Nucleophile-substrate interaction substitution

The effects of the nucleophile on aromatic substitution which are pertinent to our main theme of relative reactivity of azine rings and of ring-positions are brought together here. The influence of a nucleophile on relative positional reactivity can arise from its characteristics alone or from its interaction with the ring or with ring-substituents. The effect of different nucleophiles on the rates of reaction of a single substrate has been discussed in terms of polarizability, basicity, alpha effect (lone-pair on the atom adjacent to the nucleophilic atom), and solvation in several reviews and papers. ... 

Table IV compares the reactivity ratios of a soft (PhS-) to a hard (MeO-) nucleophile in vinylic substitution. PhS is always more reactive, and ratios lower than unity, as for 4, X = Br (4), are certainly due to elimination-addition with MeO . The ratios change by >2000-fold and are sensitive to the geometry of the substrate. An important feature is that for (3-halo-p-nitrostyrenes the ratio decreases strongly with the increased hardness of the (3-halogen (38). The lowest ratios are for the (3-fluoro derivative, whereas the differences between the chloro and bromo compounds are not so large. This behavior is similar to that in SNAr reactions. This behavior can be rationalized by symbiotic effects, which favor the soft-soft PhS--Br interaction and the hard-hard MeO-F interaction. A reactivity-selectivity relationship for vinyl bromides of different electrophilicities does not exist.

Weak nucleophile-electrophile interactions (and the donor-acceptor complexes) are considered precursors in aromatic electrophilic substitutions and in additions of electrophiles to C=C double bond of olefins the first step (the addition of the electrophile to an electron-rich substrate) is probably the same for both reactions. 

Rate constants of bimolecular, micelle-assisted, reactions typically go through maxima with increasing concentration of inert surfactant (Section 3). But a second rate maximum is observed in very dilute cationic surfactant for aromatic nucleophilic substitution on hydrophobic substrates. This maximum seems to be related to interactions between planar aromatic molecules and monomeric surfactant or submicellar aggregates. These second maxima are not observed with nonplanar substrates, even such hydrophobic compounds as p-nitrophenyl diphenyl phosphate (Bacaloglu, R. 1986, unpublished results). 

In the literature, there are numerous reports regarding the interactions between amines and both electron and proton acceptors132, but less attention has been devoted to interactions between amines and aromatic electron acceptors, in particular when the substrate/amine system is a reacting system, as in the case of nucleophilic aromatic substitution (SjvAr) reactions between amines and substrates activated by nitro or by other electron-withdrawing groups. 

A new assumption to be discussed in this section is that the fourth-order kinetics in SatAr by amines in aprotic solvents is due to the formation of the substrate-catalyst molecular complex. Since 1982, Forlani and coworkers149 have advocated a model in which the third order in amine is an effect of the substrate-nucleophile interaction on a rapidly established equilibrium preceding the substitution process, as is shown in Scheme 15 for the reaction of 4-fluoro-2,4-dinitrobenzene (FDNB) with aniline (An), where K measures the equilibrium constant for ... 

Spin traps can act as one-electron oxidizers. This property is even more pronounced in the interactions of traps with anion-radicals. Traps can block the ion-radical pathway. In other words, they inhibit the whole reaction, including the ion-radical step. This can be explained by both the oxidation of substrate anion-radical and chain termination due to oxidation of product anion-radical. An illustrative example is the inhibition of nucleophilic substitution of 2-chloroquinoxaline by the radical trap bis(tcrt-butyl)nitrone (Carver et al. 1982). 

The presence of a stereogenic center on the aldehyde can strongly inlinence the diastereoselectivity in allylboration reactions, especially if this center is in the a-position. Predictive rules for nucleophilic addition on snch a-snbstitnted carbonyl substrates such as the Felkin model are not always snitable for closed transition structures.For a-substituted aldehydes devoid of a polar substituent, Roush has established that the minimization of ganche-ganche ( syn-pentane ) interactions can overrule the influence of stereoelectronic effects. This model is valid for any 3-monosubstituted allylic boron reagent. For example, althongh crotylboronate (E)-7 adds to aldehyde 39 to afford as the major prodnct the diastereomer predicted by the Felkin model (Scheme 2), " it is proposed that the dominant factor is rather the minimization of syn-pentane interactions between the Y-snbstitnents of the allyl unit and the a-carbon of the aldehyde. With this... 

Reactions of substituted a-ketoalkynes (RC=CCOR ) with 6-amino-l,3-dimethyluracil and a water-soluble nickel catalytic system [Ni(CN)2-CO-KCN-NaOH] afforded 2,4-dioxopyrido[2,3- pyrimidine derivatives 532 under very mild conditions (room temperature and atmospheric pressure). The mechanism involved a nucleophilic attack by Ni(0), formed in situ, onto the triple bond of the substrate. The reaction terminates within 30 min, giving 98% of 532, while in the absence of this catalytic system the reaction took a longer time (lOh) to reach a maximum yield of 30% <2001J(P1)2341>. A regioselective interaction of 6-aminouracil derivatives with GF3COCH2COR in boiling AcOH afforded the cyclized 5-trifluoromethylpyrido[2,3-, pyrimidines 533 <200381531 >. 

There is an ongoing controversy about whether there is any stabilization of the transition state for nucleophilic substitution at tertiary aliphatic carbon from interaction with nucleophilic solvent." ° This controversy has developed with the increasing sophistication of experiments to characterize solvent effects on the rate constants for solvolysis reactions. Grunwald and Winstein determined rate constants for solvolysis of tert-butyl chloride in a wide variety of solvents and used these data to define the solvent ionizing parameter T (Eq. 3). They next found that rate constants for solvolysis of primary and secondary aliphatic carbon show a smaller sensitivity (m) to changes in Y than those for the parent solvolysis reaction of tert-butyl chloride (for which m = 1 by definition). A second term was added ( N) to account for the effect of changes in solvent nucleophilicity on obsd that result from transition state stabilization by a nucleophilic interaction between solvent and substrate. It was first assumed that there is no significant stabilization of the transition state for solvolysis of tert-butyl chloride from such a nucleophilic interaction. However, a close examination of extensive rate data revealed, in some cases, a correlation between rate constants for solvolysis of fert-butyl derivatives and solvent nucleophicity. " ... 

The use of molten salts as nucleophile sources has been shown to have a profound effect (rates independent of the anion and badly dependent of substrate, transition state resembling SN2) on aromatic substitution reactions, which has been attributed to the interaction of the solvent and the molten salt908 (reaction 272). 

---