Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Nontrivial weights

The Zemach correction is essentially a nontrivial weighted integral of the product of electric and magnetic densities, normalized to unity. It cannot be measured directly, like the rms proton charge radius which determines the main proton size correction to the Lamb shift (compare the case of the proton size correction to the Lamb shift of order Za) in (6.13) which depends on the third Zemach moment). This means that the correction in (11.4) may only conditionally be called the proton size contribution. [Pg.220]

Now, to be sure, McCulloch-Pitts neurons are unrealistically rendered versions of the real thing. For example, the assumption that neuronal firing occurs synchronously throughout the net at well defined discrete points in time is simply wrong. The tacit assumption that the structure of a neural net (i.e. its connectivity, as defined by the set of synaptic weights) remains constant over time is known be false as well. Moreover, while the input-output relationship for real neurons is nonlinear, real neurons are not the simple threshold devices the McCulloch-Pitts model assumes them to be. In fact, the output of a real neuron depends on its weighted input in a nonlinear but continuous manner. Despite their conceptual drawbacks, however, McCulloch-Pitts neurons are nontrivial devices. McCulloch-Pitts were able to show that for a suitably chosen set of synaptic weights wij, a synchronous net of their model neurons is capable of universal computation. This means that, in principle, McCulloch-Pitts nets possess the same raw computational power as a conventional computer (see section 6.4). [Pg.511]

Proof. Let w denote a weight vector of weight n. Let W denote the smallest invariant subspace containing w. Since w 0 by the definition of a weight vector, we have W 7 0. Let W be a nontrivial irreducible invariant subspace of W and note that w = 7 0, because otherwise W- - would contain w... [Pg.205]

Proof. The main idea is to define an isomorphism by mapping the eigenvectors of pli) to the monomials in P". Choose any highest weight vector vo for the representation p. Because V is in irreducible representation of sm(2), the nontrivial subrepresentation VL constructed in Proposition 8.8 must be all of V. Hence we have an explicit basis for V, namely,... [Pg.253]

To be distinguished from previous case, Table 3 shows that the HOMO-LUMO pair exerts visible predominance among the many other small orbital promotions. Correspondingly, the vibronic orbitals are similar to the frontier orbitals (Fig. 3). A nontrivial conclusion drawn from the weight of contributions in terms of vibronic... [Pg.378]

The multicanonical algorithms are powerful, but the probability weight factors are not a priori known and have to be determined by iterations of short trial simulations. This process can be nontrivial and very tedius for complex systems with many degreees of freedom. [Pg.62]

That the widths are nonzero at all means that uncertainty will precede measurements endeavored by the chemist. As in Figure 3.10, a thermodynamic measurement attaches to Shannon information in a nontrivial way. Figure 3.12 then shows the contrasts in the Figure 3.11 examples. If the chemist queries the left-side pressure at a resolution of 50kgTIV i, there are 20 or so states that will manifest frequently, and which he or she can discriminate. The plot shows the sum of weighted surprisals as a function of state index i—the lower p values correspond to lower i. There is about 30% more information, approximately 3.8 bits, trapped via a system 1 measurement compared with system 2. Clearly, when an equation of state is used to anticipate a quantity such as pressure, there are more issues at play than a correction term to add or subtract. To be precise, an equation of state furnishes an estimate of an average of a physical quantity subject to fluctuations. [Pg.81]

The next important question now is how to calculate all observables of the previous section from the tube coordinates Vj(t). In the slithering snake model, we will not distinguish the chain from the tube and assume that N = Z and Ri = Vj. This means that R can be thought of as the centers of the blobs of size Ne = N/Z, and one understands that the results of such a model are not valid at timescales treptation motion is associated with the center-of-mass motion of the chain inside the tube, it is reasonable to assume that the jump time t scales linearly with the molecular weight, that is, t=Ztss. Thus, the parameters of the model areZ, a, and z s- Since the last two parameters are just imits of space and time (similar to b and zq in the Rouse model), Z is the only nontrivial parameter (analogous to N in the Rouse model). [Pg.156]


See other pages where Nontrivial weights is mentioned: [Pg.116]    [Pg.758]    [Pg.350]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.758]    [Pg.350]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.471]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.380]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.368]    [Pg.720]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.434]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.332]    [Pg.333]    [Pg.462]    [Pg.470]    [Pg.471]    [Pg.434]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.380]    [Pg.457]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.758 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info