Multiconfigurational second-order limits

The various response tensors are identified as terms in these series and are calculated using numerical derivatives of the energy. This method is easily implemented at any level of theory. Analytic derivative methods have been implemented using self-consistent-field (SCF) methods for a, ft and y, using multiconfiguration SCF (MCSCF) methods for ft and using second-order perturbation theory (MP2) for y". The response properties can also be determined in terms of sum-over-states formulation, which is derived from a perturbation theory treatment of the field operator — [iE, which in the static limit is equivalent to the results obtained by SCF finite field or analytic derivative methods. 

The second problem centers about the use of an approximate ground-state wave function that eminates from a multiconfigurational zeroth-order approximation. The N2 calculations in Section III.C suggest that the restriction to a single configuration zeroth-order ground state imposes a fundamental limitation on the quality of the calculated EOM ionization potentials for that system. 

In this substection we will shortly discuss the computational methods used for calculation of the spin-spin coupling constants. Two main approaches available are ab initio theory from Hartree-Fock (or self-consistent field SCF) technique to its correlated extensions, and density function theory (DFT), where the electron density, instead of the wave function, is the fundamental quantity. The discussion here is limited to the methods actually used for calculation of the intermolecular spin-spin coupling constants, i. e. multiconfigurational self consistent field (MCSCF) theory, coupled cluster (CC) theory and density functional theory (DFT). For example, the second order polarization propagator method (SOPPA) approach is not... 

---