Molecules, stereospecific structures

Although structurally-diverse as evidenced above, the insecticidal pyrethroids still conform to a unique, operationally-defined, structure-activity relationship based on the physical characteristics and three-dimensional shape of the entire molecule conforming to those originally evidenced in the natural pyrethrins [13]. From this relationship, it becomes apparent that there is no single molecular aspect or reactive moiety that serves as a true toxophore for the pyrethroids and that their actions at target sites are dependent upon the entire stereospecific structure of these insecticides [1]. 

The relative ranking of ligands for the description of the stereochemical properties of a molecule is the most utilized and accepted principle throughout stereochemical nomenclature. This is not yet the practice, however, in discussing the stereochemistry in coordination and inorganic chemistry. In the context of coordination and inorganic chemistry, stereochemical information is either presented in the more traditional terminology, or more often by means of a stereospecific structural representation. 

Making clear the role of asymmetric intermolecular interactions due to the stereospecific structures of molecules is really significant for understanding the mechanisms of reactions in chemistry and biochemistry. 

The senior author measured the enthalpies of mixing aqueous solutions of some D- and L-optical isomers earlier with Amaya and found that measurable amounts of heats of mixing were obtained even in aqueous media. For the molecular inclusion phenomena also the stereospecific structures of molecules concerned must play important roles. 

The molecule has a symmetrical structure and therefore questions of stereospecificity do not arise. 

All of the structures shown in Figures 7.2 and 7.3 are D-configurations, and the D-forms of monosaccharides predominate in nature, just as L-amino acids do. These preferences, established in apparently random choices early in evolution, persist uniformly in nature because of the stereospecificity of the enzymes that synthesize and metabolize these small molecules. 

Stereospecificity suggests that there are three geometrically distinct determinants of the structure which are important to agonist efficacy and potency, whereas previous models only utilized two features. A hydrophobic pocket may also be important 20) this could be supplied by the [4.2.1]nonene structure. Our intentions are to explore the domains of the agonist molecule to determine the specific determinants of agonist activity. 

The photochemical behaviour of 7 OEt is the first example in which the reaction of achiral molecules in an achiral crystal packing does not occur at random but stereospecifically, resulting in a syndiotactic structure. As no external chiral catalyst exists in the reaction, the above result is a unique type of topochemical induction , which is initiated by chance in the formation of the first cyclobutane ring, but followed by syndiotactic cyclobutane formation due to steric repulsions in the crystal cavity. That is, the syndiotactic structure is evolved under moderate control of the reacting crystal lattice. 

The mechanism and stereochemistry of the orthoester Claisen rearrangement is analogous to the Cope rearrangement. The reaction is stereospecific with respect to the double bond present in the initial allylic alcohol. In acyclic molecules, the stereochemistry of the product can usually be predicted on the basis of a chairlike TS.233 When steric effects or ring geometry preclude a chairlike structure, the reaction can proceed through a boatlike TS.234... 

Notably, 161 and 163 have different 3IP chemical shift values. The anions of these molecules have different spatial structures. A H and 3IP NMR study showed that the anion of 161 adopts a twist conformation, whereas 163 exists in a chair conformation with an equatorial phenyl at the phosphorus atom. Thus, ion exchange reactions are stereospecific. 

Optical isomerism is the result of a dissymmetry in molecular suhstitution. The basic aspects of optical isomerism are discussed in various textbooks of organic chemistry. Optical isomers (enantiomers) may have different physiological activities from each other provided that their interaction with a receptor or some other effector structure involves the asymmetric carbon atom of the enantiomeric molecule and that the three different substituents on this carbon atom interact with the receptor. The Easson-Stedman hypothesis assumes that a three-point interaction ensures stereospecificity, since only one of the enantiomers will fit the other one is capable of a two-point attachment only, as shown in figure 1.13 for the reaction with a hypothetical planar receptor. However, it is reasonable to assume that receptor stereospecificity can also undergo a change when the receptor conformation is altered by a receptor-drug interaction. 

---