Navier-Stokes equation conditions

Surface waves at an interface between two innniscible fluids involve effects due to gravity (g) and surface tension (a) forces. (In this section, o denotes surface tension and a denotes the stress tensor. The two should not be coiifiised with one another.) In a hydrodynamic approach, the interface is treated as a sharp boundary and the two bulk phases as incompressible. The Navier-Stokes equations for the two bulk phases (balance of macroscopic forces is the mgredient) along with the boundary condition at the interface (surface tension o enters here) are solved for possible hamionic oscillations of the interface of the fomi, exp [-(iu + s)t + i V-.r], where m is the frequency, is the damping coefficient, s tlie 2-d wavevector of the periodic oscillation and. ra 2-d vector parallel to the surface. For a liquid-vapour interface which we consider, away from the critical point, the vapour density is negligible compared to the liquid density and one obtains the hydrodynamic dispersion relation for surface waves + s>tf. The temi gq in the dispersion relation arises from... 

Clearly then, the continuum approach as outlined above is faulty. Furthermore, since our erroneous result depends only on the non-slip boundary condition for V together with the Navier-Stokes equation (4.3), one or... 

Papanastasiou et al. (1992) suggested that in order to generate realistic solutions for Navier-Stokes equations the exit conditions should be kept free (i.e. no outflow conditions should be imposed). In this approach application of Green s theorem to the equations corresponding to the exit boundary nodes is avoided. This is eqvrivalent to imposing no exit conditions if elements with... 

Exact Solutions to the Navier-Stokes Equations. As was tme for the inviscid flow equations, exact solutions to the Navier-Stokes equations are limited to fairly simple configurations that aHow for considerable simplification both in the equation and in the boundary conditions. For the important situation of steady, fully developed, laminar, Newtonian flow in a circular tube, for example, the Navier-Stokes equations reduce to... 

Because the Navier-Stokes equations are first-order in pressure and second-order in velocity, their solution requires one pressure bound-aiy condition and two velocity boundaiy conditions (for each velocity component) to completely specify the solution. The no sBp condition, whicn requires that the fluid velocity equal the velocity or any bounding solid surface, occurs in most problems. Specification of velocity is a type of boundary condition sometimes called a Dirichlet condition. Often boundary conditions involve stresses, and thus velocity gradients, rather than the velocities themselves. Specification of velocity derivatives is a Neumann boundary condition. For example, at the boundary between a viscous liquid and a gas, it is often assumed that the liquid shear stresses are zero. In numerical solution of the Navier-... 

E. Bansch, B. Hdhn. Numerical treatment of the Navier-Stokes equations with slip-boundary condition. Preprint 9-98, Mathematische Fakultat Freiburg. SIAM J Sci Comput (submitted). 

The incompressible Navier-Stokes equations are obtained by substituting the above form for into the generalized Euler equation (equation 9.9) and by using the incompressibility condition (5 ) dvijdxi = 0 equation 9.4) and Euler s equation dvijdt = -Y k Vkidvi/dxk) - dp/dxi) equation 9.7) ... 

These conditions show us immediately that in the case of the four-neighbor HPP lattice (V = 4) f is noni.sotropic, and the macroscopic equations therefore cannot yield a Navier-Stokes equation. For the hexagonal FHP lattice, on the other hand, we have V = 6 and P[. is isotropic through order Wolfram [wolf86c] predicts what models are conducive to f lavier-Stokes-like dynamics by using group theory to analyze the symmetry of tensor structures for polygons and polyhedra in d-dimensions. 

In Spite of the existence of numerous experimental and theoretical investigations, a number of principal problems related to micro-fluid hydrodynamics are not well-studied. There are contradictory data on the drag in micro-channels, transition from laminar to turbulent flow, etc. That leads to difficulties in understanding the essence of this phenomenon and is a basis for questionable discoveries of special microeffects (Duncan and Peterson 1994 Ho and Tai 1998 Plam 2000 Herwig 2000 Herwig and Hausner 2003 Gad-el-Hak 2003). The latter were revealed by comparison of experimental data with predictions of a conventional theory based on the Navier-Stokes equations. The discrepancy between these data was interpreted as a display of new effects of flow in micro-channels. It should be noted that actual conditions of several experiments were often not identical to conditions that were used in the theoretical models. For this reason, the analysis of sources of disparity between the theory and experiment is of significance. 

Wu and Cheng (2003) measured the friction factor of laminar flow of de-ionized water in smooth silicon micro-channels of trapezoidal cross-section with hydraulic diameters in the range of 25.9 to 291.0 pm. The experimental data were found to be in agreement within 11% with an existing theoretical solution for an incompressible, fully developed, laminar flow in trapezoidal channels under the no-slip boundary condition. It is confirmed that Navier-Stokes equations are still valid for the laminar flow of de-ionized water in smooth micro-channels having hydraulic diameter as small as 25.9 pm. For smooth channels with larger hydraulic diameters of 103.4-103.4-291.0pm, transition from laminar to turbulent flow occurred at Re = 1,500-2,000. 

Turbulent inlet conditions for LES are difficult to obtain since a time-resolved flow description is required. The best solution is to use periodic boundary conditions when it is possible. For the remaining cases, there are algorithms for simulation of turbulent eddies that fit the theoretical turbulent energy distribution. These simulated eddies are not a solution of the Navier-Stokes equations, and the inlet boundary must be located outside the region of interest to allow the flow to adjust to the correct physical properties. 

We use computational solution of the steady Navier-Stokes equations in cylindrical coordinates to determine the optimal operating conditions.Fortunately in most CVD processes the active gases that lead to deposition are present in only trace amounts in a carrier gas. Since the active gases are present in such small amounts, their presence has a negligible effect on the flow of the carrier. Thus, for the purposes of determining the effects of buoyancy and confinement, the simulations can model the carrier gas alone (or with simplified chemical reaction models) - an enormous reduction in the problem size. This approach to CVD modeling has been used extensively by Jensen and his coworkers (cf. Houtman, et al.) ... 

An Eulerian-Eulerian (EE) approach was adopted to simulate the dispersed gas-liquid flow. The EE approach treats both the primary liquid phase and the dispersed gas phase as interpenetrating continua, and solves a set of Navier-Stokes equations for each phase. Velocity inlet and outlet boundary conditions were employed in the liquid phase, whilst the gas phase conditions consisted of a velocity inlet and pressure outlet. Turbulence within the system was account for with the Standard k-e model, implemented on a per-phase basis, similar to the recent work of Bertola et. al.[4]. A more detailed description of the computational setup of the EE method can be found in Pareek et. al.[5]. 

In the first two cases the Navier-Stokes equation can be applied, in the second case with modified boundary conditions. The computationally most difficult case is the transition flow regime, which, however, might be encountered in micro-reactor systems. Clearly, the defined ranges of Knudsen numbers are not rigid rather they vary from case to case. However, the numbers given above are guidelines applicable to many situations encoimtered in practice. 

For applications in the field of micro reaction engineering, the conclusion may be drawn that the Navier-Stokes equation and other continuum models are valid in many cases, as Knudsen numbers greater than 10 are rarely obtained. However, it might be necessary to use slip boimdaty conditions. The first theoretical investigations on slip flow of gases were carried out in the 19th century by Maxwell and von Smoluchowski. The basic concept relies on a so-called slip length L, which relates the local shear strain to the relative flow velocity at the wall ... 

Since MPC dynamics yields the hydrodynamic equations on long distance and time scales, it provides a mesoscopic simulation algorithm for investigation of fluid flow that complements other mesoscopic methods. Since it is a particle-based scheme it incorporates fluctuations, which are essential in many applications. For macroscopic fluid flow averaging is required to obtain the deterministic flow fields. In spite of the additional averaging that is required the method has the advantage that it is numerically stable, does not suffer from lattice artifacts in the structure of the Navier-Stokes equations, and boundary conditions are easily implemented. 

If the Brownian particles were macroscopic in size, the solvent could be treated as a viscous continuum, and the particles would couple to the continuum solvent through appropriate boundary conditions. Then the two-particle friction may be calculated by solving the Navier-Stokes equations in the presence of the two fixed particles. The simplest approximation for hydrodynamic interactions is through the Oseen tensor [54],... 

However, one difference exists with classical theory in this latter case, the Navier-Stokes equation (443) and the incompressibility condition (444) are assumed to be valid for all distances rict. In this case, it is an easy matter to calculate explicitly the higher-order terms in Eq. (445), and the boundary condition at the B-particle (assumed to be spherical) imposes the condition... 

At high Reynolds number, the velocity U(x, t) is a random field, i.e., for fixed time t = t the function U(x, D varies randomly with respect to x. This behavior is illustrated in Fig. 2.1 for a homogeneous turbulent flow. Likewise, for fixed x = x lJ(x. t) is a random process with respect to t. This behavior is illustrated in Fig. 2.2. The meaning of random in the context of turbulent flows is simply that a variable may have a different value each time an experiment is repeated under the same set of flow conditions (Pope 2000). It does not imply, for example, that the velocity field evolves erratically in time and space in an unpredictable fashion. Indeed, due to the fact that it must satisfy the Navier-Stokes equation, (1.27), U(x, t) is differentiable in both time and space and thus is relatively smooth. ... 

For homogeneous turbulent flows (no walls, periodic boundary conditions, zero mean velocity), pseudo-spectral methods are usually employed due to their relatively high accuracy. In order to simulate the Navier-Stokes equation,... 

Equations (if.4) and (ff.S) are solved, along with the continuity equation (which does not change upon nondimensionalization), in a Cartesian coordinate system using the Fourier-Galerkin (spectral) technique under periodic boundary conditions in all three space dimensions. The scheme is similar to that used by Orszag [8] for direct solution of the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. More details can be found in [9] and [7], and the scheme may be considered to be pseudospectral. ... 

---