limits in thermospray LC/MS the system has to be optimized for each compound or group of compounds. This optimization procedure has to be repeated before each experimental series, because the parameters which cannot be systematically adjusted, such as the condition of the vaporizer and the degree of contamination, can dramatically influence the optimum settings of the other parameters. The use of isotopically labelled internal standards is advised in order to avoid the influence of the unpredictable parameters. The usefulness of extensive optimization in qualitative analysis with thermospray LC/MS can be questioned. 

The operative parameters which can be regulated to optimize the stack performance are MEA humidification, reactant pressure, stack temperature, and stoichiometric ratio. While the role of membrane humidification, already partially discussed in Sect. 3.2, is closely considered in Sect. 4.5 and in case studies (Chaps. 6 and 7), the influence of the other parameters is examined here with reference to the stack of Fig. 3.5. These effects have already been described from a thermodynamic point of view (see Sect. 3.1), while kinetic implications are considered in this section for their importance in determining the stack efficiency. 

If ethylene (I) is twisted by 10° energy minimization leads to structure II, with an energy 7.1 kcal/mol above that of I. Upon distortion of one pair of synplanar (or synperiplanar) hydrogens out of the original plane each by 10° and optimization of all other parameters, the relaxed structure III, with a... 

The information that may be obtained from an NMR spectrum depends to some extent on the experimental parameters used to record the spectrum. Before recording an NMR spectrum a number of acquisition parameters have to be defined which depend on both the type of sample and the pulse sequence being used. Often the various parameters interact with each other making the optimization of the acquisition parameters difficult. Once the data has been acquired it may be processed and analysed in a number of different ways to extract the required information. 

A D-optimal experimental design was chosen in order to minimize covariance between preparation parameters for a preselected number of preparation parameters and number of catalysts [6]. The design was then modified to include 3x3 experimental points, which reflect the influence of one preparation parameter while the other parameters are kept constant. Hence, three curves were obtained for each preparation parameter with different combinations of the other parameters, where the combinations were selected to achieve design with the highest D-efficiency (calculations were done by Matlab software [7]). Set-point values for the ten selected experimental parameters are shown in Table 1. 90 catalysts out of 59049 were selected for the experimental study. 

Hydroxyethylation of furfuryl alcohol with aqueous acetaldehyde was performed at 318 K in the presence of FAU, MOR and MFI zeolites in their protonic form. Besides the hydroxyethylation reaction, two other parallel reactions may compete, i.e. oligomerisation of acetaldehyde and resinification of furfuryl alcohol. The former reaction is easily controlled over a MFI catalyst with a Si/Al ratio of 25 but the latter is not, and linear furanic polymers, capable of deactivating the catalyst, were often formed. A selectivity of about 55 % in the carbinol intermediate was initially achieved in the presence of the MFI (25) catalyst for a furfuryl alcohol conversion up to 65 %. However, after optimization of the kinetic parameters, the selectivity is increased to 95 %, but to the detriment of furfuryl alcohol conversion. 

Photobioreactor engineering addresses optimization of the volumetric rate of biomass production, the surface rate of biomass production (with respect to the solar-energy collecting surface), and thermodynamic efficiency of the process as well as biomass composition (ie, the biomass quality). Hereafter, we mainly focus on construction of a predictive model for the volumetric rate (eg, expressed in kg, or moles of dry biomass per second and per m of the reaction volume). This is the main difficulty with assessing performance of a photobioreactor because most of the other parameters of interest can be deduced only from the value of < >, in a... 

---