O-Methylstyrene

A number of examples have been studied in recent years, including liquid sulfur [1-3,8] and selenium [4], poly(o -methylstyrene) [5-7], polymer-like micelles [9,11], and protein filaments [12]. Besides their importance for applications, EP pose a number of basic questions concerning phase transformations, conformational and relaxational properties, dynamics, etc. which distinguish them from conventional dead polymers in which the reaction of polymerization has been terminated. EP motivate intensive research activity in this field at present. 

TABLE 3.1.1.38.1 Reported vapor pressures of o-methylstyrene at various temperatures Clements et al. 1953 ... 

FIGURE 3.1.1.38.1 Logarithm of vapor pressure versus reciprocal temperature for o-methylstyrene. 

Table IV lists the planarization of 20 - 400 [im wide holes achieved by unbaked and baked films of positive photoresist, ortho-cresol novolac and poly(o>-methylstyrene).

The leveling rate can be increased by increasing the film thickness (10,12). Table V shows the degree of leveling achieved by ortho-cresol novolac and poly(o -methylstyrene) when the final film thickness after baking was about 4 fim. The films were baked at 225 C for 10 min. 

In the crystal state most stereoregular polymers have helical conformations. Group s(M/N) 1 comprises all the isotactic vinyl polymers [polypropylene, polybutene, polystyrene, etc., M/N = 3/1 poly-o-methylstyrene, etc., 4/1 ... 

Each set of experiments was carried out under the same reaction condition except using different comonomers, i.e. p-methylstyrene, o-methylstyrene, m-methylstyrene and styrene, respectively. The compositions of copolymers were determined by H NMR spectra, and the thermal properties (melting point and crystallinity) were obtained by DSC measurements. Overall, all comonomers show no retardation to the catalyst activity. In fact, the significantly higher catalyst activities were observed in all copolymerization reactions (runs 2-5), comparing with that of ethylene homopolymerization (run 1). Within each set (runs 2-5 and 6-9) of comparative experiments, p-methylstyrene consistently shows better incorporation than the rest of comonomers, i.e. o-methylstyrene, m-methylstyrene and styrene. Both catalysts with constrained mono- and di-cyclopentadienyl ligands are very effective to incorporate p-methylstyrene into polyethylene backbone. In runs 2 and 6, more than 80 % of p-methylstyrene were converted to copolymer within one hour under constant (- 45 psi) ethylene pressure. On the other hand, only less than half of styrenes (runs 5 and 9) were incorporated into ethylene copolymers under the same reaction conditions. The significantly... 

---