Money economy

Although it is well beyond the scope of this study, it seems possible to think about the economy of race (its production and circulation as value) together with the historical development of a money economy conventionally understood. A diacritical reading of, for example, Leyshon and Thrift (1996) with Lott (1999) might prove fruitful. 

Converting Heat to Work. There has been a historic bias in the chemical industry to think of energy use in terms of fuel and steam (qv) systems. A more fundamental approach is to minimise the input of work potential embedded in the fuel and feedstock, as well as work purchased direcdy as electricity. Steam is really just a medium of exchange, like money in an economy. 

Plastic materials manufacturing is primarily a large-volume, low-cost, low-unit profit margin business with great overall economies. The plastics generally compete with each other on a money value basis in which an economic analysis takes into account the differing densities of the various plastics in order to judge them on a cost per pound or volume basis. 

Russia, a developed country, is part of the Annex 1 bloc of countries committed to cutting emissions under the protocol. But its economy has shrunk so drastically since 1990 that it cannot afford to bum the fuel that would produce the emissions Kyoto entitles it to. Its emissions have fallen by almost 40% in a decade. So it favours emissions trading, selling its unused entitlement to developed countries wanting to emit more than the protocol allows them. Russia will ratify Kyoto, because it recognises it as a way of earning desperately needed money. It plans to use the cash for energy efficiency projects. 

A chain of events in which each link was precision-made. Should international society be any more lenient with men who had exploited the economies of whole countries, aiding and abetting the suffering of millions of people, than any local community was toward the robber who held up the owner of the comer store, took his money, and killed him in the course of the robbery It was, I thought, one element of a very persuasive theory. 

In one sense, the gold standard already was a moral notion for economists. It was the prime manifestation of what Nicholas Mayhew has called a moral idea of money (2000, xi)—the idea that a gold-backed currency is a constant and unchanging currency unit with which to measure personal or public obligations (xi). The gold standard was meant to ensure stability in both the domestic economy and international trade, and it was almost an article of faith for most economists. As Mayhew notes, So irrevocable did it all seem that when the [British] National government of 1931 did eventually devalue and abandon gold, its Labour Cabinet predecessors complained that no one had told them you could do that (214-15). 

In order to make his concerns about a precious-metal-based economy all the more devastating, Serviss s novel posits a perfectly functioning gold standard that achieves all the aims that the classic gold standard never entirely achieved in reality. The narrator explains that after the abundance of silver rendered it unsuitable for money, it was entirely removed from coins... 

What is to be done to make cleaner production profitable, as is the case in the West One source might be those fines that are imposed on violators of environmental laws in transition economy countries. However, no mechanisms of channeling this money to environmental investments are available so far. 

A hydrogen economy may require the expenditure of hundreds of billions of dollars for an entirely new energy infrastructure of pipelines, fueling stations and power sources. This will come from public and private money. 

Furthermore, a major shortcoming of the supply-side Marxists is their failure to consider the importance of money. In Brody (1974 9), for example Theories of money... are not discussed, although a parallel mathematical approach to them is much needed and indeed within reach (see also Roemer 1978). The problem is that money is essentially neutral in general equilibrium models, a characteristic more appropriate to a barter economy than to capitalism. And in the Grossmann falling rate of profit thesis, money is stripped from the reproduction schema despite its central importance to Capital, volume 2. 

This is an ex post identity between total profits (P ) and the economy s output of capital goods (W ) and capitalists consumption goods (W2). Kalecki poses the key question as to how we should interpret this identity. Are expenditures upon capital goods and capitalists consumption goods determined by profits, or are profits determined by these expenditures He argues that capitalists can decide how much they will invest and consume next year, but they cannot decide how much they shall sell and profit (ibid. 461). It is the money expenditures by capitalists upon consumption and investment that generate the resultant volume of profits. 

What is more, these equally valid ways of defining value are consistent with a macroeconomic interpretation of the autonomous role of money. Since under the Kalecki principle capitalists earn what they spend, the social validation of the market, led by capitalist investment and consumption, is the starting point for economic activity. Commodities are only produced, labour is only employed, if capitalists cast into circulation the money required for sales to be realized - for labour embodied in commodities to become socially necessary. Since money, with its specific role in a capitalist economy, is so central to the Kalecki principle, a possible synthesis can be suggested with the value-form approach without, that is, compromising the use of a Leontief/Keynesian multiplier framework together with embodied labour categories. 

What sets this circuit approach apart is its institutionally relevant analysis of the relationship between banks, firms and workers. A model of the circuit of money is developed in which prime importance is placed upon the role of banks in financing industrial activities. Central to this approach is an application of the Kalecki principle, that capitalists earn what they spend the question being how an injection of money can circulate around the economy and return back to the capitalists. Moreover, how is this circuit of money intertwined with the activities of industrial sectors And how much money is required for the circuit to be complete Marx s reproduction schema provides a natural starting point for addressing these questions. 

In contrast to the single swap approach, however, it can also be argued that the money required for additional capital can be advanced without advancing the whole of the economy s gross income. In Marx s terminology it may... 

---