Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Nernst solute distribution between

The distribution of the solute, called the extractable complex or species, between the two immiscible solvents. This step can be quantitatively described by Nernst s distribution law, which states that the ratio of the concentrations of a solute distributing between two essentially immiscible solvents at constant temperature is a constant, provided that the solute is not involved in chemical interactions in either solvent phase (other than solvation). That is,... [Pg.606]

For either NaCl or for HOAc or for any other solute distributed between immiscible liquids at a fixed temperature and pressure, provided that the concentration of solute is low (i.e., for the dilute solution case), can be set equal to the partition constant Kj) because activity coefficients can be set equal to 1. The partition constant or Nernst distribution constant in our illustration for acetic acid partitioned between ether and water can be defined as... [Pg.79]

To understand the fundamental principles of extraction, the various terms used for expressing the effectiveness of a separation must first be considered. For a solute A distributed between two immiscible phases a and b, the Nernst Distribution (or Partition) Law states that, provided its molecular state is the same in both liquids and that the temperature is constant ... [Pg.162]

Figure 10,1 (A) Activity-molar concentration plot. Trace element concentration range is shown as a zone of constant slope where Henry s law is obeyed. Dashed lines and question marks at high dilution in some circumstances Henry s law has a limit also toward inhnite dilution. The intercept of Henry s law slope with ordinate axis defines Henry s law standard state chemical potential. (B) Deviations from Nernst s law behavior in a logarithmic plot of normalized trace/carrier distribution between solid phase s and ideal aqueous solution aq. Reproduced with modifications from liyama (1974), Bullettin de la Societee Francaise de Mineralogie et Cristallographie, 97, 143-151, by permission from Masson S.A., Paris, France. A in part A and log A in part B have the same significance, because both represent the result of deviations from Henry s law behavior in solid. Figure 10,1 (A) Activity-molar concentration plot. Trace element concentration range is shown as a zone of constant slope where Henry s law is obeyed. Dashed lines and question marks at high dilution in some circumstances Henry s law has a limit also toward inhnite dilution. The intercept of Henry s law slope with ordinate axis defines Henry s law standard state chemical potential. (B) Deviations from Nernst s law behavior in a logarithmic plot of normalized trace/carrier distribution between solid phase s and ideal aqueous solution aq. Reproduced with modifications from liyama (1974), Bullettin de la Societee Francaise de Mineralogie et Cristallographie, 97, 143-151, by permission from Masson S.A., Paris, France. A in part A and log A in part B have the same significance, because both represent the result of deviations from Henry s law behavior in solid.
Figure 10.4 shows normalized Ba/K and Sr/K distributions between sanidine and a hydrothermal solution (liyama, 1972), Li/K between muscovite and a hydrothermal solution (Voltinger, 1970), and Rb/Na between nepheline and a hydrothermal solution (Roux, 1971b), interpreted through the local lattice distortion model, by an appropriate choice of the Nernst s law mass distribution constant K and the lattice distortion propagation factor r. [Pg.665]

When two immiscible solvents are placed in contact, any substance soluble in both of them will distribute or partition between the two phases in a definite proportion. According to the Nernst partition isotherm, the following relationship holds for a solute partitioning between two phases a and b ... [Pg.46]

Prove that if a solute is distributed between two immiscible solvents (I and II), the ratio of the activities in the two solvents, i.e., ai/an, should be constant at constant temperature and pressure. Show that this result is the basis of the Nernst distribution law, i.e., ci/cii (or mi/mn) is constant for dilute solutions. [Pg.376]

Difficult separations can often be effected by liquid-liquid solvent extraction, which depends on differences in the distribution of solute species between two immiscible or partially immiscible phases. For a solute species A, this distribution is governed by the Nernst partition law... [Pg.362]

An important quantitative relation which holds in heterogeneous systems is thepartttton ordistribution) laWy enunciated by Berthelot and E. C. Jungfleisch. This states that a solute distributes itself between two immiscible (e.g. water and benzene) or partially miscible (e.g. water and ether) solvents in such a way that the ratio of its concentrations in each at a particular temperature is constant Ci[c2= k, Some apparent exceptions were shown independently by Nernst and Aulich to depend on the different molecular weights of the solute in the two solvents. [Pg.637]

An important technical application of liquid-liquid equilibria uses Nernst s law of phase distribution of a solute Y between two nonmiscible solvents to make up the two phases in contact, a and The equilibrium condition,... [Pg.99]

Nernst distribution law is stated as - when a solute distributes itself between two non-miscible solvents in contact with each other, there exists for similar molecular species at a constant temperature, a constant ratio of distribution between the two solvents irrespective of the amounts of the solute and the liquids. [Pg.216]

Works by Nernst [28, 32] constitute a fundamental contribution to the electrochemical analysis of the phase equilibrium between two immiscible electrolyte solutions. According to these works, in the above system electrical potentials originate from the difference of distribution coefficients of ions of the electrolyte present in both phases. Verwey and Niessen [96] described this problem in the following manner Excluding the case when one of the liquids is nonpolar and solubility or dissociation is equal to zero, each of the electrolytes added to the system, even in very small amounts, acts as the potential-forming electrolyte. The electrolyte, despite that it is unevenly distributed between the two phases, forms at the interface, as a result of the unequal distribution coefficients of cations and anions, an electrical double layer . [Pg.83]

The distribution of the third substance (solute) between the two phases is governed, to a first approximation, by its solubility in each of the two phases. Thus, at a definite temperature, the ratio of the concentration in each phase is a constant. This is the basis of the distribution law first stated by Berthelot and later extended by Nernst. Simply stated it is... [Pg.54]

The Nernst equation relates the electric potential A P resulting from an unequal distribution of a charged solute across a membrane permeable to that solute, to the ratio between the concentration of solute on one side and on the other ... [Pg.410]

Interface between two liquid solvents — Two liquid solvents can be miscible (e.g., water and ethanol) partially miscible (e.g., water and propylene carbonate), or immiscible (e.g., water and nitrobenzene). Mutual miscibility of the two solvents is connected with the energy of interaction between the solvent molecules, which also determines the width of the phase boundary where the composition varies (Figure) [i]. Molecular dynamic simulation [ii], neutron reflection [iii], vibrational sum frequency spectroscopy [iv], and synchrotron X-ray reflectivity [v] studies have demonstrated that the width of the boundary between two immiscible solvents comprises a contribution from thermally excited capillary waves and intrinsic interfacial structure. Computer calculations and experimental data support the view that the interface between two solvents of very low miscibility is molecularly sharp but with rough protrusions of one solvent into the other (capillary waves), while increasing solvent miscibility leads to the formation of a mixed solvent layer (Figure). In the presence of an electrolyte in both solvent phases, an electrical potential difference can be established at the interface. In the case of two electrolytes with different but constant composition and dissolved in the same solvent, a liquid junction potential is temporarily formed. Equilibrium partition of ions at the - interface between two immiscible electrolyte solutions gives rise to the ion transfer potential, or to the distribution potential, which can be described by the equivalent two-phase Nernst relationship. See also - ion transfer at liquid-liquid interfaces. [Pg.358]

Distribution (Nernst) potential — Multi-ion partition equilibria at the -> interface between two immiscible electrolyte solutions give rise to a -> Galvanipotential difference, Af(j> = (j>w- 0°, where 0wand cj>°are the -> inner potentials of phases w and o. This potential difference is called the distribution potential [i]. The theory was developed for the system of N ionic species i (i = 1,2..N) in each phase on the basis of the -> Nernst equation, the -> electroneutrality condition, and the mass-conservation law [ii]. At equilibrium, the equality of the - electrochemical potentials of the ions in the adjacent phases yields the Nernst equation for the ion-transfer potential,... [Pg.531]

Distribution potential established when ionic species are partitioned in equilibrium between the aqueous and organic phases, W and O, is a fundamental quantity in electrochemistry at liquid-liquid interfaces, through which the equilibrium properties of the system are determined. In any system composed of two immiscible electrolyte solutions in contact with each other, the equilibrium is characterized by the equality of the electrochemical or chemical potentials for each ionic or neutral species, respectively, commonly distributed in the two phases [4]. It follows from the former equality that the distribution potential Aq inner electrical potential of the aqueous phase, 0, with respect to the inner potential of the organic phase, 0°, is given by the Nernst equation [17,18],... [Pg.301]

The equilibrium constant Ki(T,p), which is independent of mole fraction is called the distribution or partition coefficient of the substance i between the solutions 1 and 2. This equation is the generalized form of the Nernst distribution law. [Pg.326]

In other words, the mole fraction ratio of / in the coexisting phases at equilibrium for a given T and P should be constant. This is Nernst s law (cf. Lewis and Randall 1961). K is also called the distribution coefficient, often symbolized by >, and is used in the study of trace element partitioning between coexisting mineral solid solutions. [Pg.12]

DYNAMICS OF DISTRIBUTION The natural aqueous system is a complex multiphase system which contains dissolved chemicals as well as suspended solids. The metals present in such a system are likely to distribute themselves between the various components of the solid phase and the liquid phase. Such a distribution may attain (a) a true equilibrium or (b) follow a steady state condition. If an element in a system has attained a true equilibrium, the ratio of element concentrations in two phases (solid/liquid), in principle, must remain unchanged at any given temperature. The mathematical relation of metal concentrations in these two phases is governed by the Nernst distribution law (41) commonly called the partition coefficient (1 ) and is defined as = s) /a(l) where a(s) is the activity of metal ions associated with the solid phase and a( ) is the activity of metal ions associated with the liquid phase (dissolved). This behavior of element is a direct consequence of the dynamics of ionic distribution in a multiphase system. For dilute solution, which generally obeys Raoult s law (41) activity (a) of a metal ion can be substituted by its concentration, (c) moles L l or moles Kg i. This ratio (Kd) serves as a comparison for relative affinity of metal ions for various components-exchangeable, carbonate, oxide, organic-of the solid phase. Chemical potential which is a function of several variables controls the numerical values of Kd (41). [Pg.257]

I he simplest is the partition of a solute between two immiscible solvents. In this case [0] /[Z)], = K, where K is the partition coefficient. This equilibrium is often referred to as the Nernst distribution. When [Z)], is plotted against [Z)], at constant temperature the curve is a straight line which terminates at the point when both the fibre and the dyebath are saturated. There are slight deviations from the linearity of the curve, particularly as the solutions become more concentrated. This system is probably exhibited in its ideal form when dyeing cellulose acetate rayon from an alcoholic dye solution, but it is also essentially true in the case of the application of disperse dyes in aqueous suspension to cellulose acetate, because the dyes are all soluble in water to a very limited extent and the undissolved particles act as a reservoir to maintain the concentration of the solution. The curve for this isotherm is shown in Fig. 12.14. [Pg.326]

The probability distribution functions in Eq. [59] applied to the trajectories of particles flowing into and out of a system provides a justification for using the Nernst-Planck equation (Eq. [54]) The net ionic directional fluxes can be expressed in terms of differences between the probability fluxes, normalized to the concentration at the sides of the region of interest. That ionic fluxes and differences in probability fluxes are related thus supplies a connection between the solution of the Nernst-Planck equation (Eq. [54]) and the Smoluchowski equation (Eq. [59]), and it provides a direct justification for using Eq. [54] for the study of ions subjected to Brownian dynamics in solution. [Pg.276]

The evolution of the numerical approaches used for solving the PNP equations has paralleled the evolution of computing hardware. The numerical solution to the PNP equations evolved over the time period of a couple of decades beginning with the simulation of extremely simplified structures " ° to fully three-dimensional models, and with the implementation of sophisticated variants of the algorithmic schemes to increase robustness and performance. Even finite element tetrahedral discretization schemes have been employed successfully to selectively increase the resolution in regions inside the channels. An important aspect of the numerical procedures described is the need for full self-consistency between the force field and the charge distribution in space. It is obtained by coupling a Poisson solver to the Nernst-Planck solver within the iteration scheme described. [Pg.280]


See other pages where Nernst solute distribution between is mentioned: [Pg.2405]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.261]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.301]    [Pg.307]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.918]    [Pg.669]    [Pg.371]    [Pg.368]    [Pg.371]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.371]    [Pg.508]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.557]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.436]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.2404]   


SEARCH



Nernst

Nernst distribution

© 2024 chempedia.info