Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Model chemistry Lewis

The approximation (1.32) of a single Lewis ( resonance ) structure is often inadequate, and the associated model chemistry of Eq. (1.33) cannot accurately describe the system of interest. Because density matrix D(L) (cf. Eqs. (1.25) and (1.27)), we can also say that the localized density matrix D(L) does not sufficiently approximate the true delocalized density matrix D(trae) associated with [Pg.32]

Brown, I. D. (1980). A structural model for Lewis acids and bases. An analysis of the structural chemistry of acetate and trifluoroacetate ions. /. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. pp. 1118-1123. [Pg.67]

A nucleophilic hydroxide coordinated to one metal ion (terminal coordination) or bridged to both metals (, -hydroxo coordination) is possible both types are present in the X-ray structures. We first consider the possibility that the nucleophile in the reaction is a water molecule coordinated to the Fe + ion of the binuclear metal center. A terminal metal-hydroxo species serving as a nucleophile in an hydrolysis reaction has precedence in model chemistry [62]. The Lewis acidity of the metal, which plays a role by decreasing the pXa of the coordinated water molecule, is more favorable for Fe + than Fe +. The pAaS of water coordinated to aqueous Fe " " and Fe + ate 2.13 and 8.44, respectively, a > 10 -fold difference in acidity [74]. A lower pAa makes it easier to deprotonate to form the hydroxide, the putative nucleophile in the reaction. The loss of activity of Fe -Fe calcineurin upon reduction to the Fe " -Fe + state may therefore reflect the poorer Lewis acidity of Fe + and the requirement for an hydroxide coordinated to the Fe " " ion in the Ml site [35]. [Pg.290]

It would be wrong to interpret this work as an effort to refute the importance of quantum theory for chemistry. It does the opposite, but questions the methodology that developed from a naive interpretation of three-dimensional wave mechanics to confirm the electron-pair model of Lewis and the molecular structure theory of van t Hoff. Even in terms of the probabilistic interpretation of wave mechanics, a rigid three-dimensionally structured molecule, with its real molecular orbitals, is undefined. A strategy, based on these concepts and which became known as Quantum Chemistry, amounts to a disastrous misreading of quantum theory and has no predictive power beyond its classical basis. [Pg.133]

The problems associated with predicting regioselectivity in quinone Diels-Alder chemistry have been studied, and a mechanistic model based on frontier molecular orbital theory proposed (85). In certain cases of poor regioselectivity, eg, 2-methoxy-5-methyl-l,4-ben2oquinone with alkyl-substituted dienes, the use of Lewis acid catalysts is effective (86). [Pg.414]

Sloane, C. S., and Tesche, T. W., "Atmospheric Chemistry Models and Predictions for Climate and Air Quality." Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, Ml, 1991. [Pg.177]

Why do we want to model molecules and chemical reactions Chemists are interested in the distribution of electrons around the nuclei, and how these electrons rearrange in a chemical reaction this is what chemistry is all about. Thomson tried to develop an electronic theory of valence in 1897. He was quickly followed by Lewis, Langmuir and Kossel, but their models all suffered from the same defect in that they tried to treat the electrons as classical point electric charges at rest. [Pg.1]

Many of the Lewis structures in Chapter 9 and elsewhere in this book represent molecules that contain double bonds and triple bonds. From simple molecules such as ethylene and acetylene to complex biochemical compounds such as chlorophyll and plastoquinone, multiple bonds are abundant in chemistry. Double bonds and triple bonds can be described by extending the orbital overlap model of bonding. We begin with ethylene, a simple hydrocarbon with the formula C2 H4. [Pg.678]

In summary, the Lewis-like model seems to predict the composition, qualitative molecular shape, and general forms of hybrids and bond functions accurately for a wide variety of main-group derivatives of transition metals. The sd-hybridization and duodectet-rule concepts for d-block elements therefore appear to offer an extended zeroth-order Lewis-like model of covalent bonding that spans main-group and transition-metal chemistry in a satisfactorily unified manner. [Pg.433]

Dixon-Lewis, G., "Computer modeling of combustion reactions in flowing systems with transport, in "Combustion Chemistry" (W. C. Gardiner, Jr., ed.). Springer-Verlag, New York, 1984. [Pg.192]

Hales, J. M., A Modelling Investigation of Nonlinearities in the Wet Removal of S02 Emitted by Urban Sources, in Atmospheric Chemistry Models and Predictions for Climate and Air Quality (C. S. Sloane and T. W. Tesche, Eds.), Chap. 8, pp. 117-130, Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, MI, 1991. [Pg.936]

Of all the concepts used in chemistry, that of the chemical bond is one of the most useful and, at the same time, one of the most difficult. It is useful because it helps us to understand the structures of compounds and their properties, and it is difficult because it is not easy to relate it to the physical theories, such as quantum mechanics, that underlie chemistry. This is not to say that people have not attempted to find a connection between the chemical bond and quantum mechanics. The Lewis (1923) electron pair model and the orbital overlap model (Coulson 1961) are, perhaps, among the better known attempts, but all are a posteriori rationalizations, trying to explain the properties of the empirical nineteenth-century chemical bond in terms of twentieth-century physical concepts. It is unlikely that, left to themselves, theoretical chemists in the twentieth century would have ever created the idea of a chemical bond had not the concept already been central to the language of structural chemistry. To this day the chemical bond remains largely an empirical concept. [Pg.3]

Other simplified quantum treatments, such as the Lewis electron pair and orbital overlap models, have proved useful in teaching and they give qualitative predictions of the structures of molecular compounds, but they become unwieldy when applied to solids. They have not proved to be particularly helpful in the description of the complex structures found in inorganic chemistry and have therefore not been widely used in this field. [Pg.6]


See other pages where Model chemistry Lewis is mentioned: [Pg.29]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.515]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.461]    [Pg.230]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.1149]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.364]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.281]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.399]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.417]    [Pg.281]    [Pg.395]    [Pg.517]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.268]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.29 ]




SEARCH



Lewis model

Model chemistry

Modelling chemistry

© 2024 chempedia.info