Nuclear magnetic resonance time scale

Some preliminary laboratory work is in order, if the information is not otherwise known. First, we ask what the time scale of the reaction is surely our approach will be different if the reaction reaches completion in 10 ms, 10 s, 10 min, or 10 h. Then, one must consider what quantitative analytical techniques can be used to monitor it progress. Sometimes individual samples, either withdrawn aliquots or individual ampoules, are taken. More often a nondestructive analysis is performed, the progress of the reaction being monitored continuously or intermittently by a technique such as ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometry or nuclear magnetic resonance. The fact that both reactants and products might contribute to the instrument reading will not prove to be a problem, as explained in the next chapter. 

The binding of calcium ion to calmodulin, a major biochemical regulator of ion pumps and receptors, occurs on a time scale about a thousand times shorter than that observed for RNA conformational change. This Ca2+-calmodulin binding, which can be followed successfully by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), occurs in about ten milliseconds. 

Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy is a most effective and significant method for observing the structure and dynamics of polymer chains both in solution and in the solid state [1]. Undoubtedly the widest application of NMR spectroscopy is in the field of structure determination. The identification of certain atoms or groups in a molecule as well as their position relative to each other can be obtained by one-, two-, and three-dimensional NMR. Of importance to polymerization of vinyl monomers is the orientation of each vinyl monomer unit to the growing chain tacticity. The time scale involved in NMR measurements makes it possible to study certain rate processes, including chemical reaction rates. Other applications are isomerism, internal relaxation, conformational analysis, and tautomerism. 

Table 1.1 lists minimum lifetimes for observation of separate species and the appropriate spectroscopic methods. The time scale of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) experiments is particularly long, and many conformational isomers and some constitutional isomers (see below) interconvert rapidly within the time of observation and appear to be more symmetric than simple bonding considerations would imply. We will expand on these ideas after the next two sections. 

From a medicinal chemist s perspective, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) was still the analytical tool of choice, whereas mass spectrometry, infrared (IR), and elemental analyses completed the necessary ensemble of analytical structure confirmation. Synthesis routines were capable of generating several milligrams of product, which is more than adequate for proton and carbon NMR experiments. For analyses that involved natural products, metabolites, or synthetic impurities, time-consuming and often painstaking isolation methods were necessary, followed by expensive scale-up procedures, to obtain the necessary amount of material for an NMR experiment. In situations that involved trace-mixture analysis, radiolabeling approaches were often used in conjunction with various formats of chromatographic separation. 

An important issue associated with molecular machines is the detection of actuations on the nanoscale level. When a chemical stimulus induces movement in a machine, several spectroscopic techniques, such as nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, UV-Vis spectroscopy, emission spectroscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) can be used to detect their outputs. More intri-guingly, electrochemical and photochemical inputs often provide [6, 8g] a two-fold advantage by inducing the mechanical movements and detecting them. Additionally, the dual actions of the these two types of stimuli can be exploited when the time-scale of the molecular actuations, which ranges from picoseconds to seconds, falls within the detection time-scale of the apparatus. 

For the investigation of the molecular dynamics in polymers, deuteron solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (2D-NMR) spectroscopy has been shown to be a powerful method [1]. In the field of viscoelastic polymers, segmental dynamics of poly(urethanes) has been studied intensively by 2D-NMR [78, 79]. In addition to ID NMR spectroscopy, 2D NMR exchange spectroscopy was used to extend the time scale of molecular dynamics up to the order of milliseconds or even seconds. In combination with line-shape simulation, this technique allows one to obtain correlation times and correlation-time distributions of the molecular mobility as well as detailed information about the geometry of the motional process [1]. 

Certain spectroscopic techniques, such as nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) methods, require that the membrane mimetic, i.e., the lipid aggregate is not too large, and that the lipids exhibit a high degree of motion. For such studies, the micellar membrane model is often preferred. Micelles are relatively small (Fig. 3, top), which means that they rotate rapidly, on the time-scale required for NMR. These micelles consist of detergent molecules that aggregate above the critical micelle concentration (CMC). The size of a micelle is defined by the... 

Although the determination of HA or HB selectivity is relatively straightforward the techniques for isolation of pyridine nucleotides from the reaction mixtures are tedious and time consuming. Two more recent techniques use either proton magnetic resonance or electron impact and field desorption mass spectrometry. The technique of Kaplan and colleagues requires a 220 MHz nuclear magnetic resonance spectrometer interfaced with a Fourier transform system [104], It allows the elimination of extensive purification of the pyridine nucleotide, is able to monitor the precise oxidoreduction site at position 4, can be used with crude extracts, and can be scaled down to /nmole quantities of coenzyme. The method can distinguish between [4-2H]NAD+ (no resonance at 8.95 8) and NAD+ (resonance at 8.95—which is preferred) or between [4A-2H]NADH (resonance at 2.67 8, 75 4B = 3.8 Hz) and [4B-2H]NADH (resonance at 2.77 8, J5 4A = 3.1 Hz). 

---