Of upper excited states

D. Lynch, J. F. Endicott. A Pulsed Photoacoustic Microcalorimeter for the Detection of Upper Excited-State Processes and Intersystem Crossing Yields. Appl. Spectroscopy 1989, 43, 826-833. 

To review all of the previously reported upper excited state photophysics and photochemistry as well as processes reported for excited reaction intermediates would require substantially more than a single chapter in this volume. For this reason, I have limited the scope of the chapter to include only the chemistry and photophysics of upper excited states and the chemistry and photophysics of excited radicals of organic systems. 

The recent development of the two-color and laser jet techniques has facilitated the exploration of the chemistry and photophysics of upper excited state and excited reaction intermediates, including neutral radicals. Upper states and excited radicals participate in many of the same reactions as lower states (but often with different efficiency) as well as in many reactions that are not accessible to lower states because of energy considerations. The use of two-color and laser jet techniques in several recent studies is a powerful combination that is just now beginning to be utilized in the study of multiphoton transients. 

The involvement of upper excited states following irradiation of the phthalocyanine complexes Rh(Pc)(MeOH)X (where X = Cl, Br, or I) has been investigated. All compounds have the same action spectrum for photoinduced H-abstraction and the emission at 420 nm is attributed to relaxation of an upper tt, tt ) excited state. At high photonic fluxes it has been shown that biphotonic photochemistry involves the n, tt state. A study of the photoaquation of [RhCNH,), ] in fully and partially hydrated zeolite Y has been reported. Reaction within the cavities occurs with a quantum yield that is only 15—20% of that in aqueous solution this is attributed to the decrease in mobility of the water in the zeolite and to the exclusion of water from the ligand-exchange site by the zeolite lattice. ... 

It has been suggested (79) that slow interconversion of relatively isolated states of different orbital nature (IL, LF, CT) may occur due to the different degrees to which these states are affected by spin-orbit coupling. Relatively small rate constants ( 10 s ) for interconversion between ligand localized ( IL) and metal localized ( LF) excited states have in fact been measured in a few cases (78). In other studies, however, the observed wavelength effects have been attributed to very fast reactions of upper excited states (49,76,77). Thus either factor (slow internal conversion or fast reaction rate) or a combination thereof may produce wavelength effects. 

This volume contains seven chapters written by international experts on the photochemishy and photophysics of organic, inorganic, and biological molecules. The first chapter by Steer and coworkers summarizes the current status of upper excited state physics of organic and inorganic molecules. Almost five decades ago it was believed that no measurable processes are likely from S, S3, T, and Tj states however, Chapter 1 makes it evident that this belief is no longer valid. 

Figure 14. The absolute value of the average disrotatory angle as a function of time in femtoseconds. (The disrotatory angle is defined in the upper left inset.) Lower inset A onedimensional cut of the excited-state potential energy surface along the disrotatory and conrotatory coordinates. All other coordinates are kept at their ground-state equilibrium value, and the full and dashed lines correspond to two levels of electronic structure theory (see text for details). (Figure adapted from Ref. 216.)...

The first excited state of cyclobutene (o27t ) is correlated with the upper excited state ( /J /2 /3) of butadiene making it a high energy symmetry forbidden process. 

Similarly the first excited state of butadiene V1V2V3 is correlated with a high energy upper excited state G27tc of cyclobutene. Thus a photochemical conrotatory process in either direction would be a symmetry forbidden reaction. 

The much larger energy difference between Si and S0 than between any successive excited states means that, generally speaking, internal conversion between Si and S0 occurs more slowly than that between excited states. Therefore, irrespective of which upper excited state is initially produced by photon absorption, rapid internal conversion and vibrational relaxation processes mean that the excited-state molecule quickly relaxes to the Si(v0) state from which fluorescence and intersystem crossing compete effectively with internal conversion from Si. This is the basis of Kasha s rule, which states that because of the very rapid rate of deactivation to the lowest vibrational level of Si (or Td, luminescence emission and chemical reaction by excited molecules will always originate from the lowest vibrational level of Si or T ... 

The rate of internal conversion between electronic states is determined by the magnitude of the energy gap between these states. The energy gaps between upper excited states (S4, S3, S2) are relatively small compared to the gap between the lowest excited state and the ground state, and so the internal conversion between them will be rapid. Thus fluorescence is unable to compete with internal conversion from upper excited states. The electronic energy gap between Si and S0 is much larger and so fluorescence (Si —> S0) is able to compete with Si(v = 0) So(v = n) internal conversion. 

Sorokin and Lankard illuminated cesium and rubidium vapors with light pulses from a dye laser pumped by a ruby giant-pulse laser, and obtained two-step excitation of Csj and Rbj molecules (which are always present in about 1 % concentration at atomic vapor pressures of 10" - 1 torr) jhe upper excited state is a repulsive one and dissociates into one excited atom and one ground-state atom. The resulting population inversion in the Ip level of Cs and the 6p level of Rb enables laser imission at 3.095 jum in helium-buffered cesium vapor and at 2.254 pm and 2.293 /zm in rubidium vapor. Measurements of line shape and frequency shift of the atomic... 

In this paper, we will present our recent observations on the upper excited-state emission of a variety of metalloporphyrins. 

The existence of this TTA bimolecular process makes it possible to carry out cooperative excitation of energy rich molecular states by low energy quanta. In particular, formation of upper excited singlet states as a result of TTA has been observed for several aromatic hydrocarbons (1) and metalloporphyrins ( ) by the demonstration of annihiTation-induced delayed fluorescence (AOF) from upper singlet states. 

As we have seen above (Section IV.C), in the polynuclear complexes dealt with in this review it is possible to identify components which can undergo photoexcitation independently from one another. The excited component can then give rise to intercomponent energy transfer processes, in competition with intracomponent decay. For most of the components which constitute the examined systems, the lifetime of the lowest excited state is long enough to allow the occurrence of energy transfer to nearby components when suitable energetic and electronic conditions are satisfied. This is not usually the case for upper excited states, which usually decay very rapidly (picosecond time scale) to the lowest excited state within each component. 

Bimolecular Reactions from Upper Triplet States. Other cases of sensitization by second excited triplet states have not yet come to light however, several bimolecular reactions of this sort have been reported. Since an upper excited state that lives long enough to undergo a bimolecular reaction should also be capable of transferring energy, these reactions will be discussed briefly. 

By using high intensity flash lamps and laser sources, photophysical and photochemical properties of the triplet states can be studied. These sources also help to study emission from upper excited state. 

The analysis of the transient fluorescence spectra of polar molecules in polar solvents that was outlined in Section I.A assumes that the specific probe molecule has certain ideal properties. The probe should not be strongly polarizable. Probe/solvent interactions involving specific effects, such as hydrogen-bonding should be avoided because specific solute/solvent effects may lead to photophysically discrete probe/solvent complexes. Discrete probe/solvent interactions are inconsistent with the continuum picture inherent in the theoretical formalism. Probes should not possess low lying, upper excited states which could interact with the first-excited state during the solvation processes. In addition, the probe should not possess more than one thermally accessible isomer of the excited state. 

---