Molar-average boiling point

The Kellogg and DePriester charts and their subsequent extensions and generahzations use the molar average boiling points of the liquid and vapor phases to represent the composition effect. An alternative measure of composition is the convergence pressure of the system, which is defined as that pressure at which the Kvalues for aU the components in an isothermal mixture converge to unity. It is analogous to the critical point for a pure component in the sense that the two... 

Characterization factor the UOP characterization factor K, defined as the ratio of the cube root of the molar average boiling point, TB, in degrees Rankine (°r = °F + 460), to the specific gravity at 60°F/60°F ... 

While not of importance here, for background information, the Watson K factor is used in the oil industry as means of characterising the paraffinicity of a mixture of hydrocarbons and is derived from the molar average boiling point (MABP) (in °R) and the specific gravity at 60 °F (5G). 

Figure 6. Asymptotic behavior correlations (ABC) for average boiling point and liquid molar volume of crude oil fractions...

Use densities and mole weights to calculate volume-, cubic-, molar- and mean-average boiling point of the total fraction [55]. 

Component 1 is the solute, while component 2 is water. The molar volume of the solute in mVkmole is at the solute normal boiling point, while the viscosity of water in Pa sec is at the temperature of the system resulting in a diffusivity in mVsec. The average error is about 9 percent when tested on 36 experimental systems. 

Using these data for water, the molar heat capacity is 18.02 cal/mol K (approximately 75.40 J/mol K). Note that the deviations from this average are all less than 1 percent between the freezing and boiling points. The point being made is that the heat capacity may depend (slightly) on temperature, but is a reasonably stable value making it possible to consider heat capacity as a constant, as it is in this book. 

The results for molar volumes at 20° C. (and also at 0°C.) are quite different from those at the boiling-point. At 20° C., an addition of CH2 increases Vm by 16 27 (instead of 22 at the b.p.) for paraffins Fm=32 05+16 72 , and for esters C H2w02, Fm=37 55+16 27/1 a double bond between carbon atoms causes an increase of 24 6-27 1 (average 26), olefins with terminal double bonds having... 

The transpiration method is a simple and versatile method for vapor pressure measurement at high temperatures. An inert carrier gas is passed over the condensed substance in a constant temperature furnace zone. The flow rate of the carrier gas is constant and sufficiently small so that the carrier gas is saturated with vapor, which condenses at some point downstream. The mass of vapor transported by a known volume of carrier gas is determined. If the total vapor pressure is known, from the boiling point method, the results from the transpiration method may be used to calculate the average molar mass of the vapor. 

Total condenser, P = 1 atm, boiling-point liquid feed, N = 13, /= 6, F = 0.1078 g mol/min, D = 0.0208 g mol min. Use a reflux ratio of 10. The holdup is taken as 1.0 liters for the reboiler and 0.3 liter for each plate md the condenser. The molar densities of the liquids acetic acid, ethyl alcohol, water, and CThyl acetate were 17.470, 17.129, 55.49, and 10.22 moles per liter respectively. The mole frac S>n average of these was used as the molar density of the mixture. Use the vapor-liquid equilibrium, enthalpy, and reaction rate data given in Tables B-19 through B-21. 

For predicting diffusivities in binaiy polar or associating liquid systems at high solute dilution, the method of Wilke and Chang defined in Eq. (2-156) can be utilized. The Tyn and Calus equation (2-152) can be used to determine the molar volume of the solute at the normal boiling point. Errors average 20 percent, with occasional errors of 35 percent. The method is not considered to be accurate above a solute concentration of 5 mole percent. 

Component 1 is the solute, while component 2 is the solvent. The latent heats, X, are at the normal boiling point, as are the molar volumes. Using T in K and p in Pa sec yields a diffusivity in m /sec. The average error is 21 percent when tested on 237 experimental systems. 

Hence, any colligative method should yield the number average molar mass M of a polydisperse polymer. Polymer solutions do not behave in an ideal manner, and nonideal behavior can be eliminated by extrapolating the experimental (F/c) data to c = 0. For example, in the case of boiling point elevation measurements (ebullio-scopy) Equation 9.2 takes the form... 

Comment This estimate of the molar heat of vaporization of water is somewhat lower than the value measured at the normal boiling point (100°C) listed in Table 7.7 (40.79 kJ moU ). This apparent discrepancy arises because AH, p is temperature dependent, so the value determined graphically in this exercise actually represents an average over the temperature interval 15°C to 80°C. 

In many cases distribution functions are determined experimentally the characterization of petroleum fractions by true-boiling-point distillation or gas-chromatographically simulated distillation, and the characterization of polymers by gel-permeation chromatography. In principle, the integrals of continuous thermodynamics may be directly solved based on these experimentally determined distribution functions. However, this approach delicate numerical analyses and the assumption the complete distribution function has been obtained by experiment clearly this is no the case, for example, for some polymers only molar-mass averages are determined. Thus, there are numerous cases where smoothed or analytical distribution function provides more reliable phase equilibrium calculation than those obtained by use of the experimentally determined distribution function. When the integrals of continuous thermodynamics possess analytical solutions considerably numerical simplification is afforded and this is one motive for the desire to have analytical expressions for the distribution function. 

---