Momentum shift operator

In this exercise, we introduce the angular-momentum shift operators... 

Bonifacic and Huzinaga[3] use explicit core orbital projection operators, while orbital angular momentum projection operators are used by Goddard, Kahn and Melius[4], by Barthelat and Durand[5] and others. Explicit core orbital projection operators can, in the full basis set, be viewed as shift operators which ensure that the first root in the Fock matrix really corresponds to a valence orbital. However, in applications the basis set is always modified and the role of the core orbital projection operators thus partly changes. 

Three important examples of pure spin operators are the raising and lowering operators S and Si (also known as the step-up and step-down operators or as the shift operators) and the operator for the z component of the spin angular momentum S. From the effect of these operators on the spin functions (again assuming a one-particle state)... 

For a coupled spin system, the matrix of the Liouvillian must be calculated in the basis set for the spin system. Usually this is a simple product basis, often called product operators, since the vectors in Liouville space are spm operators. The matrix elements can be calculated in various ways. The Liouvillian is the conmuitator with the Hamiltonian, so matrix elements can be calculated from the commutation rules of spin operators. Alternatively, the angular momentum properties of Liouville space can be used. In either case, the chemical shift temis are easily calculated, but the coupling temis (since they are products of operators) are more complex. In section B2.4.2.7. the Liouville matrix for the single-quantum transitions for an AB spin system is presented. 

This term describes a shift in energy by Acim rn, for an orbital with quantum numbers I — 2, mi and that is proportional to the average orbital angular momentum (/z) for the TOj-spin subsystem and the so-called Racah parameters Bm, that in turn can be represented by the Coulomb integrals and The operator that corresponds to this energy shift is given by... 

The equations to be fulfilled by momentum space orbitals contain convolution integrals which give rise to momentum orbitals ( )(p-q) shifted in momentum space. The so-called form factor F and the interaction terms Wij defined in terms of current momentum coordinates are the momentum space counterparts of the core potentials and Coulomb and/or exchange operators in position space. The nuclear field potential transfers a momentum to electron i, while the interelectronic interaction produces a momentum transfer between each pair of electrons in turn. Nevertheless, the total momentum of the whole molecule remains invariant thanks to the contribution of the nuclear momenta [7]. 

Fig. 4.10. The labels in the lopes denote the sign of the shifts. Note, the apparent similarity with real J-orbitals is not accidental but results from the underlying equivalence of the operators for quadrupole interaction and the angular momentum with L = 2...

Here /(R) and pflX) denote the shift and generalized momentum for the molecular vibration of the low frequency a>9 and reduced mass m, at the Rth site of the adsorbate lattice bi+(K) and K) are creation and annihilation operators for the collectivized mode of the adsorbate that is characterized by the squared frequency /2(K) = ml + d>, a,(K)/m , with O / iat(K) representing the Fourier component of the force constant function /jat(R). Shifts i//(R) for all molecules are assumed to be oriented in the same arbitrary direction specified by the unit vector e they are related to the corresponding normal coordinates, ue (K), and secondary quantization operators ... 

We can make further approximations to simplify the NRF of the Hamiltonian presented in equation (75) for non-dynamical properties. For such properties, we can freeze the nuclear movements and study only the electronic problem. This is commonly known as the clamped nuclei approximation, and it usually is quite good because of the fact that the nuclei of a molecule are about 1836 times more massive than the electrons, so we can usually think of the nuclei moving slowly in the average field of the electrons, which are able to adapt almost instantaneously to the nuclear motion. Invocation of the clamped nuclei approximation to equation (75) causes all the nuclear contributions which involve the nuclear momentum operator to vanish and the others to become constants (nuclear repulsion, etc.). These constant terms will only shift the total energy of the system. The remaining terms in the Hamiltonian are electronic terms and nuclear-electronic interaction contributions which do not involve the nuclear momentum operator. 

For the establishment of the realistic limit, one has to take account of the rates of processes in which mass, heat, momentum, and chemical energy are transferred. In this so-called finite-time, finite-size thermodynamics, it is usually possible to establish optimal conditions for operating the process, namely, with a minimum, but nonzero, entropy generation and loss of work. Such optima seem to be characterized by a universal principle equiparti-tioning of the process s driving forces in time and space. The optima may eventually be shifted by including economic and environmental parameters such as fixed and variable costs and emissions. For this aspect, we refer to Chapter 13. 

The approximations surrounding the definition of the J operator comprise the momentum-jump approximation. This translation or shift of the momentum corresponds precisely to the amount of energy transferred during a transition... 

The Dirac equation is of the same order in all variables (space and time), since the momentum operator p (= — iV) involves a first-order differentiation with respect to the space variables. It should be noted that the free electron rest energy in eq. (8.3) is mc, equal to 0.511 MeV, while this situation is defined as zero in the non-relativistic case. The zero point of the energy scale is therefore shifted by 0.511 MeV, a large amount compared with the binding energy of 13.6eV for a hydrogen atom. The two energy... 

Before describing the simulation algorithm, it is useful to discuss an approximation to the operator J, defined in (45), which is responsible for both quantum transitions and associated momentum changes in the bath. This operator is difficult to evaluate because it involves derivatives with respect to bath particle momenta. We make an approximation to the (1 + Sajs/2) (d/dP)) operator in J so that its action on any function of the momenta yields the function evaluated at a shifted momentum value [4,6,26,27]. 

---