Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

On hard disk surface

The concept of overcoating PFPE onto SAMs is similar to that of magnetic harddisk lubrication, where a combination of both bonded and mobile PFPEs is routinely used to better protect the hard-disk surface. For example, in the studies by Katano et al. [48], Chen et al. [49], and Sinha et al. [50], a combination of both bonded and mobile PFPEs on hard-disk surfaces has shown higher wear durability than the use of either bonded or mobile PFPEs alone. In a study by Choi et al. [51], PFPE overcoating onto SAMs-modifled hydrogenated amorphous carbon surface has shown higher wear durability than only a SAM-coated or PFPE-coated carbon surface. [Pg.114]

This chapter introduces three kinds of surface organic modihcation hlms on a magnetic head that we have studied. These are polyfluoroalkylmethacrylate films, X-1P films, and self-assembled monolayers (SAMs). It also reviews the works of surface lube on a hard disk surface. In the last, the challenges on the development of a magnetic recording system are discussed. [Pg.211]

Barcol Indenter. The Barcol hardness tester is a hand-held, spring-loaded instmment with a steel indenter developed for use on hard plastics and soft metals (ASTM D2583) (2). In use the indenter is forced into the sample surface and a hardness number is read direcdy off the integral dial indicator caUbrated on a 0 to 100 scale. Barcol hardness numbers do not relate to nor can they be converted to other hardness scales. The Barcol instmment is caUbrated at each use by indenting an aluminum ahoy standard disk suppHed with it. The Barcol test is relatively insensitive to surface condition but may be affected by test sample size and thickness. [Pg.467]

Partially fluorinated X-IP has been used for a number of years as an additive in the inert lubricant PFPE film on the surface of a magnetic hard disk to enhance start/stop durability of PFPE lubricants [29,30]. Recently it has been used as a vapor lubricated film on the surface of the disks [31 ]. In order to avoid the PFPE being catalyzed to decomposition by the slider material AI2O3 (refer to Section 3.4), XI -P was also examined as a protective film on the surface of the magnetic heads [25,32]. The results of CSS tests indicate that the thermal stability of the lubricant was greatly improved in the presence of X-1P, and the thickness of X-1P film on the slider surface has an important influence on HDD lubrication properties. [Pg.214]

Long ago, Langmuir suggested that the rate of deposition of particles on a surface is proportional to the density of particles in the vicinity of the surface and to the available area on the surface [1], However, the calculation of the available area is still an open problem. In a first approximation, one can assume that the available area is the total area of the surface minus the area already occupied by the adsorbed particles [1]. A better approximation can be obtained if the adsorbed particles, assumed to have the shape of a disk, are in thermal equilibrium on the surface, either because of surface diffusion and/or of adsorption/desorption kinetics. In this case, one can use one of the empirical equations available for the compressibility of a 2D gas of hard disks, calculate the chemical potential in excess to that of an ideal gas [2] and then use the Widom relation between the area available to one particle and its excess chemical potential on the surface (the particle insertion method) [3], The method is accurate at low densities of adsorbed particles, where the equations of state are accurate, but, in general, poor at high concentrations. The equations of state for hard disks are based on the virial expansion and only the first few coefficients of this... [Pg.690]

Widom [9] realized the importance of this problem for statistical mechanics and showed that the centers of the particles of a hard disk gas, in an equilibrium position, are not uniformly random distributed. The available area for a nevt particle power series in particle density 6 = Nnr2/A, where N is the number of adsorbed panicles, r their radius and A the total area of the surface. The coefficients of the series terms are identical up to the second power of 9 for the equilibrium and the RSA models. The differences in the higher powers coefficients lead for RSA to jamming for Op = 0.76, 0.547 and 0.38 for the ID (segments on a line), 2D (disks on a surface) and 3D (spheres on a volume), respectively, while for the equilibrium configurations the close-packing occurs at 9 = 1, 0.91 and 0.74, respectively. [Pg.691]

The only approximate analytical solution for the RSA of a binary mixture of hard disks was proposed by Talbot and Schaaf [27], Their theory is exact in the limit of vanishing small disks radius rs — 0, but fails when the ratio y = r Jrs of the two kinds of disk radii is less than 3.3 its accuracy for intermediate values is not known. Later, Talbot et al. [28] observed that an approximate expression for the available area derived from the equilibrium Scaled Panicle Theory (SPT) [19] provided a reasonable approximation for the available area for a non-equilibrium RSA model, up to the vicinity of the jamming coverage. While this expression can be used to calculate accurately the initial kinetics of adsorption, it invariably predicts that the abundant particles will be adsorbed on the surface until 6=1, because the Scaled Particle Theory cannot predict jamming. [Pg.692]

C. Encoding converts binary information into patterns of magnetic flux on a hard disk s surface. This is how the data is written to the surface. [Pg.191]

The first method, wettability, can be evaluated from the contact angle of a drop of liquid deposited on the flat surface of the solid. This method hardly applies to powders like silicas because special care must be taken to control the surface porosity of a silica disk made from compressed silica particles. For a chromatographic silica, Kessaissia et al. (1) determined a Ys value close to 100 mJ/m2 whereas the polar component of the surface energy was found to be 46 mJ/m. Hence, the silica exhibits a large surface energy. [Pg.249]


See other pages where On hard disk surface is mentioned: [Pg.226]    [Pg.695]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.695]    [Pg.814]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.1]    [Pg.511]    [Pg.899]    [Pg.355]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.393]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.210]    [Pg.210]    [Pg.210]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.541]    [Pg.262]    [Pg.263]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.355]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.387]    [Pg.625]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.355]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.834]    [Pg.836]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.226 , Pg.227 , Pg.228 , Pg.229 , Pg.230 ]




SEARCH



Hard disks

Hard surfacing

Surface hardness

© 2024 chempedia.info