Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Molecules distributive invariants

An analogous situation may be more familiar. Let pt be a nonthermal distribution of the internal states of, say, diatomic molecules diluted in an excess of monoatomic buffer gas. Owing to collisions, the distribution p, will relax to a final, unique equilibrium distribution. Let p be that equilibrium distribution A/J [ = A(Ej — j)] is the evolution matrix. It converts any initial distribution to a unique final distribution and it leaves the equilibrium distribution invariant p° = Ajjpf- Given the unique final equilibrium distribution p°, we have no way whatever of knowing which was the initial nonequilibrium distribution which relaxed to it. [Pg.77]

At the gel point, (3 —l) = l/p, which with the foregoing expression gives Eq. (14), thus establishing equivalence of the two procedures. The primary molecules in a condensation polymer must almost invariably conform to a most probable distribution (see Chap. VIII). The random cross-linking of primary molecules otherwise distributed in size has no counterpart in polyfunctional condensation, therefore. [Pg.360]

The methyl group responds to the difference in the three-dimensional electron density distribution about the two nearest ring CC bonds, and the natural bond orders most simply quantifies the key difference in a unified manner across many molecules. At one extreme, 2-methylpropene has essentially localized single and double bonds (03-0b = 1) and a 1010 cm-1 barrier. At the other extreme, when the geometry of the ring has good local C2v symmetry, as in the S0 state of toluene, m-fluorotoluene, p-fluorotoluene, 3,5-difluorotoluene, and 2,6-difluorotoluene, 03 - Ob and the barrier is invariably very small, even for nominal threefold cases. We interpret this equality of bond orders as indicative of essentially equal contributions of the two dominant resonance structures at all a. [Pg.178]

To support this hypothesis, the OBC sample can be fractionated by the TREF experiment. TREF fractionation of the OBC, followed by evaluation of the octene content by 13C NMR, reveals the data shown in Fig. 21. For a polymer blend, each molecule dissolves and elutes according to its comonomer content. The results invariably fall on the line in Fig. 21 labeled random copolymer line. The triangles reveal the comonomer content of the TREF fractions from an OBC. At any given temperature, the polymer eluting has much more comonomer than would be expected for a random distribution. The only explanation is that the comonomer is blocked, as expected from the chain shuttling mechanism. The extent of deviation can even be quantified, and a new method was recently invented to determine the block index for a given polyolefin [46],... [Pg.95]

Therefore size reduction may not always provide the intended advantage. Nevertheless, enhanced distribution into the central core of the tumor is likely to result in better overall control of tumor growth and disease progression. While the benefit of improved tissue penetration is debated, it is clear that modification of antibody molecules by reducing their size through enzyme digestion will invariably increase the plasma clearance. [Pg.283]

We will start by describing the relevant aspects of the classical dynamics, introducing the concepts of the invariant set and the repeller, the Smale horseshoe and its symbolic dynamics, and the bifurcations at their origin [19]. We then turn to the semiclassical quantization based on the Gutzwiller trace formula and the zeta functions. We proceed to show how this new theoretical framework allows us to explain the distribution of resonances in several molecules like Hgl2, CO2, and H3, to calculate their lifetimes, and to provide a synthesis with respect to previous work. [Pg.542]

In common with other application areas of chromatographic separation, a considerable amount of effort has been expended recently on the development of different elution conditions and types of stationary phases for peptide separations in attempts to maximize column selectivities without adversely affecting column efficiences. Peptide retention will invariably be mediated by the participation of electrostatic, hydrogen bonding, and hydrophobic interactions in the distribution phenomenon. The nature of the predominant distribution mechanism will be dependent on the physical and chemical characteristics of the stationary phase as well as the nature of the molecular forces which hold the solute molecules within the mobile and stationary zones. The retention of the solute in all HPLC modes can be described by the equation... [Pg.91]


See other pages where Molecules distributive invariants is mentioned: [Pg.78]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.439]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.291]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.429]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.539]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.269]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.601]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.3823]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.303]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.609]    [Pg.158]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.70 ]




SEARCH



Molecule distribution

© 2024 chempedia.info