Optical preparations

The single most important preparation instrument in the microscopy laboratory is the stereo binocular microscope. These instruments are inexpensive and readily available. Materials may be observed in either transmitted or reflected light, and the result often provides insights into the problem. Even rather large parts may be examined as part of the important first step in choosing the area of a sample to be analyzed. 

A direct method of preparing fluids is to use a cavity slide to permit a known fluid thickness to be examined optically. A crystal suspension may be examined in this way [1,2]. Solutions or solid materials may be placed in a cavity slide or onto a slide with a cover slip (under an inert or dry atmosphere, if needed). 

The single most important preparation instrument in the microscopy laboratory is the stereo 

A direct method of preparing fluids is to use a cavity slide to permit a known fluid thickness to be examined optically. A crystal suspension may 

---

The Rydberg state which is optically prepared in a typical ZEKE experiment is usually directly coupled to the continuum [45c, 57]. Other considerations being absent, it should decay promptly, possibly with a stable, trapped component. The point is that the initially prepared state is also directly coupled to many other states, due both to external perturbations [37] and to intramolecular coupling [3b]. The conclusion that the initial state has two components, one that decays promptly and one that is trapped, is thus only valid in zero order (so-called golden rule limit). One needs to allow for the coupling terms represented by V and U. 

Prompt and delayed ionization is familiar for very energy rich molecules. The special feature of high Rydberg states is the initial state that is optically prepared, a state directly coupled to the continuum on the one hand and to a very dense bound manifold on the other. The dynamical theory necessary to describe such states has been reviewed, with special reference to the extremely long-time decay. It is suggested that this resilience to decay is due... 

Photodissociation can be simplified into the three steps of optical preparation or excitation, evolution through the transition state, and production of final products, respectively. In the optical preparation stage... 

It is sufficient to determine the quantity Rxk in the second order with respect to the CC photon interaction. We further assume that the optical preparation of the excited state by the applied field E is short compared to the emission process and, finally, we neglect anti-resonant contributions. When calculating F(u> t) we also have to perform a summation with respect to the transversal polarization and a solid angle integration. Introducing dm = dmem where eTO is the unit vector pointing in the direction of the transition dipole moment one gets... 

In Section III.A.l we did not discuss the way the surface emission is excited. The radiative behavior of the surface shows that emission (normal to the surface) is observed as soon as the K = 0 state is prepared. This state may be prepared either by a short ( 0.2ps) resonant pulse, or by relaxation from higher, optically prepared excited states. It is obvious that the quantum yield of the surface emission will critically depend on the excitation, owing to intrasurface relaxation accelerated by various types of fission processes (see Fig. 2.8) and in competition with fast irreversible transfer to the bulk (3.30), which is also a surface relaxation, at least at very low temperatures. Thus, the surface excitation spectra provide key information both on the upper, optically accessible surface states and on the relaxation mechanisms to the emitting surface state K = 0. 

ISC from the optically prepared singlet state populates one or two low-lying A" triplet states in a few hundreds of femtoseconds, see Sect. 3. Triplet states are initially populated hot, that is nonequilibrated both in terms of the molecular structure and the medium. Relaxation processes, which occur on the timescale of picoseconds to nanoseconds (depending on the medium), will be discussed in Sect. 5. Herein, we will deal with thermally equilibrated (relaxed) lowest triplet states and their theoretical as well as experimental characterization. 

Phosphorescence of s-triazine has been observed by Ohta et al. following excitation of the 6o band of the Si — So transition. Values for the phosphorescence lifetime and quantum yield were reported. The effects of rotational excitation on the yields and decays of the fast and slow components of Si state s-triazine fluorescence have been studied. Excitation along the rotational contours of the 6j and 6o bands revealed that the fast component showed little rotational level dependence in contrast to the slow component. This behaviour was interpreted in terms of an increase in the number of triplet levels coupled to the optically prepared singlet levels with increasing angular momentum quantum number, J. A broad emission feature present in addition to narrowline fluorescence from rovibronic levels of 6 or 6 in S, s-triazine has been observed and the rotational level dependence of its quantum yield and decay over a range of pressures reported... 

Typical electron injection times are faster than, or comparable with, relaxation of the optically prepared Franck-Condon MLCT excited states. Hence, the electron injection can actually occur directly from the Franck-Condon state. This is the case of [Fe(4,4 -(COOH)2-bpy)2(CN)2] which reacts from its optically prepared MLCT state [304], before its deactivation through the lower-lying LF states can occur. The relaxation time of the MLCT state of the actual [Ru(4,4 -(COOH)2-bpy)2(NCS)2] sensitizer was determined as <75 fs [82], only a little slower than electron injection itself. Hence, it is possible that electron transfer occurs from both the optically prepared MLCT and relaxed MLCT states. 

The amplitudes of the different lines in the spectrum can be regarded as the components of the optically prepared bright state in the basis of the eigenstates of the system, cf. Eqs. (2)-(3). Already in Sec. II we had several occasions to note that the bright state behaves not unlike a random vector. One can therefore ask what the spectrum will be if we make the approximation that these components are truly random. This requires us to specify, in a technical sense, what we mean by random. This is where entropy comes in. By random we will mean that the distribution of the amplitudes be as uniform as possible and, as such, be a distribution of maximal entropy. 

L.P. Asatiani, N.G. Lekishvili, G.M. Rubinstein and W.S. Chagulov, Functional Classification of Optically Prepared Polymeric Materials, Tbilisi University Publishers, Tbilisi, Georgia, 1990, [In Russian]. 

---