Nonlinear introducing constraints, useful

The formulation of the engineered nonlinear short-term model presented is a variant of an MINLP model described in the dissertation by Schulz [5], In this subsection, all necessary indices, parameters and variables are introduced, and the constraints and the objective function are derived. In the following section, the nonlinear formulation is linearized yielding a MILP model. In order to keep track of the variables used in the MINLP and in the MILP formulation, they are displayed in Figure 7.3 along with some key parameters. 

Early applications of MPC took place in the 1970s, mainly in industrial contexts, but only later MPC became a research topic. One of the first solid theoretic formulations of MPC is due to Richalet et al. [53], who proposed the so-called Model Predictive Heuristic Control (MPHC). MPHC uses a linear model, based on the impulse response and, in the presence of constraints, computes the process input via a heuristic iterative algorithm. In [23], the Dynamic Matrix Control (DMC) was introduced, which had a wide success in chemical process control both impulse and step models are used in DMC, while the process is described via a matrix of constant coefficients. In later formulations of DMC, constraints have been included in the optimization problem. Starting from the late 1980s, MPC algorithms using state-space models have been developed [38, 43], In parallel, Clarke et al. used transfer functions to formulate the so-called Generalized Predictive Control (GPC) [19-21] that turned out to be very popular in chemical process control. In the last two decades, a number of nonlinear MPC techniques has been developed [34,46, 57],... 

Constraints (7.27) represent the capacity limits at each supplier. The total order placed with a supplier should be less than or equal to the capacity available at the supplier. Note that the binary variable is used to activate the constraint for a supplier k only if k is chosen in the model. Constraints (7.28) introduce the demand constraints. Demand for product i at buyer j must be satisfied. Constraint (7.29) limits the number of selected suppliers to N. Constraints (7.30) and (7.31) are used to linearize the original nonlinear cost function that arises due to price discounts. The sequence 0 = is the... 

Let us recall the introducing paragraph to Section 9.4. From the statistical point of view, the detection and identification of gross errors based on nonlinear constraint equations is a delicate matter, even more than in the linear case. Some possibility is given when using the (pseudo)statistical characteristics of the solution (10.3.31) a. ff. 

Several useful methods have been proposed to overcome the variational coUapse problem, and a number of different schemes have been proposed for obtaining SCF wave functions for excited states [10, 16-26]. In recent years, there has been renewed interest in the orthogonality-constrained methods [14, 27] as weU as in the SCF theory for excited states [28-32]. It is clear that an experience accumulated for the HF excited state calculations can be useful to develop similar methods within density functional theory [33-36]. Some of these approaches [10, 18, 19, 23, 24, 26, 30-35] explicitly introduce orthogonality constraints to lower states. Other methods [21, 22, 25] either use this restriction implicitly or locate excited states as higher solutions of nonlinear SCF equations [29]. In latter type of scheme, the excited state SCF wave functions of interest are not necessarily orthogonal to the best SCF functions for a lower state or states of the same symmetry. 

---