Models valence bond-polarized

VBPCM Valence bond polarized continuum model. A VB computational method that incorporates solvent effect by using the PCM solvation model. The method can be coupled with VBSCF, BOVB, and VBCI. 

In the previous chapters, we discussed various models of bonding for covalent and polar covalent molecules (the VSEPR and LCP models, valence bond theory, and molecular orbital theory). We shall now turn our focus to a discussion of models describing metallic bonding. We begin with the free electron model, which assumes that the ionized electrons in a metallic solid have been completely removed from the influence of the atoms in the crystal and exist essentially as an electron gas. Freshman chemistry books typically describe this simplified version of metallic bonding as a sea of electrons that is delocalized over all the metal atoms in the crystalline solid. We shall then progress to the band theory of solids, which results from introducing the periodic potential of the crystalline lattice. 

We often refer to Heitler and London s method as the valence bond (VB) model. A comparison between the experimental and the valence bond potential energy curves shows excellent agreement at large 7 ab but poor quantitative agreement in the valence region (Table 4.3). The cause of this lies in the method itself the VB model starts from atomic wavefunctions and adds as a perturbation the fact that the electron clouds of the atoms are polarized when the molecule is formed. 

The aptness of the idealized sd/J Lewis-like model is also confirmed by the quantitative NBO descriptors, as summarized inTable4.5. This table displays the overall accuracy of the Lewis-like description (in terms of %pl, the percentage accuracy of the natural Lewis-like wavefunction for both valence-shell and total electron density) as well as the metal hybridization (hM), bond polarity toward M (100cm2), and... 

The weak and highly polar Cl—F bond in FCIO can be rationalized in terms of either a (p—7T )a bond (see Section II, C) or a simple valence bond model (66) resulting in a resonance hybrid of the following canonical forms FCIO2 F + C102. It has been discussed in detail by Parent and Gerry (220), by Carter et al. (43), and in Section II, C of this review. 

Figure 2.21. The composition of the adsorbate orbitals of symmetry in a perturbational treatment for N2 adsorbed on Ni. Polarization is achieved through intergroup and intragroup mixing. In terms of a valence bonding model, this can be seen as the partial breaking of the N2tt bond, forming nitrogen radicals. From Ref. [3].

Valence bond (VB) theories or empirical valence bond (EVB) methods have been developed in order to solve this problem with bond potential functions that (i) allow the change of the valence bond network over time and (ii) are simple enough to be used efficiently in an otherwise classical MD simulation code. In an EVB scheme, the chemical bond in a dissociating molecule is described as the superposition of two states a less-polar bonded state and an ionic dissociated state. One of the descriptions is given by Walbran and Kornyshev in modeling of the water dissociation process.4,5 As... 

The valence bond method with polarizable continuum model (VBPCM) method (55) includes solute—solvent interactions in the VB calculations. It uses the same continuum solvation model as the standard PCM model implemented in current ab initio quantum chemistry packages, where the solvent is represented as a homogeneous medium, characterized by a dielectric constant, and is polarizable by the charge distribution of the solute. The interaction between the solute charges and the polarized electric field of the solvent is taken into account through an interaction potential that is embedded in the... 

Two models have been used to predict dissociation energies for heteronuclear diatomic transition metal molecules, the valence bond model (9), which proposes a polar single bond, and the atomic cell model (7). Their success when compared with experiment is indicated by the following examples ... 

The Knudsen effusion method In conjunction with mass spectrometrlc analysis has been used to determine the bond energies and appearance potentials of diatomic metals and small metallic clusters. The experimental bond energies are reported and Interpreted In terms of various empirical models of bonding, such as the Pauling model of a polar single bond, the empirical valence bond model for certain multiply-bonded dlatomlcs, the atomic cell model, and bond additivity concepts. The stability of positive Ions of metal molecules Is also discussed. 

The use of empirical models of bonding has been Invaluable for the interpretation of the experimental dissociation energies of diatomrLc Intermetallic molecules as well as for the prediction of the bond energies of new molecules. In the course of our work, conducted for over a decade, we have extended the applicability of the Pauling model of a polar single bond (31) and have developed new models such as the empirical valence bond model for certain multiple bonded transition metal molecules (32,33) and the atomic cell model (34). 

Bonding. —In the valence-bond description of XeF2, Coulson has emphasized the dominance of the canonical forms (F-Xe)+F and F (Xe-F) in the resonance hybrid. This representation accounts well for the polarity FXe F , indicated by nmr, Moss-bauer, ESCA, and thermodynamic data. It is particularly impressive that the enthalpy of sublimina-tion derived for the XeFy case, by Rice and his co-workers in 1963, on the basis of the charge distribution "FXe+F , is 13.3 kcal mol , whereas the experimental value reported in 1968 is 13.2 kcal mol . It should be recognized that the Coulson valence-bond model is not, in the final analysis, significantly different from the Rundle and Pimentel three-center molecular orbital description or the Bilham and Linnett one-electron-bond description, but it does provide for a more straightforward estimation of thermodynamic stabilities of compounds than the other approaches do. 

Soon after the development of the quantum mechanical model of the atom, physicists such as John H. van Vleck (1928) began to investigate a wave-mechanical concept of the chemical bond. The electronic theories of valency, polarity, quantum numbers, and electron distributions in atoms were described, and the valence bond approximation, which depicts covalent bonding in molecules, was built upon these principles. In 1939, Linus Pauling s Nature of the Chemical Bond offered valence bond theory (VBT) as a plausible explanation for bonding in transition metal complexes. His application of VBT to transition metal complexes was supported by Bjerrum s work on stability that suggested electrostatics alone could not account for all bonding characteristics. 

Chen, G., Lu. I).. Goddard, III. W.A. Valence-bond charge-transfer solvation model for nonlinear optical properties of organic molecules in polar solvents. J. Chem. Phys. 101, 5860-5864 (1994)... 

Empirical models have been developed to predict the bond energies of metallic and intermetallic molecules, such as the following the Pauling model of a polar single bond [174], the valence bond model for certain multiply bonded metallic molecules by Brewer [175] and Gingerich [176], and the macroscopic atom or atomic cell model by Miedema and Gingerich [177]. 

Shaik and coworkers found that a more significant influence of the protein in the calculations was the polarization of orbitals involved in Fe-02 bonding. The group melded the three aforementioned bonding models in a valence bond framework in with the terms of a bonding wavefunction given by (2) ... 

---