No dependence on the recipient

No dependence on the recipient. All parameters are always Any. Hence one can as well omit them. This is the usual case with ordinary digital signature... 

Similar to the convention with risk bearers, a fail-stop signature scheme without further attributes is assumed to provide the most general service, i.e., no dependence on the recipient, but more restricted schemes can be more efficient, in particular in their test algorithms. The two most common cases are (see Figure 6.3) ... 

No dependence on the recipient. As mentioned in Section 5.3.2, such schemes are usually with memory-less receiving, but not always. A related structural property, however, is common to all existing schemes in this class The court s entity in a dispute acts as follows. 

As there is no dependence on the recipient, the entity of a recipient can test any signature even if the signer has given many signatures to other recipients before. Hence its actions in authentication have at least a special case where no information has been changed since initialization, i.e., where the parameters of test are only the message and the public key. This is the case the court s entity can use. 

According to Section 6.1.2, standard fail-stop signature schemes are with non-interactive authentication. Hence, as described in Section 5.3.2, one can identify two non-interactive algorithms sign and test. Moreover, there is no dependence on the recipient. 

Before the components of standard fail-stop signature schemes (in a conventional definition) are summarized in Definition 7.1, the specification parameters from Section 5.2.5 must be considered. Several of them have already been fixed for all standard fail-stop signature schemes, e.g., the set Dispute jresults and everything to do with sets of identities of recipients, because no dependence on the recipient is prescribed. Others cannot be seen in a conventional definition, such as Sign results. Two parameters remain, the message space and the set of message bounds. 

Schemes with non-interactive authentication and no dependence on the recipient. Then, as usual, test is used by the recipient s entity in authentication, and the recipients are the testers. 

No more than 3 AtroPen injections should be used unless the patient is under the supervision of a trained medical provider. Different dose strengths of the AtroPen are available depending on the recipient s age and weight. 

Schemes with more than one recipient per initialization (see Section 5.2.10, Dependence of Authentication on the Recipients ) are almost always memoryless at least, testing a new message must work no matter whether the earlier messages from the same signer had the same recipient or not. Similarly, courts are almost always memory-less . In contrast, the efficiency of schemes with fixed recipient or one recipient per initialization can often be improved by giving up memory-less receiving (see [FoPf91] or Section 10.6).

In principle, there is no distinction between active measures applied to recipients of different types of social security benefits. Initiatives to facilitate entry into the labour market for social assistance recipients, unemployment benefit recipients and sick benefit recipients are meant to be similar even though the unemployed belong in different systems depending on the unemployment insurance and the reasons for the lack of job. 

Congenital enzyme deficiencies may lead to an inability to utilise normal nutrients, with toxic consequences, or may increase the hazard from naturally occurring anutrients or from additives and contaminants. Toxicity therefore depends on the nature of the recipient as well as on the ingested material there is no single archetypal man, and "zero risk" is an unattainable goal. 

That is to say, possible can be said in relation to individual things in either of two ways, depending on whether it pertains in the first place to the subject or the form. The first (a) is to say that it is possible for a subject to be X, when that subject is presently not X. For example, if it is currently spring, I can point to a green leaf and say that it is possible for it to turn, say, yellowish brown (come autumn), in which case I will be referring to the substrate, which current is recipient to the accidental form of greenness, and its receptivity, under certain circumstances, to a form other than the one it currently has. Once the leaf turns yellowish brown, it will no longer be the case that the leaf is possibly yellowish brown, since it will actually be of this new colour. 

EP-guided arm arrhythmia suppression with either sotalol or amiodarone was first attempted (2) If unsuccessful, further treatment depended on haemodynamic status of the index event (1) No significant difference in survival between the two treatment arms (2) The survival of all trial patients who received an ICD was better than non-ICD recipients No significant impact of EP study on the diagnosis or the prognosis of patients presenting with VT, VF, or SCD... 

---