Modified convergence problems

Computational procedures such as those illustrated in Table 2 are easy to apply to simple atomic systems but need to be modified for complex calculations when expansions explode as the orbital set increases. The current grasp2K code encounters convergence problems when two correlation orbitals of the same symmetry are varied simultaneously. A practical and stable procedure in this case is to introduce only one new orbital of each symmetry and optimize only the new orbitals. These orbitals are sometimes referred to as a layer [2]. In this way, a basis of relativistic orbitals is built for a final calculation that includes other effects such as Breit and QED corrections. Such a procedure was used in the determination of transitions probabilities for Fe + [19]. 

Usually it is not opportune to calculate the Jacobian J at each iteration (particularly for large-dimension problems). Rather it should be done only when there are convergence problems in the system solution. When J is modified, the matrix G must also be updated and refactorized. 

Another kind of convergence problems is related to a too late operation of the Pauli exclusion principle. This pertains also to SAPT. Why Look at Table 13.2. One of the perturbational schemes given there (namely, the symmetrized polarization approximation) is based on calculation of the wave function, exactly as in the polarization approximation scheme, but just before calculation of the corrections to the energy, the polarization wave function is projected on the antisymmetrized space. This procedure is bound to have trouble. The system excessively changes its charge distribution without paying any attention to the PauU exclusion principle (thus allowing it to polarize itself in a non-physical way-this may be described as overpolarization), and then the result has to be modified in order to fulfill a principle (the PauU principle). 

This equation does not have to be evaluated for all possible e,j. The condition ij = ji proved by Hinze [292] allows one to control the numerical solution of the SCF equations and is actually an identical solution condition to obtain the MCSCF spinors. It can be fulfilled (in terms of machine precision and numerical accuracy) only if the SCF iteration is converged. On the other hand, a large discrepancy could result in convergence problems. Of course, Eq. (9.111) has to be adjusted if the Breit interaction enters the two-electron interaction terms and hence modifies the potential functions. These changes, however, are straightforward [201]. 

Convergence of PSLP on the modified Griffith-Stewart problem... 

There are two possible solutions to this problem. We may either modify our ansatz for the wavefunction, including terms that depend explicitly on the interelectronic coordinates [26-30], or we may take advantage of the smooth convergence of the correlation-consistent basis sets to extrapolate to the basis-set limit [6, 31-39], In our work, we have considered both approaches as we shall see, they are fully consistent with each other and with the available experimental data. With these techniques, the accurate calculation of AEs is achieved at a much lower cost than with the brute-force approach described in the present section. 

Boosting is crucial for the successful operation of the pattern-recognition GA because it modifies the fitness landscape by adjusting the values of the class and sample weights. This helps to minimize the problem of convergence... 

Program a modified Newton method to solve the problem, seeking the solution near x 0.5. Explore the performance of the algorithm (including failure to converge) beginning with initial iterates of xo = 1 and xo = 3. 

The application of constraints should always be prudent and soundly grounded, and constraints should only be set when there is an absolute certainty about the validity of the constraint. Even a potentially useful constraint can play a negative role in the resolution process when factors like experimental noise or instrumental problems distort the related profile or when the profile is modified so roughly that the convergence of the optimization process is seriously damaged. When well implemented and fulfilled by the data set, constraints can be seen as the driving forces of the iterative process to the right solution and, often, they are found not to be active in the last part of the optimization process. 

---