Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Model reduction residualization

The modeling of residual stress development during cure can be used to optimize the processing conditions to reduce or control residual stresses. The current process model is used next to assess the effects of several processing conditions on residual stresses. Reduced cure temperature, longer dwell times, slower cool down rate, and the use of novel cure cycles are all feasible for the reduction of residual stresses. [Pg.263]

In other words, the KLE provides an optimal set of orthogonal basis vectors that minimizes the error residual, i.e., for a given r there is no better choice of an orthogonal set of vectors than the first r vectors given by KLE. Traditionally, model reduction using KLE involves projecting the equations on the subspace spanned by these basis vectors. However, to avoid a change in realization, no projection will be performed at this point. [Pg.60]

For dynamic simulation, pure OC is unsuitable. OCFE is found to give realistic representation of column s behaviour, together with a small-size model. This presents a good option to FD scheme. Linear model reduction techniques are further applied to reduce the model for control design purpose. Balanced residualization with 15 states approximates satisfactorily the column dynamics. [Pg.934]

Figure 5. Residual monomer reduction before and after model application. Figure 5. Residual monomer reduction before and after model application.
In contrast to the Tucker3 model, described above, the number of factors in each mode is identical. It is chosen to be much smaller than the original dimensions of the data table in order to achieve a considerable reduction of the data. The elements of the loading matrices A, B, C are computed such as to minimize the sum of squared residuals. [Pg.156]

The cumulative curve obtained from the transit time distribution in Figure 9 was fitted by Eq. (48) to determine the number of compartments. An additional compartment was added until the reduction in residual (error) sum of squares (SSE) with an additional compartment becomes small. An F test was not used, because the compartmental model with a fixed number of compartments contains no parameters. SSE then became the only criterion to select the best compartmental model. The number of compartments generating the smallest SSE was seven. The seven-compartment model was thereafter referred to as the compartmental transit model. [Pg.411]

In fact thermomigration readily takes place in the absence of surfactant, albeit usually to a lesser extent. In this case only the second of the above processes takes place. The term surfactant in this model can be interpreted broadly to include any residual surfactant, reduction clearing assistant or applied finish, such as an antistat, lubricant or softener. [Pg.390]

Figure 3. The general nitrogen model for illustrating the bio geochemical cycling in Forest ecosystems. Explanations for the fluxes 1, ammonia volatilization 2, forest fertilization 3, N2-fixation 4, denitrification 5, nitrate respiration 6, nitrification 7, immobilization 8, mineralization 9, assimilatory and dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium 10, leaching 11, plant uptake 12, deposition N input 13, residue composition, exudation 14, soil erosion 15, ammonium fixation and release by clay minerals 16, biomass combustion 17, forest harvesting 18, litterfall (Bashkin, 2002). Figure 3. The general nitrogen model for illustrating the bio geochemical cycling in Forest ecosystems. Explanations for the fluxes 1, ammonia volatilization 2, forest fertilization 3, N2-fixation 4, denitrification 5, nitrate respiration 6, nitrification 7, immobilization 8, mineralization 9, assimilatory and dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium 10, leaching 11, plant uptake 12, deposition N input 13, residue composition, exudation 14, soil erosion 15, ammonium fixation and release by clay minerals 16, biomass combustion 17, forest harvesting 18, litterfall (Bashkin, 2002).
Use of all variables will produce a better fit of the model for the training data because the residuals become smaller and thus the R2 measure increases (see Section 4.2). However, we are usually not interested in maximizing the fit for the training data but in maximizing the prediction performance for the test data. Thus a reduction of the regressor variables can avoid the effects of overfitting and lead to an improved prediction performance. [Pg.151]

Tyrosine fluorescence emission in proteins and polypeptides usually has a maximum between 303 and 305 nm, the same as that for tyrosine in solution. Compared to the Stokes shift for tryptophan fluorescence, that for tyrosine appears to be relatively insensitive to the local environment, although neighboring residues do have a strong effect on the emission intensity. While it is possible for a tyrosine residue in a protein to have a higher quantum yield than that of model compounds in water, for example, if the phenol side chain is shielded from solvent and the local environment contains no proton acceptors, many intra- and intermolecular interactions result in a reduction of the quantum yield. As discussed below, this is evident from metal- and ionbinding data, from pH titration data, and from comparisons of the spectral characteristics of tyrosine in native and denatured proteins. [Pg.22]

A comparison has been made of the efficiencies of conventional and ultrasonically assisted pollutant extraction procedures using model soil samples (granular pieces of brick) which had been deliberately contaminated with copper oxide at 51 ppm [50]. Analysis of the brick particles after 30 min sonication on a Vibrating Tray [51] revealed an average reduction in copper content to 31 ppm, a reduction of about 40%. Using a conventional mechanically shaken tray for the same time period the residual contamination was 48 ppm representing a reduction of only 6% (Tab. 4.6). [Pg.146]

These observations form the basis for the working hypothesis for the mechanism of cluster assembly on the IscU scaffold (Fig. 5.6). The proposal that the reductive coupling of two [Fc282] " clusters to yield a 6484] " cluster involves disulfide formation between two of the released cysteine residues is based on model chemistry. Flohn and co-workers showed that... [Pg.59]


See other pages where Model reduction residualization is mentioned: [Pg.47]    [Pg.346]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.723]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.318]    [Pg.318]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.358]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.1256]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.190]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.426]    [Pg.432]    [Pg.433]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.192]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.391]    [Pg.170]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.355 ]




SEARCH



Model reduction

Residual reduction

© 2024 chempedia.info