Optimization characteristics iteration

Because of the convenient mathematical characteristics of the x -value (it is additive), it is also used to monitor the fit of a model to experimental data in this application the fitted model Y - ABS(/(x,. ..)) replaces the expected probability increment ACP (see Eq. 1.7) and the measured value y, replaces the observed frequency. Comparisons are only carried out between successive iterations of the optimization routine (e.g. a simplex-program), so that critical X -values need not be used. For example, a mixed logarithmic/exponential function Y=Al LOG(A2 + EXP(X - A3)) is to be fitted to the data tabulated below do the proposed sets of coefficients improve the fit The conclusion is that the new coefficients are indeed better. The y-column shows the values actually measured, while the T-columns give the model estimates for the coefficients A1,A2, and A3. The x -columns are calculated as (y- Y) h- Y. The fact that the sums over these terms, 4.783,2.616, and 0.307 decrease for successive approximations means that the coefficient set 6.499... yields a better approximation than either the initial or the first proposed set. If the x sum, e.g., 0.307,... 

Selecting the optimal preprocessing may require some iteration benveen the primary analysis and the preprocessing step. Although this empirical approach is a common practice, it is best if the preprocessing tool is chosen because of a known characteristic of the data. For example, percent transmission spectra are often linearized with respect to concentration by converting them to absorbance units. 

If there is no or little information on the method s performance characteristics, it is recommended that the method s suitability for its intended use in initial experiments be proven. These studies should include the approximate precision, working range, and detection limits. If the preliminary validation data appear to be inappropriate, the method itself, the equipment, the analysis technique, or the acceptance limits should be changed. In this way method development and validation is an iterative process. For example, in liquid chromatography selectivity is achieved through selection of mobile-phase composition. For quantitative measurements the resolution factor between two peaks should be 2.5 or higher. If this value is not achieved, the mobile phase composition needs further optimization. 

An EA works with a set of candidate solutions to the optimization problem. A solution is referred to as an individual and a set of p solutions is called the population. Each individual has a fitness value which shows how good the solution is with respect to the objective function. X new individuals are added to the population by recombination and mutation of existing individuals. The idea is that the new individuals inherit good characteristics from the existing individuals. The X worst solutions are removed from the population. After several iterations, which are called generations, the algorithm provides a population that comprises good solutions. 

Section III then introduces the various approximate energy expressions that are used to determine the wavefunction corrections within each iteration of the MCSCF optimization procedure. Although many of these approximate energy expressions are defined in terms of the same set of intermediate quantities (i.e. the gradient vector and Hessian matrix elements), these expressions have some important formal differences. These formal differences result in MCSCF methods that have qualitatively different convergence characteristics. 

Much of the art of the sensor is in the synthesis of the desired material. Characteristics such as homogeneity, grain size, and crystalline phase, which can be controlled to varying degrees during the synthesis process, greatly influence the ultimate sensor mechanisms [52]. Iterative experimentation with metal oxide particle size, prefired compositions, catalysts, and process variables is necessary to optimize porosity, resistance, sensitivity, and other sensor characteristics. 

Linally, the derivations of the present chapter can be illustrated and summarized by a single formula written for the rather general case when the forward model is non-linear and a priori information on both magnitudes and smoothness of retrieved function y(x) is available. If y x) needs to be retrieved from observations of two different characteristics Zi( )=Zi( y(x)) and Z2( ) = Zj y(jr)) measured in a range of, ( can be angle, wavelength, etc.) then the optimized solution can be obtained by iterations ... 

---