Molecular solids, solution deposition

Sometimes camphor is used as the solvent (Rast method) because of its high constant ( 38). However, it is very prone to form solid solutions which vitiate this method of determining molecular weights, since it is based on the assumption that the first solid to be deposited will be the pure solvent. The use of camphor and related solvents is therefore not recommended. The possibility of obtaining solid solutions should be recognized in all cases, for this is one of the main limitations to the use of this method. 

One major drawback of GC-FTIR is that the spectra collected are either in the gas phase at high temperatures or trapped at cryogenic temperatures. Most reference spectra in the literature, particularly for older synthetic work, were collected at room temperature as liquid films or as solid solutions in KBr pellets. These reference spectra have much broader bands and so spectral matching is not possible for gas-phase collection. Matrix effects, particularly for the more polar compounds, can occur in vapor deposition samples. These samples are undiluted, so that inter-molecular interactions can occur. Hydrogen bonding or acid-base interactions are minimized in the reference spectra because of the diluting KBr matrix. In spite of these possible problems, in a recent review article Bruno [85] estimated that GC-FTIR spectral matching was accurate around 95 % of the time. This contrasts with his estimate of only 75 % for correct GC-MS spectral identification. He attributed the difference mainly to the similarities in the mass spectra of isomers, which FTIR can differentiate. 

The assumption of exclusive deposition on to the surface of the like metal applies, of course, only as a limiting case. In practice, some codeposition at the molecular level is expected. Indeed, in some systems which show immisci-bility in the solid phase under equilibrium conditions (e.g., Cu-Pb and Cu-Tl), there is evidence that, in an electrodeposited layer, each phase contains some concentration of the other component. Thus, reduction of the less noble component occurs at more positive potentials than those estimated on the basis of standard potentials of the pure metal. The potential shifts can be of the order of several tens of millivolts, and can be explained by the crystallites of the eutectic being supersaturated solid solutions of one component in the... 

Soiid Matrices. Most work on synthetic polymers use the solid matrices developed for the biopol5uner analysis. To use these matrices, solutions of polymer, matrix, and cationizing salt are mixed. The solvent is then allowed to evaporate from these solutions deposited onto a sample surface. The mass proportion ratios of the matrix pol5nner salt in the final solid mixture cover the range of 5 1 2 to 2000 1 1. These proportions are often dependent on molecular mass of the polymer (1). The choice of matrix compounds for synthetic polymers with respect to the polarity of the polymer have been discussed (34). As a general rule, matrix polarity should be matched with the polarity of the polymer so that both are soluble in a common solvent. Since the MALDI sample preparation requires intimate... 

An example of phase composition is shown in Figure 9.39. The deposits obtained in the PEG-free solution present a mixture of pure copper, a-CuSn phase (supersaturated solid solution of tin in copper) and hep phase. The content of pure Cu decreases with PEG molecular mass (except PEG-40000), but the a-CuSn phase prevails in all cases. The tendency was observed according to which the luster characteristics of coatings improve when the content of hep phase decreases. For... 

The substituted five-ring OPVs have been processed into poly crystal line thin films by vacuum deposition onto a substrate from the vapor phase. Optical absorption and photolumincscence of the films are significantly different from dilute solution spectra, which indicates that intermolecular interactions play an important role in the solid-state spectra. The molecular orientation and crystal domain size can be increased by thermal annealing of the films. This control of the microstruc-ture is essential for the use of such films in photonic devices. 

Field desorption (FD) is similar in principle to FI. It enables ions to be produced directly from solid samples which are deposited from solution onto an anode fitted to a probe that can be inserted into the instrument via a vacuum lock. It is even more gentle than Cl and FI, producing molecular ions and virtually no fragmentation. However, the ionization process decays very rapidly so spectra must be scanned quickly and cannot be re-recorded without introducing more sample. 

In view of the fundamental importance of the Gibbs-Thomson formula, and the magnitude of the discrepancies between the figures calculated from it and the experimental results, it is of obvious interest to inquire to What causes the deviations may be due. The first point to be noticed is that the complex substances which exhibit them most markedly form, at least at higher concentrations, colloidal and not true solutions. It is, therefore, very probable that they may form gelatinous or semi-solid skins on the adsorbent surface, in which the concentration may be very great. There is a considerable amount of evidence to support this view. Thus Lewis finds that, if the thickness of the surface layer be taken as equal to the radius of molecular attraction, say 2 X io 7 cms., and the concentration calculated from the observed adsorption, it is found, for instance, for methyl orange, to be about 39%, whereas the solubility of the substance is only about 078%. The surface layer, therefore, cannot possibly consist of a more concentrated solution of the dye, which is the only case that can be dealt with theoretically, but must be formed of a semi-solid deposit. 

The metal-solution interface as the locus of the deposition processes. This interface has two components a metal and an aqueous ionic solution. To understand this interface, it is necessary to have a basic knowledge of the structure and electronic properties of metals, the molecular structure of water, and the structure and properties of ionic solutions. The structure and electronic properties of metals are the subject matter of solid-state physics. The structure and properties of water and ionic solutions are (mainly) subjects related to chemical physics (and physical chemistry). Thus, to study and understand the structure of the metal-solution interface, it is necessary to have some knowledge of solid-state physics as well as of chemical physics. Relevant presentations of these subjects are given in Chapters 2 and 3. 

---