Normal equivalent deviates

NED normal equivalent deviate, negative staining A technique used in electron microscopy in which a specimen is surrounded by a heavy metal stain. The result is to outline the shape of the specimen and penetrate its surface clefts to produce a negative impression. ... 

The well-known SD unit or normal equivalent deviate is such a measure. It is calculated as the difference between the observed value and the mean of the reference values divided by their standard deviation. Several similar ratios have been suggested/ but none has significant advantages over the other. All produce very confusing values if the reference distribution is very skewed. An observed value (e.g., with an SD unit of 2.2) would be above the 97,5 percentile if the reference distribution has a Gaussian shape, but might be well below the upper reference limit of a positively skewed distribution. Mathematical transformation of the reference distribution to the Gaussian shape may solve this problem. ... 

In addition to expressing the dose as a function of the median and standard deviations, it is also possible to express the response in the same way. For this purpose the concept of the normal equivalent deviation (NED) i.e., the number of standard deviations on either side of the median response, has been devised and can be used as a means of expressing the response. To avoid the use of positive and negative numbers, and recognizing that it is likely that data will not frequently be collected which lies more than a few standard deviations from the mean, a convention has been adopted called the probit. The number 5 is added to the NED to yield positive numbers and indicates the number of standard deviations from the mean that the response is found. Table I shows the relationship between percentage response, NED and the probit value. 

LOQ) will typically be higher than the instrumental detection limit (IDL), because of background analyte and matrix-based interferences. The BEC (blank equivalent concentration) used in Table 4.7 is the apparent concentration of an analyte normally derived from intercepted point of its calibration curve or by reference of the actual counts for that analyte in a blank solution. The BEC gives a good indication of the blank level, which will affect the IDL. Most often, the detection limits are calculated as three times the normal standard deviation of the BEC in a within batch replicate analytical measurement of a blank solution. Therefore, if the instrument is stable enough, this will give a better IDL than the BEC itself. The BEC is a combination of the contamination of the analyte in the solution, the residual amount of the analyte in the spectrometer and the contribution of any polyatomic species in the analyte mass. 

Drops for oral use have to meet the requirement that the separate masses of 10 miits equivalent to the normal dose deviate maximally 10 % from the average mass. The total of 10 masses does not differ by more than 15 % from the nominal mass of 10 doses. 

Table 20.5.2 also can be used to determine probabilities concerning normal random variables tliat are not standard normal variables. The required probability is first converted to tm equivalent probability about a standard normal variable. For example if T, the time to failure, is normally distributed with mean p = 100 and stanchird deviation a = 2 tlien (T - 100)/2 is a standard normal variable and... 

If a result is quoted as having an uncertainty of 1 standard deviation, an equivalent statement would be the 68.3% confidence limits are given by Xmean 1 Sjc, the reason being that the area under a normal distribution curve between z = -1.0 to z = 1.0 is 0.683. Now, confidence limits on the 68% level are not very useful for decision making because in one-third of all... 

Use Inverse of above function given a cumulative probability CP, the equivalent normalized deviate z is calculated. 

Essentially this is equivalent to using (Sf/dk kj instead of (<3f/<3k,) for the sensitivity coefficients. By this transformation the sensitivity coefficients are normalized with respect to the parameters and hence, the covariance matrix calculated using Equation 12.4 yields the standard deviation of each parameter as a percentage of its current value. 

The main difference between the Z-test and the /-test is that the Z-statistic is based on a known standard deviation, a, while the /-statistic uses the sample standard deviation, s, as an estimate of a. With the assumption of normally distributed data, the variance sample variance, v2 as n gets large. It can be shown that the /-test is equivalent to the Z-test for infinite degrees-of-freedom. In practice, a large sample is usually considered n > 30. 

Figure 3. Variation of the "Ca/ Ca value in minerals of the 1 billion year old Pikes Peak grarrite as measured by Marshall and DePaolo (1982). The currently accepted age is 1.08 Ga (Scharer and Allegre 1982 Smith et al. 1999). The left side scale shows the values as deviations from the mantle Ca/ Ca in units of Eq, which is the parameter used to describe the radiogerric enrichments. The right side scale shows the equivalent value of 6 Ca that would be inferred for a sample with radiogenic errrichment of Ca, but analyzed according to the normal procedures for measuring mass dependent fractionation withoirt correction for the radiogenic component. Whole rock Ca enrichments typically are not greater than a few tenths of a unit of 6 Ca, but mineral Ca enrichments can be quite large.

Now, everything falls into place We set out to study the laws of random walk by using the simple model of Fig. 18 and found the Bernoulli coefficients. We then saw that for large n (which is equivalent to large times), the Bernoulli coefficients can be approximated by a normal distribution whose standard deviation, a, grows in proportion to the square root of time, tm (Eq. 18-3). And now it turns out that the solution of the Fick s second law for unbounded diffusion is also a normal distribution. In fact, the analogy between Eqs. 18-3b and 18-17 gave the basis for the law by Einstein and Smoluchowski (Eq. 18-17) that we used earlier (Eq. 18-8). The expression (2Dt)U2 will also show up in other solutions of the diffusion equation. 

A few values of the t-distribution are given in an accompanying table. We note that t values are considerably higher than corresponding standard normal values for small sample size but as n increases, the t-distribution asymptotically approaches the standard normal distribution. Even at a sample size as small as 30, the deviation from normality is small, so that it is possible to use the standard normal distribution for sample sizes larger than 30 (n>30) and in most cases, for n<30 t-distribution is used. This is equivalent to assuming that Sx is an exact estimate of ox at large sample sizes (n>30). 

Here, Joi and parameters defining the log-normal distribution. Joi is the median diameter, and cumulative-distribution curve has the value of 0.841 to the median diameter. In Joi and arithmetic mean and the standard deviation of In d, respectively, for the log-normal distribution (Problem 1.3). Note that, for the log-normal distribution, the particle number fraction in a size range of b to b + db is expressed by /N(b) db alternatively, the particle number fraction in a parametric range of Info to Info + d(lnb) is expressed by /N(lnb)d(lnb). 

---