Molecules configuration interaction

Benchmark Studies on Small Molecules Configuration Interaction Gradient Theory Green s Functions and Propagators for Chemistry Molecular Magnetic Properties Mpl-ler-Plesset Perturbation Theory ru-Dependent Wavefunc-tions Spin Contamination. 

Benchmark Studies on Small Molecules Configuration Interaction Coupled-cluster Theory Density Functional Theory (DFT), Hartree-Fock (HF), and the Self-consistent Field Geometry Optimization 1 Geometry Optimization 2 ... 

Bundgen P, Grein F and Thakkar A J 1995 Dipole and quadrupole moments of small molecules. An ab initio study using perturbatively corrected, multi-reference, configuration interaction wavefunctions J. Mol. Struct. (Theochem) 334 7... 

First-principles models of solid surfaces and adsorption and reaction of atoms and molecules on those surfaces range from ab initio quantum chemistry (HF configuration interaction (Cl), perturbation theory (PT), etc for details see chapter B3.1 ) on small, finite clusters of atoms to HF or DFT on two-dimensionally infinite slabs. In between these... 

NakatsujI H and Nakal H 1990 Theoretical study on molecular and dissociative chemisorptions of an O2 molecule on an Ag surface dipped adcluster model combined with symmetry-adapted cluster-configuration interaction method Chem. Phys. Lett. 174 283-6... 

HyperChem always com putes the electron ic properties for the molecule as the last step of a geometry optimization or molecular dyn am ics calcu lation. However, if you would like to perform a configuration interaction calculation at the optimized geometry, an additional sin gle poin t calcu lation is requ ired with theCI option being turned on. 

Correlated calculations, such as configuration interaction, DFT, MPn, and coupled cluster calculations, can be used to model small organic molecules with high-end workstations or supercomputers. These are some of the most accurate calculations done routinely. Correlation is not usually required for qualitative or even quantitative results for organic molecules. It is needed to obtain high-accuracy quantitative results. 

The simplest many-electron wave function that satisfies the Exclusion Principle is a product of N different one-electron functions that have been antisymmetrized, or written as a determinant. Here, N is the number of electrons (or valence electrons) in the molecule. HyperChem uses this form of the wave function for most semi-empirical and ab initio calculations. Exceptions involve using the Configuration Interaction option (see page 119). HyperChem computes one-electron functions, termed molecular spin orbitals, by relatively simple integration and summation calculations. The many-electron wave function, which has N terms (the number of terms in the determinant), never needs to be evaluated. 

If a covalent bond is broken, as in the simple case of dissociation of the hydrogen molecule into atoms, then theRHFwave function without the Configuration Interaction option (see Extending the Wave Function Calculation on page 37) is inappropriate. This is because the doubly occupied RHFmolecular orbital includes spurious terms that place both electrons on the same hydrogen atom, even when they are separated by an infinite distance. 

Use Configuration Interaction to predict the electronic spectra of molecules. The Configuration Interaction wave function computes a ground state plus low lying excited states. You can obtain electronic absorption frequencies from the differences between the energies of the ground state and the excited states. 

Among the most widely used ab initio methods are those referred to as Gl" and 02." These methods incorporate large basis sets including d and / orbitals, called 6-311. The calculations also have extensive configuration interaction terms at the Moller-Plesset fourth order (MP4) and fiirther terms referred to as quadratic configuration interaction (QCISD). ° Finally, there are systematically applied correction terms calibrated by exact energies from small molecules. 

As computational facilities improve, electronic wavefunctions tend to become more and more complicated. A configuration interaction (Cl) calculation on a medium-sized molecule might be a linear combination of a million Slater determinants, and it is very easy to lose sight of the chemistry and the chemical intuition , to say nothing of the visualization of the results. Such wavefunctions seem to give no simple physical picture of the electron distribution, and so we must seek to find ways of extracting information that is chemically useful. 

Callen, E., J. Chem. Phys. 23, 360, Configuration interaction applied to the hydrogen molecule." A useful table A list of investigations of the wave functions and binding energies of the H2" is also contained. 

Funabashi, K., Magee, J. L., J. Chem. Phys. 26, 407, Central field approximation for the electronic wave functions of simple molecules/ Interaction of all electrons included, but no configurational interaction. 

---