Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Molecular field interaction

Historically, ligand structure-based design has been the most widely used approach to the design of target-directed chemical libraries. Methods that start from hits or leads are among the most diverse, ranging from 2D substructure search and similarity-based techniques to analysis of 3D pharmacophores and molecular interaction fields (Fig. 15.2). [Pg.355]

Figure 15.2 Historical progress of ligand structure-based approaches from substructure search to analysis of 3-dimensional molecular interaction fields. Figure 15.2 Historical progress of ligand structure-based approaches from substructure search to analysis of 3-dimensional molecular interaction fields.
Cruciani G, editor. Molecular interaction fields (Vol. 27 of Mannhold R, Kubinyi... [Pg.423]

Clark RD et al. (2004) Modelling in vitro hepatotoxicity using molecular interaction fields and SIMCA. J Mol Graph Model 22(6) 487-497... [Pg.98]

Fig. 1.3 A survey of molecular properties molecular interaction fields MEPs, molecular based on their interdependence and the electrostatic potentials PK,... Fig. 1.3 A survey of molecular properties molecular interaction fields MEPs, molecular based on their interdependence and the electrostatic potentials PK,...
Recognition Forces and Molecular Interaction Fields (MIFs)... [Pg.9]

Goodford, P. J. The basic principles of GRID. In Molecular Interaction Fields Application in Drug Discovery and ADME Prediction (Methods and Principles in Medicinal Chemistry), Cruciani, G., Mannhold, R. Kubinyi, H., Folkers, G. [Pg.152]

A, B and V are constant for a given solute (Eig. 12.4 shows the value of A, 0.78, for atenolol). This means that the balance between intermolecular forces varies with the system investigated as would be expected from a careful reading of Section 12.1.1.3. This can also be demonstrated by using a completely different approach to factorize log P, i.e. a computational method based on molecular interaction fields [10]. Volsurf descriptors [11] have been used to calculate log P of neutral species both in n-octanol-water and in alkane-water [10]. [Pg.323]

Mannhold R, Berellini G, Carosati E, Benedetti P (2005) In Craciani G (ed) Molecular interaction fields in drag discovery (Methods and Principles in Medicinal Chemistry), vol 27. Wiley, Weinheim, Germany, p 173... [Pg.120]

Goodford P (2006) In Cruciani G, Mannhold R, Kubinyi H, Folkers G (eds) Molecular interaction fields applications in drug discovery and ADME prediction. Wiley, New York, p 3... [Pg.123]

The interaction of drug molecules with biological membranes is a three-dimensional (3D) recognition that is mediated by surface properties such as shape, Van der Waals forces, electrostatics, hydrogen bonding, and hydrophobicity. Therefore, the GRID force field [5-7], which is able to calculate energetically favorable interaction sites around a molecule, was selected to produce 3D molecular interaction fields. [Pg.408]

A molecular field involves mapping the chemical forces between an interacting partner and a target (macro)molecule. As the information contained in 3D molecular fields is related to the interacting molecular partners, the amount of information in molecular interaction fields (MIFs) is in general superior to other mono-dimensionally or bi-dimensionally computed molecular descriptors. [Pg.408]

Fig. 17.1. Multivariate characterization with VolSurf descriptors. Molecular Interaction Fields (MIF shaded areas) are computed from the 3D-molecular structure. MIFs are transformed in a table of descriptors, and statistical multivariate analysis is performed. Fig. 17.1. Multivariate characterization with VolSurf descriptors. Molecular Interaction Fields (MIF shaded areas) are computed from the 3D-molecular structure. MIFs are transformed in a table of descriptors, and statistical multivariate analysis is performed.
Cruciani et al. [92] have developed the program Metasite for the prediction of the site of oxidative metabolism by CYP450 enzymes. Metasite uses GRID molecular interaction fields to fingerprint both structures of CYP450s (from homology models or crystal structures) and test substrates and then matches the fields. Zhou et al. [93] showed that Metasite was able to correctly predict the site(s) of metabolism 78% of the time for 227 CYP3A4 substrates. Caron et al. [94] used Metasite to predict the oxidative metabolism of seven statins. [Pg.464]

Figure 12.2 The X-ray structure of human UGT2B7 (left) showing the UDPGA-binding site (left), and their molecular interaction fields (right) obtained using GRID force field [21], showing the large cavity and the hydrophilic regions (in blue). Figure 12.2 The X-ray structure of human UGT2B7 (left) showing the UDPGA-binding site (left), and their molecular interaction fields (right) obtained using GRID force field [21], showing the large cavity and the hydrophilic regions (in blue).
Figure 12.3 Rigid and flexible molecular interaction field maps with the hydrogen probe in the active-site cavity for CYP2C9 and UCT2B7 enzymes. It is worth noting that, with flexible side chains, the overall cavity volume changes considerably. This demonstrates the important role played by MIF-flexibility calculations in enzyme-substrate recognition. Figure 12.3 Rigid and flexible molecular interaction field maps with the hydrogen probe in the active-site cavity for CYP2C9 and UCT2B7 enzymes. It is worth noting that, with flexible side chains, the overall cavity volume changes considerably. This demonstrates the important role played by MIF-flexibility calculations in enzyme-substrate recognition.
Cruciani, G., Aristei, Y., Vianello, R. and Baroni, M. (2005) GRID-derived molecular interaction fields for predicting the site of metabolism in human cytochromes, in Molecular Interaction Fields (ed. G. Cruciani) Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH, Weinheim, pp. 273-290. [Pg.291]

Wolohan P.R.N. Clark R.D. Predicting drug pharmacokinetic properties using molecular interaction fields and SIMCA. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 2003, 17 (1), 65-76. [Pg.72]

Fig. 14.5 Computation of VolSurf descriptors [155, 156] derived from GRID molecular interaction fields. Interactions of the example molecule with a water and dry probe at different contour levels are used to compute a vector of 72 volume-, size- and surface-based descriptors. Fig. 14.5 Computation of VolSurf descriptors [155, 156] derived from GRID molecular interaction fields. Interactions of the example molecule with a water and dry probe at different contour levels are used to compute a vector of 72 volume-, size- and surface-based descriptors.
D molecular interaction field analysis of their ligand binding sites target family landscapes. /. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 2366-2378. [Pg.372]

Ahlstrom, M.M., Ridderstrom, M., Luthman, K. and Zamora, I. (2005) Virtual screening and scaffold hopping based on GRID molecular interaction fields. fournal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 45, 1313-1323. [Pg.80]

Cruciani, G. (ed.) (2006) Methods and Principles in Medicinal Chemistry -Molecular Interaction Fields (series eds H. Kubinyi, G. Folkers and R. Mannhold), VCH Publisher, New York. [Pg.80]

Another class of 3D descriptors is molecular interaction field (MIF) descriptors, with its well-known example of Comparative Molecular Field Analysis (204,205) (CoMFA). In CoMFA, the steric and electrostatic fields are calculated for each molecule by interaction with a probe atom at a series of grid points surrounding the aligned molecules in 3D space. These interaction energy fields are correlated with the property of interest. The 3D nature of the CoMFA technique provides a convenient tool for visualization of the significant features of the resulting models. [Pg.474]

Milletti, E., Storchi, L., Sforna, G. and Cruciani, G. (2007) New and original pKa prediction method using grid molecular interaction fields. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 47,... [Pg.42]

Crudani, G. (2006) Molecular Interaction Fields, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, pp. 1-307. [Pg.116]


See other pages where Molecular field interaction is mentioned: [Pg.3]    [Pg.476]    [Pg.406]    [Pg.252]    [Pg.262]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.290]    [Pg.383]    [Pg.391]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.344]    [Pg.350]    [Pg.439]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.477]    [Pg.97]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.355 , Pg.357 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.39 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.409 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.383 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.415 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.117 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.590 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.397 , Pg.407 , Pg.413 , Pg.415 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.590 ]




SEARCH



Alignment-independent Descriptors from Molecular Interaction Fields

CYPs Characterization using GRID Molecular Interaction Fields

Calculation and Application of Molecular Interaction Fields

Calculation of the Molecular Interaction Field

Descriptor GRID molecular interaction fields

Drug molecular interaction field

GRID flexible molecular interaction fields

GRID molecular interaction fields

Interacting field

Interaction field

Molecular Interaction Fields (MIFs) VolSurf

Molecular Interaction Fields Transformation

Molecular interaction field -based

Molecular interaction field -based method

Molecular interactions

Molecular interactive

Pharmacophores molecular interaction fields

Progress in ADME Prediction Using GRID-Molecular Interaction Fields

Recognition Forces and Molecular Interaction Fields (MIFs)

Selectivity GRID molecular interaction fields

Self-consistent field for molecular interactions

© 2024 chempedia.info